Cargando…

The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look

Syntactic satiation is the phenomenon where some sentences that initially seem ungrammatical appear more acceptable after repeated exposures (Snyder, 2000). We investigated satiation by manipulating two factors known to affect syntactic priming, a phenomenon where recent exposure to a grammatical st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, Monica L., Kaiser, Elsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01851
_version_ 1783274477417660416
author Do, Monica L.
Kaiser, Elsi
author_facet Do, Monica L.
Kaiser, Elsi
author_sort Do, Monica L.
collection PubMed
description Syntactic satiation is the phenomenon where some sentences that initially seem ungrammatical appear more acceptable after repeated exposures (Snyder, 2000). We investigated satiation by manipulating two factors known to affect syntactic priming, a phenomenon where recent exposure to a grammatical structure facilitates subsequent processing of that structure (Bock, 1986). Specifically, we manipulated (i) Proximity of exposure (number of sentences between primes and targets) and (ii) Lexical repetition (type of phrase repeated across primes and targets). Experiment 1 investigated whether acceptability ratings of Complex-NP Constraint (CNPC) and Subject islands improve as consequence of these variables. If so, priming and satiation may be linked. When primes were separated from targets by one sentence, CNPC islands’ acceptability was improved by a preceding island of the same type, but Subject islands’ acceptability was not. When prime-target pairs were separated by five sentences, we found no improvement for either island type. Experiment 2 asked whether improvements in Experiment 1 reflected online processing or offline end-of-sentence effects. We used a self-paced reading paradigm to diagnose online structure-building and processing facilitation (Ivanova et al., 2012a) during processing. We found priming for Subject islands when primes and targets were close together, but not when they were further apart. No effects were detected when CNPC islands were close together, but there was a localized effect when sentences were further apart. The disjunction between Experiments 1 and 2 suggests repetition of the structure in Subject islands facilitated online processing but did not ‘spill over’ to acceptability ratings. Meanwhile, results for CNPC islands suggest that acceptability rating improvements in Experiment 1 may be driven by factors distinct from online processing facilitation. Together, our experiments show that satiation may not be a one-size-fit-all phenomenon but, instead, appears to manifest itself differently for different types of structures. Priming is possible and may be linked to satiation in some purportedly “unbuildable” structures (e.g., Subject islands), but not for all types (e.g., CNPC islands). Despite this, it appears that while the types of mechanisms targeting different island types are distinct, they are nevertheless similarly sensitive to the proximity between individual exposures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56614272017-11-08 The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look Do, Monica L. Kaiser, Elsi Front Psychol Psychology Syntactic satiation is the phenomenon where some sentences that initially seem ungrammatical appear more acceptable after repeated exposures (Snyder, 2000). We investigated satiation by manipulating two factors known to affect syntactic priming, a phenomenon where recent exposure to a grammatical structure facilitates subsequent processing of that structure (Bock, 1986). Specifically, we manipulated (i) Proximity of exposure (number of sentences between primes and targets) and (ii) Lexical repetition (type of phrase repeated across primes and targets). Experiment 1 investigated whether acceptability ratings of Complex-NP Constraint (CNPC) and Subject islands improve as consequence of these variables. If so, priming and satiation may be linked. When primes were separated from targets by one sentence, CNPC islands’ acceptability was improved by a preceding island of the same type, but Subject islands’ acceptability was not. When prime-target pairs were separated by five sentences, we found no improvement for either island type. Experiment 2 asked whether improvements in Experiment 1 reflected online processing or offline end-of-sentence effects. We used a self-paced reading paradigm to diagnose online structure-building and processing facilitation (Ivanova et al., 2012a) during processing. We found priming for Subject islands when primes and targets were close together, but not when they were further apart. No effects were detected when CNPC islands were close together, but there was a localized effect when sentences were further apart. The disjunction between Experiments 1 and 2 suggests repetition of the structure in Subject islands facilitated online processing but did not ‘spill over’ to acceptability ratings. Meanwhile, results for CNPC islands suggest that acceptability rating improvements in Experiment 1 may be driven by factors distinct from online processing facilitation. Together, our experiments show that satiation may not be a one-size-fit-all phenomenon but, instead, appears to manifest itself differently for different types of structures. Priming is possible and may be linked to satiation in some purportedly “unbuildable” structures (e.g., Subject islands), but not for all types (e.g., CNPC islands). Despite this, it appears that while the types of mechanisms targeting different island types are distinct, they are nevertheless similarly sensitive to the proximity between individual exposures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5661427/ /pubmed/29118726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01851 Text en Copyright © 2017 Do and Kaiser. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Do, Monica L.
Kaiser, Elsi
The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title_full The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title_fullStr The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title_short The Relationship between Syntactic Satiation and Syntactic Priming: A First Look
title_sort relationship between syntactic satiation and syntactic priming: a first look
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01851
work_keys_str_mv AT domonical therelationshipbetweensyntacticsatiationandsyntacticprimingafirstlook
AT kaiserelsi therelationshipbetweensyntacticsatiationandsyntacticprimingafirstlook
AT domonical relationshipbetweensyntacticsatiationandsyntacticprimingafirstlook
AT kaiserelsi relationshipbetweensyntacticsatiationandsyntacticprimingafirstlook