Cargando…

Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study

INTRODUCTION: The heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) affects the efficiency of tests available to detect it. The objective of this study was to assess four phenotypic tests used to detect MRSA. METHODS: This is an analytical comparative study conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali, Bilal, Naser Eldin, Osman, Omran Fadl, Magzoub, Magzoub Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187950
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.281.9016
_version_ 1783274380708544512
author Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali
Bilal, Naser Eldin
Osman, Omran Fadl
Magzoub, Magzoub Abbas
author_facet Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali
Bilal, Naser Eldin
Osman, Omran Fadl
Magzoub, Magzoub Abbas
author_sort Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) affects the efficiency of tests available to detect it. The objective of this study was to assess four phenotypic tests used to detect MRSA. METHODS: This is an analytical comparative study conducted among sudanese patients during period from May 2012 to July 2014, Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated and identified by conventional methods, and then confirmed by PCR detection of coagulase gene. PCR detection of mecA gene was used as a gold standard to assess oxacillin resistance screen agar base (ORSAB), oxacillin disc, cefoxitin disc (at different temperatures and incubation periods) and MRSA-latex agglutination test. S.aureus ATCC 25923 was used as control. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: MRSA- latex agglutination was the most accurate test; it showed 100% of both sensitivity and specificity, followed by cefoxitin disc with sensitivity of 98.48% and specificity of 100%. However, both of oxacillin disc and oxacillin resistance screen agar base showed less accurate results, and were affected by incubation periods. Oxacillin disc after 24 h incubation both at 30°C and 35°C showed sensitivity and specificity values of 87.88% and 96.23%, respectively. However, after 48h incubation the test at 30°C showed sensitivity and specificity values of 89.39%, and 94.34%, respectively. At 35°C (48h) it showed values of 89.39%, 92.45% respectively. Specificity of ORSAB was more than oxacillin disc at 35°C after 24h incubation 98.11% and 96.23%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRSA- latex agglutination and cefoxitin disc diffusion tests are recommended for routine detection of MRSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5660905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56609052017-11-29 Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali Bilal, Naser Eldin Osman, Omran Fadl Magzoub, Magzoub Abbas Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: The heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) affects the efficiency of tests available to detect it. The objective of this study was to assess four phenotypic tests used to detect MRSA. METHODS: This is an analytical comparative study conducted among sudanese patients during period from May 2012 to July 2014, Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated and identified by conventional methods, and then confirmed by PCR detection of coagulase gene. PCR detection of mecA gene was used as a gold standard to assess oxacillin resistance screen agar base (ORSAB), oxacillin disc, cefoxitin disc (at different temperatures and incubation periods) and MRSA-latex agglutination test. S.aureus ATCC 25923 was used as control. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: MRSA- latex agglutination was the most accurate test; it showed 100% of both sensitivity and specificity, followed by cefoxitin disc with sensitivity of 98.48% and specificity of 100%. However, both of oxacillin disc and oxacillin resistance screen agar base showed less accurate results, and were affected by incubation periods. Oxacillin disc after 24 h incubation both at 30°C and 35°C showed sensitivity and specificity values of 87.88% and 96.23%, respectively. However, after 48h incubation the test at 30°C showed sensitivity and specificity values of 89.39%, and 94.34%, respectively. At 35°C (48h) it showed values of 89.39%, 92.45% respectively. Specificity of ORSAB was more than oxacillin disc at 35°C after 24h incubation 98.11% and 96.23%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRSA- latex agglutination and cefoxitin disc diffusion tests are recommended for routine detection of MRSA. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2017-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5660905/ /pubmed/29187950 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.281.9016 Text en © Omer Mohammed Ali Ibrahim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ibrahim, Omer Mohammed Ali
Bilal, Naser Eldin
Osman, Omran Fadl
Magzoub, Magzoub Abbas
Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title_full Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title_fullStr Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title_short Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
title_sort assessment of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5660905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187950
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.281.9016
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimomermohammedali assessmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusdetectionmethodsanalyticalcomparativestudy
AT bilalnasereldin assessmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusdetectionmethodsanalyticalcomparativestudy
AT osmanomranfadl assessmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusdetectionmethodsanalyticalcomparativestudy
AT magzoubmagzoubabbas assessmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusdetectionmethodsanalyticalcomparativestudy