Cargando…
Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem?
PURPOSE: Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula (RI-RVF) is a chronic and serious condition with a significant influence on quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas of patients previously undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: Fifty...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27987097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1539-4 |
_version_ | 1783274367329763328 |
---|---|
author | Zelga, Piotr Tchórzewski, Marcin Zelga, Marta Sobotkowski, Janusz Dziki, Adam |
author_facet | Zelga, Piotr Tchórzewski, Marcin Zelga, Marta Sobotkowski, Janusz Dziki, Adam |
author_sort | Zelga, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula (RI-RVF) is a chronic and serious condition with a significant influence on quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas of patients previously undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: Fifty patients treated in the Gynaecological Radiotherapy Unit for gynaecologic malignancy and in the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery for RI-RVF between 2003 and 2013 were enrolled into a prospectively maintained database and underwent regular follow-up examinations in an outpatient clinic, during which surgical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Median age was 60 years (range 40–84 years). Cervical cancer was the most common cause of radiotherapy. Median time of fistula development after radiotherapy was 20 months (range 5–240 months). In 48 (96%) patients, only faecal diversion could be performed, while two patients underwent rectal resection. The fistula healed in six patients. Factors that correlated with fistula healing were a distance from the anal verge above 7 cm (p = 0.007 OR 18 95%CI 2.2609–14.3062) and creation of loop ileostomy (p = 0.08 OR 17 95%CI 1.2818–23.9701), whereas a prolonged course of radiotherapy of more than 6 weeks (p = 0.047) correlated negatively. In multivariate analysis, only distance from the anal verge remained significant (p = 0.031 OR 2.35 95%CI 1.0422–5.2924). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas needs to be tailored individually to each patient. Faecal diversion remains the simplest and safest method of treating RI-RVF, especially in the group of patients who cannot undergo complicated surgical procedures, and offers acceptable quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5660831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56608312017-11-13 Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? Zelga, Piotr Tchórzewski, Marcin Zelga, Marta Sobotkowski, Janusz Dziki, Adam Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula (RI-RVF) is a chronic and serious condition with a significant influence on quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistulas of patients previously undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: Fifty patients treated in the Gynaecological Radiotherapy Unit for gynaecologic malignancy and in the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery for RI-RVF between 2003 and 2013 were enrolled into a prospectively maintained database and underwent regular follow-up examinations in an outpatient clinic, during which surgical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Median age was 60 years (range 40–84 years). Cervical cancer was the most common cause of radiotherapy. Median time of fistula development after radiotherapy was 20 months (range 5–240 months). In 48 (96%) patients, only faecal diversion could be performed, while two patients underwent rectal resection. The fistula healed in six patients. Factors that correlated with fistula healing were a distance from the anal verge above 7 cm (p = 0.007 OR 18 95%CI 2.2609–14.3062) and creation of loop ileostomy (p = 0.08 OR 17 95%CI 1.2818–23.9701), whereas a prolonged course of radiotherapy of more than 6 weeks (p = 0.047) correlated negatively. In multivariate analysis, only distance from the anal verge remained significant (p = 0.031 OR 2.35 95%CI 1.0422–5.2924). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas needs to be tailored individually to each patient. Faecal diversion remains the simplest and safest method of treating RI-RVF, especially in the group of patients who cannot undergo complicated surgical procedures, and offers acceptable quality of life. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-12-16 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5660831/ /pubmed/27987097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1539-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zelga, Piotr Tchórzewski, Marcin Zelga, Marta Sobotkowski, Janusz Dziki, Adam Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title | Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title_full | Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title_fullStr | Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title_short | Radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
title_sort | radiation-induced rectovaginal fistulas in locally advanced gynaecological malignancies—new patients, old problem? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27987097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1539-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zelgapiotr radiationinducedrectovaginalfistulasinlocallyadvancedgynaecologicalmalignanciesnewpatientsoldproblem AT tchorzewskimarcin radiationinducedrectovaginalfistulasinlocallyadvancedgynaecologicalmalignanciesnewpatientsoldproblem AT zelgamarta radiationinducedrectovaginalfistulasinlocallyadvancedgynaecologicalmalignanciesnewpatientsoldproblem AT sobotkowskijanusz radiationinducedrectovaginalfistulasinlocallyadvancedgynaecologicalmalignanciesnewpatientsoldproblem AT dzikiadam radiationinducedrectovaginalfistulasinlocallyadvancedgynaecologicalmalignanciesnewpatientsoldproblem |