Cargando…

Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils

There is no universally accepted method for evaluating cadmium (Cd) bioavailability in soil. The diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) technique is a promising tool, but there is considerable debate about its suitability. The ability of this technique to estimate Cd bioavailability in soils was com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Yunchao, Nasir, Mubasher, Zhang, Yulin, Wu, Haiming, Guo, Honghong, Lv, Jialong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13820-3
_version_ 1783274261015691264
author Dai, Yunchao
Nasir, Mubasher
Zhang, Yulin
Wu, Haiming
Guo, Honghong
Lv, Jialong
author_facet Dai, Yunchao
Nasir, Mubasher
Zhang, Yulin
Wu, Haiming
Guo, Honghong
Lv, Jialong
author_sort Dai, Yunchao
collection PubMed
description There is no universally accepted method for evaluating cadmium (Cd) bioavailability in soil. The diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) technique is a promising tool, but there is considerable debate about its suitability. The ability of this technique to estimate Cd bioavailability in soils was compared with the abilities of other traditional chemical extraction techniques (soil solution, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), acetic acid (HAc), calcium chloride (CaCl(2)), and pseudo-total Cd methods) based on a greenhouse experiment using pakchoi (Brassica chinensis) grown in 15 soils from different provinces of China. In addition, we assessed whether these methods were independent of the soil properties. Correlations between the plant and soil Cd concentrations measured with the traditional extraction techniques were dependent on the pH and organic carbon (OC) content, indicating that these methods are influenced by the soil properties. In contrast, the DGT measurements were independent of the soil properties and showed a higher correlation coefficient compared to that of the traditional techniques. Hence, the DGT technique is better and should be preferable for assessing Cd biological effectiveness in different soil types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5660233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56602332017-11-01 Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils Dai, Yunchao Nasir, Mubasher Zhang, Yulin Wu, Haiming Guo, Honghong Lv, Jialong Sci Rep Article There is no universally accepted method for evaluating cadmium (Cd) bioavailability in soil. The diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) technique is a promising tool, but there is considerable debate about its suitability. The ability of this technique to estimate Cd bioavailability in soils was compared with the abilities of other traditional chemical extraction techniques (soil solution, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), acetic acid (HAc), calcium chloride (CaCl(2)), and pseudo-total Cd methods) based on a greenhouse experiment using pakchoi (Brassica chinensis) grown in 15 soils from different provinces of China. In addition, we assessed whether these methods were independent of the soil properties. Correlations between the plant and soil Cd concentrations measured with the traditional extraction techniques were dependent on the pH and organic carbon (OC) content, indicating that these methods are influenced by the soil properties. In contrast, the DGT measurements were independent of the soil properties and showed a higher correlation coefficient compared to that of the traditional techniques. Hence, the DGT technique is better and should be preferable for assessing Cd biological effectiveness in different soil types. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5660233/ /pubmed/29079727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13820-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Dai, Yunchao
Nasir, Mubasher
Zhang, Yulin
Wu, Haiming
Guo, Honghong
Lv, Jialong
Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title_full Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title_fullStr Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title_short Comparison of DGT with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to Brassica chinensis in different soils
title_sort comparison of dgt with traditional methods for assessing cadmium bioavailability to brassica chinensis in different soils
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13820-3
work_keys_str_mv AT daiyunchao comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils
AT nasirmubasher comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils
AT zhangyulin comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils
AT wuhaiming comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils
AT guohonghong comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils
AT lvjialong comparisonofdgtwithtraditionalmethodsforassessingcadmiumbioavailabilitytobrassicachinensisindifferentsoils