Cargando…

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

BACKGROUND: The ideal anaesthetic technique for management of paediatric patients scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterisation is still not standardised. AIM: To compare the effects of ketamine-propofol and ketamine-dexmedetomidine combinations on hemodynamic parameters and recovery time in paediatr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Vidya Sagar, Kollu, Sandeep S, Sharma, Ram Murti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28994677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_16_17
_version_ 1783274456467111936
author Joshi, Vidya Sagar
Kollu, Sandeep S
Sharma, Ram Murti
author_facet Joshi, Vidya Sagar
Kollu, Sandeep S
Sharma, Ram Murti
author_sort Joshi, Vidya Sagar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ideal anaesthetic technique for management of paediatric patients scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterisation is still not standardised. AIM: To compare the effects of ketamine-propofol and ketamine-dexmedetomidine combinations on hemodynamic parameters and recovery time in paediatric patients undergoing minor procedures and cardiac catheterisation under sedation for various congenital heart diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 children of either sex undergoing cardiac catheterisation were randomly assigned into two groups Dexmedetomidine-ketamine group (DK) and Propofol-ketamine (PK) of 30 patients each. All patients were premedicated with glycopyrrolate and midazolam (0.05mg/kg) intravenously 5-10 min before anaesthetic induction. Group ‘DK’received dexmedetomidineiv infusion 1 μg/kg over 10 min + ketamine1mg/kg bolus, followed by iv infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5μg/kg/hr and of ketamine1 mg/kg/hr. Group ‘PK’ received propofol 1mg/kg and ketamine 1mg/kg/hr for induction followed by iv infusion of propofol 100 μg/kg/hr and ketamine 1 mg/kg/hr for maintenance. Haemodynamic parameters and recovery time was recorded postoperatively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Independent sample t test was used to compare the statistical significance of continuous variables of both the groups. Chi square test was used for numerical data like gender. Fischer exact test was applied for non parametric data like ketamine consumption. RESULTS: We observed that heart rate in dexmedetomidine (DK) group was significantly lower during the initial 25 mins after induction compared to the propofol (PK) group. Recovery was prolonged in the DK group compared to the PK group (40.88 vs. 22.28 min). Even ketamine boluses consumption was higher in DK group. CONCLUSION: Use of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination is a safe alternative, without any hemodynamic orrespiratory effects during the cardiac catheterization procedure but with some delayed recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56613112017-11-09 Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Joshi, Vidya Sagar Kollu, Sandeep S Sharma, Ram Murti Ann Card Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: The ideal anaesthetic technique for management of paediatric patients scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterisation is still not standardised. AIM: To compare the effects of ketamine-propofol and ketamine-dexmedetomidine combinations on hemodynamic parameters and recovery time in paediatric patients undergoing minor procedures and cardiac catheterisation under sedation for various congenital heart diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 children of either sex undergoing cardiac catheterisation were randomly assigned into two groups Dexmedetomidine-ketamine group (DK) and Propofol-ketamine (PK) of 30 patients each. All patients were premedicated with glycopyrrolate and midazolam (0.05mg/kg) intravenously 5-10 min before anaesthetic induction. Group ‘DK’received dexmedetomidineiv infusion 1 μg/kg over 10 min + ketamine1mg/kg bolus, followed by iv infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5μg/kg/hr and of ketamine1 mg/kg/hr. Group ‘PK’ received propofol 1mg/kg and ketamine 1mg/kg/hr for induction followed by iv infusion of propofol 100 μg/kg/hr and ketamine 1 mg/kg/hr for maintenance. Haemodynamic parameters and recovery time was recorded postoperatively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Independent sample t test was used to compare the statistical significance of continuous variables of both the groups. Chi square test was used for numerical data like gender. Fischer exact test was applied for non parametric data like ketamine consumption. RESULTS: We observed that heart rate in dexmedetomidine (DK) group was significantly lower during the initial 25 mins after induction compared to the propofol (PK) group. Recovery was prolonged in the DK group compared to the PK group (40.88 vs. 22.28 min). Even ketamine boluses consumption was higher in DK group. CONCLUSION: Use of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination is a safe alternative, without any hemodynamic orrespiratory effects during the cardiac catheterization procedure but with some delayed recovery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5661311/ /pubmed/28994677 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_16_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joshi, Vidya Sagar
Kollu, Sandeep S
Sharma, Ram Murti
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_full Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_fullStr Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_short Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine versus Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children Undergoing Minor Cardiac Procedures in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_sort comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine versus propofol and ketamine for procedural sedation in children undergoing minor cardiac procedures in cardiac catheterization laboratory
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28994677
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_16_17
work_keys_str_mv AT joshividyasagar comparisonofdexmedetomidineandketamineversuspropofolandketamineforproceduralsedationinchildrenundergoingminorcardiacproceduresincardiaccatheterizationlaboratory
AT kollusandeeps comparisonofdexmedetomidineandketamineversuspropofolandketamineforproceduralsedationinchildrenundergoingminorcardiacproceduresincardiaccatheterizationlaboratory
AT sharmarammurti comparisonofdexmedetomidineandketamineversuspropofolandketamineforproceduralsedationinchildrenundergoingminorcardiacproceduresincardiaccatheterizationlaboratory