Cargando…

Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan

INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumor in women in Kazakhstan. In the past two decades, endoscopic surgery has played an important role in the development of gynecologic surgery, particularly in the treatment of uterine fibroids. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imankulova, Balkenzhe, Mereke, Alibek, Kamzaeva, Nazira, Ukybassova, Talshyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138718
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2015.232
_version_ 1783274441169436672
author Imankulova, Balkenzhe
Mereke, Alibek
Kamzaeva, Nazira
Ukybassova, Talshyn
author_facet Imankulova, Balkenzhe
Mereke, Alibek
Kamzaeva, Nazira
Ukybassova, Talshyn
author_sort Imankulova, Balkenzhe
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumor in women in Kazakhstan. In the past two decades, endoscopic surgery has played an important role in the development of gynecologic surgery, particularly in the treatment of uterine fibroids. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to myomectomy was more effective in decreasing fibroid size and improving surgical outcomes in a pilot study of women in Kazakhstan. METHODS: This pilot investigation included 24 patients separated into 2 groups: medication group (pre-treatment with GnRHa – 13 patients) and embolization group (pre-treatment with UAE – 11 patients). All patients had uterine fibroids, 3–10 cm in diameter, and were treated with myomectomy at the National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Astana, Kazakhstan. All patient data were obtained by a retrospective medical records review. Descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize participant demographics data. Independent t-tests were used to analyze continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used where appropriate for count data. RESULTS: The group treated with GnRHa had an operating time of 40±10 minutes longer than the group treated with UAE, due to the peri-operative difficulties encountered by surgeons in detecting the layer between the myometrium and fibroid capsule. The group treated with UAE experienced better patient outcomes (less blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced use of anesthesia) and was a technically easier surgery due to visible differences in uterine layers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that both treatments (GnRHa and UAE) were effective for fibroid shrinking, embolization resulted in more optimal surgical time and improved patient outcomes. Results of this pilot study need to be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial, specifically focused on Kazakhstan and the Central Asian Region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56612002017-11-14 Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan Imankulova, Balkenzhe Mereke, Alibek Kamzaeva, Nazira Ukybassova, Talshyn Cent Asian J Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumor in women in Kazakhstan. In the past two decades, endoscopic surgery has played an important role in the development of gynecologic surgery, particularly in the treatment of uterine fibroids. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to myomectomy was more effective in decreasing fibroid size and improving surgical outcomes in a pilot study of women in Kazakhstan. METHODS: This pilot investigation included 24 patients separated into 2 groups: medication group (pre-treatment with GnRHa – 13 patients) and embolization group (pre-treatment with UAE – 11 patients). All patients had uterine fibroids, 3–10 cm in diameter, and were treated with myomectomy at the National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Astana, Kazakhstan. All patient data were obtained by a retrospective medical records review. Descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize participant demographics data. Independent t-tests were used to analyze continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used where appropriate for count data. RESULTS: The group treated with GnRHa had an operating time of 40±10 minutes longer than the group treated with UAE, due to the peri-operative difficulties encountered by surgeons in detecting the layer between the myometrium and fibroid capsule. The group treated with UAE experienced better patient outcomes (less blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced use of anesthesia) and was a technically easier surgery due to visible differences in uterine layers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that both treatments (GnRHa and UAE) were effective for fibroid shrinking, embolization resulted in more optimal surgical time and improved patient outcomes. Results of this pilot study need to be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial, specifically focused on Kazakhstan and the Central Asian Region. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5661200/ /pubmed/29138718 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2015.232 Text en New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . (CC-BY)
spellingShingle Research
Imankulova, Balkenzhe
Mereke, Alibek
Kamzaeva, Nazira
Ukybassova, Talshyn
Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title_full Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title_fullStr Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title_short Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan
title_sort comparing the use of uterine artery embolization to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in shrinking fibroid size: a pilot study in kazakhstan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138718
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/cajgh.2015.232
work_keys_str_mv AT imankulovabalkenzhe comparingtheuseofuterinearteryembolizationtogonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistsinshrinkingfibroidsizeapilotstudyinkazakhstan
AT merekealibek comparingtheuseofuterinearteryembolizationtogonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistsinshrinkingfibroidsizeapilotstudyinkazakhstan
AT kamzaevanazira comparingtheuseofuterinearteryembolizationtogonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistsinshrinkingfibroidsizeapilotstudyinkazakhstan
AT ukybassovatalshyn comparingtheuseofuterinearteryembolizationtogonadotropinreleasinghormoneagonistsinshrinkingfibroidsizeapilotstudyinkazakhstan