Cargando…

Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is of concern in the postoperative period after cardiac surgeries. Invasive ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation [IPPV]) carries the risks and complications of intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). AIMS: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elgebaly, Ahmed Said
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28994676
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_95_17
_version_ 1783274456232230912
author Elgebaly, Ahmed Said
author_facet Elgebaly, Ahmed Said
author_sort Elgebaly, Ahmed Said
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is of concern in the postoperative period after cardiac surgeries. Invasive ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation [IPPV]) carries the risks and complications of intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). AIMS: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is an alternative method and as effective as IPPV in treating insufficiency of respiration with less complications and minimal effects on respiratory and hemodynamic parameters next to open-heart surgery. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized and controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were divided into two equal groups: Group I (IPPV) and Group II (NIPPV). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), arterial blood gas, weaning time, reintubation, tracheotomy rate, MV time, postoperative hospital stay, and ventilator-associated pneumonia during the period of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference in HR between groups with higher in Group I at 30 and 60 min and at 12 and 24 h. According to MAP, it started to increase significantly at hypoxemia, 15 min, 30 min, 4 h, 12 h, and at 24 h which was higher in Group I also. RR, PaO(2), and PaCO(2) showed significant higher in Group II at 15, 30, and 60 min and 4 h. According to pH, there was a significant difference between groups at 15, 30, and 60 min and at 4, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. SpO(2) showed higher significant values in Group I at 15 and 30 min and at 12 h postoperatively. Duration of postoperative supportive ventilation was higher in Group I than that of Group II with statistically significant difference. Complications were statistically insignificant between Group I and Group II. CONCLUSION: Our study showed superiority of invasive over noninvasive mode of ventilator support. However, NIPPV (bilevel positive airway pressure) was proved to be a safe method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56613102017-11-09 Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery? Elgebaly, Ahmed Said Ann Card Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is of concern in the postoperative period after cardiac surgeries. Invasive ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation [IPPV]) carries the risks and complications of intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). AIMS: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is an alternative method and as effective as IPPV in treating insufficiency of respiration with less complications and minimal effects on respiratory and hemodynamic parameters next to open-heart surgery. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized and controlled study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were divided into two equal groups: Group I (IPPV) and Group II (NIPPV). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), arterial blood gas, weaning time, reintubation, tracheotomy rate, MV time, postoperative hospital stay, and ventilator-associated pneumonia during the period of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference in HR between groups with higher in Group I at 30 and 60 min and at 12 and 24 h. According to MAP, it started to increase significantly at hypoxemia, 15 min, 30 min, 4 h, 12 h, and at 24 h which was higher in Group I also. RR, PaO(2), and PaCO(2) showed significant higher in Group II at 15, 30, and 60 min and 4 h. According to pH, there was a significant difference between groups at 15, 30, and 60 min and at 4, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. SpO(2) showed higher significant values in Group I at 15 and 30 min and at 12 h postoperatively. Duration of postoperative supportive ventilation was higher in Group I than that of Group II with statistically significant difference. Complications were statistically insignificant between Group I and Group II. CONCLUSION: Our study showed superiority of invasive over noninvasive mode of ventilator support. However, NIPPV (bilevel positive airway pressure) was proved to be a safe method. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5661310/ /pubmed/28994676 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_95_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Elgebaly, Ahmed Said
Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title_full Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title_fullStr Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title_short Does Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Improve Outcome of Acute Respiratory Failure after Open-heart Surgery?
title_sort does bilevel positive airway pressure improve outcome of acute respiratory failure after open-heart surgery?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28994676
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_95_17
work_keys_str_mv AT elgebalyahmedsaid doesbilevelpositiveairwaypressureimproveoutcomeofacuterespiratoryfailureafteropenheartsurgery