Cargando…

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunitha, B, Puppala, Ravindar, Kethineni, Balaji, K Mallela, Manoj, Peddi, Ravigna, Tarasingh, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104382
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443
_version_ 1783274402597568512
author Sunitha, B
Puppala, Ravindar
Kethineni, Balaji
K Mallela, Manoj
Peddi, Ravigna
Tarasingh, P
author_facet Sunitha, B
Puppala, Ravindar
Kethineni, Balaji
K Mallela, Manoj
Peddi, Ravigna
Tarasingh, P
author_sort Sunitha, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The present study is aimed to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of FC, pulpotec, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and emdogain (EMD) as pulpotomy medicaments in human primary molars. DESIGN: A sample of 21 patients with 84 teeth were selected. All the patients have at least four teeth eligible for pulpotomy according to selection criteria. In each mouth, the teeth selected were randomly allocated into four groups with 21 each. RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up, the clinical success rates were FC (94%), pulpotec (94%), MTA (100%), and EMD (83%) and radiographically FC (88%), pulpotec (83%), MTA (94%), and EMD (72%), which were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The outcome of this study demonstrates MTA has a high success rate compared with FC, pulpotec, and EMD as pulpotomy agent. In addition, MTA, pulpotec, and EMD can be considered as alternatives to FC as pulpotomy agent. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sunitha B, Puppala R, Kethineni B, Mallela MK, Peddi R, Tarasingh P. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):240-244.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56610362017-11-03 Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study Sunitha, B Puppala, Ravindar Kethineni, Balaji K Mallela, Manoj Peddi, Ravigna Tarasingh, P Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The medicament formocresol (FC) used for pulpotomy in primary teeth has great concerns regarding its toxicity due to one of its constituent formaldehyde which acts by tissue fixation. Therefore, new medicaments were introduced which claimed preservation and regeneration of pulp. AIM: The present study is aimed to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of FC, pulpotec, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and emdogain (EMD) as pulpotomy medicaments in human primary molars. DESIGN: A sample of 21 patients with 84 teeth were selected. All the patients have at least four teeth eligible for pulpotomy according to selection criteria. In each mouth, the teeth selected were randomly allocated into four groups with 21 each. RESULTS: After 24 months of follow-up, the clinical success rates were FC (94%), pulpotec (94%), MTA (100%), and EMD (83%) and radiographically FC (88%), pulpotec (83%), MTA (94%), and EMD (72%), which were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The outcome of this study demonstrates MTA has a high success rate compared with FC, pulpotec, and EMD as pulpotomy agent. In addition, MTA, pulpotec, and EMD can be considered as alternatives to FC as pulpotomy agent. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sunitha B, Puppala R, Kethineni B, Mallela MK, Peddi R, Tarasingh P. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):240-244. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5661036/ /pubmed/29104382 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443 Text en Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Sunitha, B
Puppala, Ravindar
Kethineni, Balaji
K Mallela, Manoj
Peddi, Ravigna
Tarasingh, P
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title_full Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title_short Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Four Different Pulpotomy Agents in Primary Molars: A Longitudinal Study
title_sort clinical and radiographic evaluation of four different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a longitudinal study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104382
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1443
work_keys_str_mv AT sunithab clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy
AT puppalaravindar clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy
AT kethinenibalaji clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy
AT kmallelamanoj clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy
AT peddiravigna clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy
AT tarasinghp clinicalandradiographicevaluationoffourdifferentpulpotomyagentsinprimarymolarsalongitudinalstudy