Cargando…

Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND: Interventional Pain Management (IPM) is performed in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics (MCPC), including a range of invasive techniques to diagnose and treat chronic pain (CP) conditions. Current patterns of use of those techniques in MCPC have not yet been reported. OBJECTIVE: We a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouvinhas, Cláudia, Veiga, Dalila, Mendonça, Liliane, Sampaio, Rute, Azevedo, Luís Filipe, Castro-Lopes, José Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8402413
_version_ 1783274412768755712
author Gouvinhas, Cláudia
Veiga, Dalila
Mendonça, Liliane
Sampaio, Rute
Azevedo, Luís Filipe
Castro-Lopes, José Manuel
author_facet Gouvinhas, Cláudia
Veiga, Dalila
Mendonça, Liliane
Sampaio, Rute
Azevedo, Luís Filipe
Castro-Lopes, José Manuel
author_sort Gouvinhas, Cláudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interventional Pain Management (IPM) is performed in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics (MCPC), including a range of invasive techniques to diagnose and treat chronic pain (CP) conditions. Current patterns of use of those techniques in MCPC have not yet been reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the use of IPM and other therapeutic procedures performed on-site at four Portuguese MCPC. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up was performed in adult patients. A structured case report form was systematically completed at baseline and six and 12 months. RESULTS: Among 808 patients referred to the MCPC, 17.2% had been prescribed IPM. Patients with IPM were on average younger and had longer CP duration and lower levels of maximum pain and pain interference/disability. The three main diagnoses were low back pain (n = 28), postoperative CP, and knee pain (n = 16 each). From 195 IPM prescribed, nerve blocks (n = 108), radiofrequency (n = 31), and viscosupplementation (n = 22) were the most prevalent. Some IPM techniques were only available in few MCPC. One MCPC did not provide IPM. CONCLUSIONS: IPM are seldom prescribed in Portuguese MCPC. Further studies on IPM safety and effectiveness are necessary for clear understanding the role of these techniques in CP management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56610792017-11-21 Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up Gouvinhas, Cláudia Veiga, Dalila Mendonça, Liliane Sampaio, Rute Azevedo, Luís Filipe Castro-Lopes, José Manuel Pain Res Treat Research Article BACKGROUND: Interventional Pain Management (IPM) is performed in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics (MCPC), including a range of invasive techniques to diagnose and treat chronic pain (CP) conditions. Current patterns of use of those techniques in MCPC have not yet been reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the use of IPM and other therapeutic procedures performed on-site at four Portuguese MCPC. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up was performed in adult patients. A structured case report form was systematically completed at baseline and six and 12 months. RESULTS: Among 808 patients referred to the MCPC, 17.2% had been prescribed IPM. Patients with IPM were on average younger and had longer CP duration and lower levels of maximum pain and pain interference/disability. The three main diagnoses were low back pain (n = 28), postoperative CP, and knee pain (n = 16 each). From 195 IPM prescribed, nerve blocks (n = 108), radiofrequency (n = 31), and viscosupplementation (n = 22) were the most prevalent. Some IPM techniques were only available in few MCPC. One MCPC did not provide IPM. CONCLUSIONS: IPM are seldom prescribed in Portuguese MCPC. Further studies on IPM safety and effectiveness are necessary for clear understanding the role of these techniques in CP management. Hindawi 2017 2017-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5661079/ /pubmed/29163990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8402413 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cláudia Gouvinhas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gouvinhas, Cláudia
Veiga, Dalila
Mendonça, Liliane
Sampaio, Rute
Azevedo, Luís Filipe
Castro-Lopes, José Manuel
Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title_full Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title_short Interventional Pain Management in Multidisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up
title_sort interventional pain management in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics: a prospective multicenter cohort study with one-year follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8402413
work_keys_str_mv AT gouvinhasclaudia interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup
AT veigadalila interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup
AT mendoncaliliane interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup
AT sampaiorute interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup
AT azevedoluisfilipe interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup
AT castrolopesjosemanuel interventionalpainmanagementinmultidisciplinarychronicpainclinicsaprospectivemulticentercohortstudywithoneyearfollowup