Cargando…

Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noronha, Vanita, Patil, Vijay, Joshi, Amit, Chougule, Anuradha, Bhattacharjee, Atanu, Kumar, Rajiv, More, Sucheta, Goud, Supriya, Karpe, Ashay, Ramaswamy, Anant, Pande, Nikhil, Chandrasekharan, Arun, Goel, Alok, Talreja, Vikas, Mahajan, Abhishek, Janu, Amit, Purandare, Nilendu, Prabhash, Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776
_version_ 1783274214285901824
author Noronha, Vanita
Patil, Vijay
Joshi, Amit
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
More, Sucheta
Goud, Supriya
Karpe, Ashay
Ramaswamy, Anant
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
author_facet Noronha, Vanita
Patil, Vijay
Joshi, Amit
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
More, Sucheta
Goud, Supriya
Karpe, Ashay
Ramaswamy, Anant
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
author_sort Noronha, Vanita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a study comparing pemetrexed–platinum combination versus oral TKI in EGFR mutation-positive patients in lung cancer. We analysed the impact of EGFR mutation subtype, specifically, exon 19 and 21 on the PFS and OS of patients treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) as first-line therapy. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126 and subsequently every two months till progression. Patients post-progression were treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (36%) had exon 21 mutation, while 92 patients (64%) had exon 19 mutation. Response rates in evaluable patients was 47.7% in exon 19 patients (41 patients, n = 86) and 42.9 % in exon 21 patients (18 patients, n = 42). There was a significant increase in median overall survival for patients with exon 19 mutations (24.5 months, 95% CI: 21.3–27.7 months ) over the exon 21-mutated patients (18.1 months, 95% Cl: 13.5–22.6 months, p = 0.002). This differential impact was due to second-line gefitinib having a differential outcome on these mutations. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have a differential impact on exon 19- or exon 21-mutated patients. However, second-line treatment with gefitinib has a favourable response and outcome in exon 19-mutated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5659826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56598262017-11-03 Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy Noronha, Vanita Patil, Vijay Joshi, Amit Chougule, Anuradha Bhattacharjee, Atanu Kumar, Rajiv More, Sucheta Goud, Supriya Karpe, Ashay Ramaswamy, Anant Pande, Nikhil Chandrasekharan, Arun Goel, Alok Talreja, Vikas Mahajan, Abhishek Janu, Amit Purandare, Nilendu Prabhash, Kumar Ecancermedicalscience Clinical Study BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation subtype is a recognised factor impacting outcomes of patients receiving oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence for the effect of this factor on outcomes in patients receiving pemetrexed is limited. METHODS: We completed a study comparing pemetrexed–platinum combination versus oral TKI in EGFR mutation-positive patients in lung cancer. We analysed the impact of EGFR mutation subtype, specifically, exon 19 and 21 on the PFS and OS of patients treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) as first-line therapy. Patients underwent axial imaging for response assessment on D42, D84, D126 and subsequently every two months till progression. Patients post-progression were treated with gefitinib. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (36%) had exon 21 mutation, while 92 patients (64%) had exon 19 mutation. Response rates in evaluable patients was 47.7% in exon 19 patients (41 patients, n = 86) and 42.9 % in exon 21 patients (18 patients, n = 42). There was a significant increase in median overall survival for patients with exon 19 mutations (24.5 months, 95% CI: 21.3–27.7 months ) over the exon 21-mutated patients (18.1 months, 95% Cl: 13.5–22.6 months, p = 0.002). This differential impact was due to second-line gefitinib having a differential outcome on these mutations. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy does not have a differential impact on exon 19- or exon 21-mutated patients. However, second-line treatment with gefitinib has a favourable response and outcome in exon 19-mutated patients. Cancer Intelligence 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5659826/ /pubmed/29104613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Noronha, Vanita
Patil, Vijay
Joshi, Amit
Chougule, Anuradha
Bhattacharjee, Atanu
Kumar, Rajiv
More, Sucheta
Goud, Supriya
Karpe, Ashay
Ramaswamy, Anant
Pande, Nikhil
Chandrasekharan, Arun
Goel, Alok
Talreja, Vikas
Mahajan, Abhishek
Janu, Amit
Purandare, Nilendu
Prabhash, Kumar
Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title_full Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title_fullStr Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title_short Impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 EGFR-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
title_sort impact of exon 19 versus exon 21 egfr-activating mutation on outcomes with upfront pemetrexed–carboplatin chemotherapy
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5659826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2017.776
work_keys_str_mv AT noronhavanita impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT patilvijay impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT joshiamit impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT chouguleanuradha impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT bhattacharjeeatanu impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT kumarrajiv impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT moresucheta impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT goudsupriya impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT karpeashay impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT ramaswamyanant impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT pandenikhil impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT chandrasekharanarun impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT goelalok impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT talrejavikas impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT mahajanabhishek impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT januamit impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT purandarenilendu impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy
AT prabhashkumar impactofexon19versusexon21egfractivatingmutationonoutcomeswithupfrontpemetrexedcarboplatinchemotherapy