Cargando…
Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cancer Intelligence
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776 |
_version_ | 1783274214285901824 |
---|---|
author | Noronha, Vanita Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv More, Sucheta Goud, Supriya Karpe, Ashay Ramaswamy, Anant Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar |
author_facet | Noronha, Vanita Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv More, Sucheta Goud, Supriya Karpe, Ashay Ramaswamy, Anant Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar |
author_sort | Noronha, Vanita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a study comparing pemetrexed–platinum combination versus oral TKI in EGFR mutation-positive patients in lung cancer. We analysed the impact of EGFR mutation subtype, specifically, exon 19 and 21 on the PFS and OS of patients treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) as first-line therapy. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126 and subsequently every two months till progression. Patients post-progression were treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (36%) had exon 21 mutation, while 92 patients (64%) had exon 19 mutation. Response rates in evaluable patients was 47.7% in exon 19 patients (41 patients, n = 86) and 42.9 % in exon 21 patients (18 patients, n = 42). There was a significant increase in median overall survival for patients with exon 19 mutations (24.5 months, 95% CI: 21.3–27.7 months ) over the exon 21-mutated patients (18.1 months, 95% Cl: 13.5–22.6 months, p = 0.002). This differential impact was due to second-line gefitinib having a differential outcome on these mutations. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have a differential impact on exon 19- or exon 21-mutated patients. However, second-line treatment with gefitinib has a favourable response and outcome in exon 19-mutated patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5659826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cancer Intelligence |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56598262017-11-03 Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy Noronha, Vanita Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv More, Sucheta Goud, Supriya Karpe, Ashay Ramaswamy, Anant Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Ecancermedicalscience Clinical Study BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a study comparing pemetrexed–platinum combination versus oral TKI in EGFR mutation-positive patients in lung cancer. We analysed the impact of EGFR mutation subtype, specifically, exon 19 and 21 on the PFS and OS of patients treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) as first-line therapy. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126 and subsequently every two months till progression. Patients post-progression were treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (36%) had exon 21 mutation, while 92 patients (64%) had exon 19 mutation. Response rates in evaluable patients was 47.7% in exon 19 patients (41 patients, n = 86) and 42.9 % in exon 21 patients (18 patients, n = 42). There was a significant increase in median overall survival for patients with exon 19 mutations (24.5 months, 95% CI: 21.3–27.7 months ) over the exon 21-mutated patients (18.1 months, 95% Cl: 13.5–22.6 months, p = 0.002). This differential impact was due to second-line gefitinib having a differential outcome on these mutations. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have a differential impact on exon 19- or exon 21-mutated patients. However, second-line treatment with gefitinib has a favourable response and outcome in exon 19-mutated patients. Cancer Intelligence 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5659826/ /pubmed/29104613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Noronha, Vanita Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv More, Sucheta Goud, Supriya Karpe, Ashay Ramaswamy, Anant Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title | Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title_full | Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title_short | Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
title_sort | impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 egfr-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noronhavanita impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT patilvijay impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT joshiamit impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT chouguleanuradha impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT bhattacharjeeatanu impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT kumarrajiv impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT moresucheta impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT goudsupriya impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT karpeashay impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT ramaswamyanant impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT pandenikhil impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT chandrasekharanarun impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT goelalok impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT talrejavikas impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT mahajanabhishek impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT januamit impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT purandarenilendu impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy AT prabhashkumar impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy |