Cargando…

Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications

Denser ionisation clustering and complex DNA damage in proton Bragg peaks far exceeds that seen with conventional X-rays. This results in more efficient cell sterilisation, quantified by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Currently, a 1.1 RBE is used to determine the clinical proton doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jones, Bleddyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104614
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.777
_version_ 1783274213550850048
author Jones, Bleddyn
author_facet Jones, Bleddyn
author_sort Jones, Bleddyn
collection PubMed
description Denser ionisation clustering and complex DNA damage in proton Bragg peaks far exceeds that seen with conventional X-rays. This results in more efficient cell sterilisation, quantified by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Currently, a 1.1 RBE is used to determine the clinical proton doses by dividing the usual X-rays dose by this amount. This number, derived from short-term experiments, has been criticised as being irrelevant to late normal tissue (NT) effects following radiotherapy and included many control irradiations using lower voltage X-rays (with elevated RBE values) than those used in the clinic. In principle, an increased RBE could be used for each organ at risk, by using extensions of the clinically successful linear quadratic model. Protons undoubtedly reduce or eliminate NT radiation dose in tissues distantly located from a tumour, but the necessity to include NT margins around a tumour can result in a higher volume of NT than tumour being irradiated. Deleterious side-effects can follow if the NT RBE exceeds 1.1, including in tissue very close to these margins and which are only partially spared. Use of a constant 1.1 RBE can ‘overdose’ NT, which may require a greater dose reduction such as 1.2 in the brain; some tumours may be ‘under-dosed’ (since they might require a lesser or no reduction in dose). More sophisticated proton experiments show that RBE values of 1.1–1.5 and higher occur in some situations. There are now mathematical models of varying degrees of complexity that can estimate the RBE from the dose, LET and the low-LET radiosensitivities. True multidisciplinary cooperation is required to implement such new ideas in proton therapy in order to improve safety and effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5659823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56598232017-11-03 Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications Jones, Bleddyn Ecancermedicalscience Review Denser ionisation clustering and complex DNA damage in proton Bragg peaks far exceeds that seen with conventional X-rays. This results in more efficient cell sterilisation, quantified by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Currently, a 1.1 RBE is used to determine the clinical proton doses by dividing the usual X-rays dose by this amount. This number, derived from short-term experiments, has been criticised as being irrelevant to late normal tissue (NT) effects following radiotherapy and included many control irradiations using lower voltage X-rays (with elevated RBE values) than those used in the clinic. In principle, an increased RBE could be used for each organ at risk, by using extensions of the clinically successful linear quadratic model. Protons undoubtedly reduce or eliminate NT radiation dose in tissues distantly located from a tumour, but the necessity to include NT margins around a tumour can result in a higher volume of NT than tumour being irradiated. Deleterious side-effects can follow if the NT RBE exceeds 1.1, including in tissue very close to these margins and which are only partially spared. Use of a constant 1.1 RBE can ‘overdose’ NT, which may require a greater dose reduction such as 1.2 in the brain; some tumours may be ‘under-dosed’ (since they might require a lesser or no reduction in dose). More sophisticated proton experiments show that RBE values of 1.1–1.5 and higher occur in some situations. There are now mathematical models of varying degrees of complexity that can estimate the RBE from the dose, LET and the low-LET radiosensitivities. True multidisciplinary cooperation is required to implement such new ideas in proton therapy in order to improve safety and effectiveness. Cancer Intelligence 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5659823/ /pubmed/29104614 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.777 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jones, Bleddyn
Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title_full Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title_fullStr Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title_short Proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
title_sort proton radiobiology and its clinical implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104614
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.777
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesbleddyn protonradiobiologyanditsclinicalimplications