Cargando…

Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad

The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for combination therapy to achieve serum urate (SUA) target levels in gout. Within this overarching aim, a second aim was to evaluate the evidence for a new uricosuric agent lesinurad, which inhibits urate transport in the kidney. In summary, this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Graeme, Panova, Elena, Day, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S97959
_version_ 1783274488279859200
author Jones, Graeme
Panova, Elena
Day, Richard
author_facet Jones, Graeme
Panova, Elena
Day, Richard
author_sort Jones, Graeme
collection PubMed
description The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for combination therapy to achieve serum urate (SUA) target levels in gout. Within this overarching aim, a second aim was to evaluate the evidence for a new uricosuric agent lesinurad, which inhibits urate transport in the kidney. In summary, this review indicates that there are a number of ways to approach patients who do not achieve a target serum urate with allopurinol (APL) monotherapy. These include higher doses of APL up to 600–800 mg/d, switching to febuxostat, or adding in a uricosuric. For the latter option, controlled supporting evidence is available for benzbromarone, probenecid, and lesinurad. All options appear similar in terms of success rates, so the choice of option comes down to physician and patient choice, cost, experience, and strength of the evidence base. Increasing the dose of APL is the cheapest option, while febuxostat is consistently superior to standard doses of APL. The strongest evidence for the uricosuric option is available for lesinurad as trials of other agents are either nonexistent or based on small single-centre trials. It is suggested that guidelines should be expanded to consider all of these evidence-based options in the not-uncommon occurrence of APL inadequate response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56614812017-11-09 Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad Jones, Graeme Panova, Elena Day, Richard Drug Des Devel Ther Review The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for combination therapy to achieve serum urate (SUA) target levels in gout. Within this overarching aim, a second aim was to evaluate the evidence for a new uricosuric agent lesinurad, which inhibits urate transport in the kidney. In summary, this review indicates that there are a number of ways to approach patients who do not achieve a target serum urate with allopurinol (APL) monotherapy. These include higher doses of APL up to 600–800 mg/d, switching to febuxostat, or adding in a uricosuric. For the latter option, controlled supporting evidence is available for benzbromarone, probenecid, and lesinurad. All options appear similar in terms of success rates, so the choice of option comes down to physician and patient choice, cost, experience, and strength of the evidence base. Increasing the dose of APL is the cheapest option, while febuxostat is consistently superior to standard doses of APL. The strongest evidence for the uricosuric option is available for lesinurad as trials of other agents are either nonexistent or based on small single-centre trials. It is suggested that guidelines should be expanded to consider all of these evidence-based options in the not-uncommon occurrence of APL inadequate response. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5661481/ /pubmed/29123379 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S97959 Text en © 2017 Jones et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Jones, Graeme
Panova, Elena
Day, Richard
Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title_full Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title_fullStr Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title_full_unstemmed Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title_short Guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
title_sort guideline development for the management of gout: role of combination therapy with a focus on lesinurad
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123379
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S97959
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesgraeme guidelinedevelopmentforthemanagementofgoutroleofcombinationtherapywithafocusonlesinurad
AT panovaelena guidelinedevelopmentforthemanagementofgoutroleofcombinationtherapywithafocusonlesinurad
AT dayrichard guidelinedevelopmentforthemanagementofgoutroleofcombinationtherapywithafocusonlesinurad