Cargando…
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104382 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443 |
_version_ | 1783274402597568512 |
---|---|
author | Sunitha, B Puppala, Ravindar Kethineni, Balaji K Mallela, Manoj Peddi, Ravigna Tarasingh, P |
author_facet | Sunitha, B Puppala, Ravindar Kethineni, Balaji K Mallela, Manoj Peddi, Ravigna Tarasingh, P |
author_sort | Sunitha, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The present study is aimed to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of FC, pulpotec, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and emdogain (EMD) as pulpotomy medicaments in human primary molars. DESIGN: A sample of 21 patients with 84 teeth were selected. All the patients have at least four teeth eligible for pulpotomy according to selection criteria. In each mouth, the teeth selected were randomly allocated into four groups with 21 each. RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up, the clinical success rates were FC (94%), pulpotec (94%), MTA (100%), and EMD (83%) and radiographically FC (88%), pulpotec (83%), MTA (94%), and EMD (72%), which were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The outcome of this study demonstrates MTA has a high success rate compared with FC, pulpotec, and EMD as pulpotomy agent. In addition, MTA, pulpotec, and EMD can be considered as alternatives to FC as pulpotomy agent. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sunitha B, Puppala R, Kethineni B, Mallela MK, Peddi R, Tarasingh P. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):240-244. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5661036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56610362017-11-03 Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study Sunitha, B Puppala, Ravindar Kethineni, Balaji K Mallela, Manoj Peddi, Ravigna Tarasingh, P Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The present study is aimed to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of FC, pulpotec, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and emdogain (EMD) as pulpotomy medicaments in human primary molars. DESIGN: A sample of 21 patients with 84 teeth were selected. All the patients have at least four teeth eligible for pulpotomy according to selection criteria. In each mouth, the teeth selected were randomly allocated into four groups with 21 each. RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up, the clinical success rates were FC (94%), pulpotec (94%), MTA (100%), and EMD (83%) and radiographically FC (88%), pulpotec (83%), MTA (94%), and EMD (72%), which were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The outcome of this study demonstrates MTA has a high success rate compared with FC, pulpotec, and EMD as pulpotomy agent. In addition, MTA, pulpotec, and EMD can be considered as alternatives to FC as pulpotomy agent. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sunitha B, Puppala R, Kethineni B, Mallela MK, Peddi R, Tarasingh P. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):240-244. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5661036/ /pubmed/29104382 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443 Text en Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sunitha, B Puppala, Ravindar Kethineni, Balaji K Mallela, Manoj Peddi, Ravigna Tarasingh, P Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title | Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title_full | Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title_short | Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study |
title_sort | clinical and radiographic evaluation of four different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a longitudinal study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104382 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunithab clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy AT puppalaravindar clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy AT kethinenibalaji clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy AT kmallelamanoj clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy AT peddiravigna clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy AT tarasinghp clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy |