Cargando…

Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI

In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate high-resolution 3D ultrasonography (hrUS), in-vivo micro-CT (μCT) and 9.4T MRI for the monitoring of tumor growth in an orthotopic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft model since there is a lack of validated, non-invasive imaging tools for this purp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linxweiler, Johannes, Körbel, Christina, Müller, Andreas, Jüngel, Eva, Blaheta, Roman, Heinzelmann, Joana, Stöckle, Michael, Junker, Kerstin, Menger, Michael D., Saar, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14759-1
_version_ 1783274244259446784
author Linxweiler, Johannes
Körbel, Christina
Müller, Andreas
Jüngel, Eva
Blaheta, Roman
Heinzelmann, Joana
Stöckle, Michael
Junker, Kerstin
Menger, Michael D.
Saar, Matthias
author_facet Linxweiler, Johannes
Körbel, Christina
Müller, Andreas
Jüngel, Eva
Blaheta, Roman
Heinzelmann, Joana
Stöckle, Michael
Junker, Kerstin
Menger, Michael D.
Saar, Matthias
author_sort Linxweiler, Johannes
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate high-resolution 3D ultrasonography (hrUS), in-vivo micro-CT (μCT) and 9.4T MRI for the monitoring of tumor growth in an orthotopic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft model since there is a lack of validated, non-invasive imaging tools for this purpose. 1 × 10(6) Caki-2 RCC cells were implanted under the renal capsule of 16 immunodeficient mice. Local and systemic tumor growth were monitored by regular hrUS, μCT and MRI examinations. Cells engrafted in all mice and gave rise to exponentially growing, solid tumors. All imaging techniques allowed to detect orthotopic tumors and to precisely calculate their volumes. While tumors appeared homogenously radiolucent in μCT, hrUS and MRI allowed for a better visualization of intratumoral structures and surrounding soft tissue. Examination time was the shortest for hrUS, followed by μCT and MRI. Tumor volumes determined by hrUS, μCT and MRI showed a very good correlation with each other and with caliper measurements at autopsy. 10 animals developed pulmonary metastases being well detectable by μCT and MRI. In conclusion, each technique has specific strengths and weaknesses, so the one(s) best suitable for a specific experiment may be chosen individually.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5660163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56601632017-11-01 Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI Linxweiler, Johannes Körbel, Christina Müller, Andreas Jüngel, Eva Blaheta, Roman Heinzelmann, Joana Stöckle, Michael Junker, Kerstin Menger, Michael D. Saar, Matthias Sci Rep Article In this study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate high-resolution 3D ultrasonography (hrUS), in-vivo micro-CT (μCT) and 9.4T MRI for the monitoring of tumor growth in an orthotopic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenograft model since there is a lack of validated, non-invasive imaging tools for this purpose. 1 × 10(6) Caki-2 RCC cells were implanted under the renal capsule of 16 immunodeficient mice. Local and systemic tumor growth were monitored by regular hrUS, μCT and MRI examinations. Cells engrafted in all mice and gave rise to exponentially growing, solid tumors. All imaging techniques allowed to detect orthotopic tumors and to precisely calculate their volumes. While tumors appeared homogenously radiolucent in μCT, hrUS and MRI allowed for a better visualization of intratumoral structures and surrounding soft tissue. Examination time was the shortest for hrUS, followed by μCT and MRI. Tumor volumes determined by hrUS, μCT and MRI showed a very good correlation with each other and with caliper measurements at autopsy. 10 animals developed pulmonary metastases being well detectable by μCT and MRI. In conclusion, each technique has specific strengths and weaknesses, so the one(s) best suitable for a specific experiment may be chosen individually. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5660163/ /pubmed/29079842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14759-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Linxweiler, Johannes
Körbel, Christina
Müller, Andreas
Jüngel, Eva
Blaheta, Roman
Heinzelmann, Joana
Stöckle, Michael
Junker, Kerstin
Menger, Michael D.
Saar, Matthias
Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title_full Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title_fullStr Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title_full_unstemmed Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title_short Experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3D ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-CT and 9.4T MRI
title_sort experimental imaging in orthotopic renal cell carcinoma xenograft models: comparative evaluation of high-resolution 3d ultrasonography, in-vivo micro-ct and 9.4t mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14759-1
work_keys_str_mv AT linxweilerjohannes experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT korbelchristina experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT mullerandreas experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT jungeleva experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT blahetaroman experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT heinzelmannjoana experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT stocklemichael experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT junkerkerstin experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT mengermichaeld experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri
AT saarmatthias experimentalimaginginorthotopicrenalcellcarcinomaxenograftmodelscomparativeevaluationofhighresolution3dultrasonographyinvivomicroctand94tmri