Cargando…

Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Oral clefts are among the common congenital birth defects with a broad phenotypic gamut. Since the epidermal ridges of the fingers and palms as well as the facial structures like lip, alveolus, and palate are formed from the same embryonic tissues during the same embryonic period, the ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: S Mayall, Sandeep, Chaudhary, Seema, Kaur, Harsimran, Manuja, Naveen, Ravishankar, Telegi, A Sinha, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104383
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1444
_version_ 1783274402829303808
author S Mayall, Sandeep
Chaudhary, Seema
Kaur, Harsimran
Manuja, Naveen
Ravishankar, Telegi
A Sinha, Ashish
author_facet S Mayall, Sandeep
Chaudhary, Seema
Kaur, Harsimran
Manuja, Naveen
Ravishankar, Telegi
A Sinha, Ashish
author_sort S Mayall, Sandeep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral clefts are among the common congenital birth defects with a broad phenotypic gamut. Since the epidermal ridges of the fingers and palms as well as the facial structures like lip, alveolus, and palate are formed from the same embryonic tissues during the same embryonic period, the genetic and environmental factors responsible for causing cleft lip and palate might also affect dermatoglyphic patterns. AIM: Thus, study was undertaken to compare the dermato-glyphic pattern of children with orofacial clefts and normal children and to determine the correlation of dermatoglyphics with orofacial clefts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total study sample consisted of 120 children in the age group of 3 to 16 years being divided into study and control groups. Dermatoglyphic data obtained from both control and study groups were then subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Statistically no significant difference was found in the dermatoglyphic pattern and atd angle for both the groups. CONCLUSION: It was observed that dermatoglyphics in orofacial clefts may not be distinctive. Further, large-scale studies are recommended to confirm the same. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mayall SS, Chaudhary S, Kaur H, Manuja N, Ravishankar T, Sinha AA. Comparison of Derma-toglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):245-249.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56610372017-11-03 Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study S Mayall, Sandeep Chaudhary, Seema Kaur, Harsimran Manuja, Naveen Ravishankar, Telegi A Sinha, Ashish Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Oral clefts are among the common congenital birth defects with a broad phenotypic gamut. Since the epidermal ridges of the fingers and palms as well as the facial structures like lip, alveolus, and palate are formed from the same embryonic tissues during the same embryonic period, the genetic and environmental factors responsible for causing cleft lip and palate might also affect dermatoglyphic patterns. AIM: Thus, study was undertaken to compare the dermato-glyphic pattern of children with orofacial clefts and normal children and to determine the correlation of dermatoglyphics with orofacial clefts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total study sample consisted of 120 children in the age group of 3 to 16 years being divided into study and control groups. Dermatoglyphic data obtained from both control and study groups were then subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Statistically no significant difference was found in the dermatoglyphic pattern and atd angle for both the groups. CONCLUSION: It was observed that dermatoglyphics in orofacial clefts may not be distinctive. Further, large-scale studies are recommended to confirm the same. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mayall SS, Chaudhary S, Kaur H, Manuja N, Ravishankar T, Sinha AA. Comparison of Derma-toglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(3):245-249. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2017 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5661037/ /pubmed/29104383 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1444 Text en Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
S Mayall, Sandeep
Chaudhary, Seema
Kaur, Harsimran
Manuja, Naveen
Ravishankar, Telegi
A Sinha, Ashish
Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Comparison of Dermatoglyphic Pattern among Cleft and Noncleft Children: A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort comparison of dermatoglyphic pattern among cleft and noncleft children: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104383
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1444
work_keys_str_mv AT smayallsandeep comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT chaudharyseema comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT kaurharsimran comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT manujanaveen comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT ravishankartelegi comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT asinhaashish comparisonofdermatoglyphicpatternamongcleftandnoncleftchildrenacrosssectionalstudy