Cargando…
Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cyc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014 |
_version_ | 1783274547716292608 |
---|---|
author | Irahara, Minoru Kuwahara, Akira Iwasa, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomonori Ishihara, Osamu Kugu, Koji Sawa, Rintaro Banno, Kouji Saito, Hidekazu |
author_facet | Irahara, Minoru Kuwahara, Akira Iwasa, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomonori Ishihara, Osamu Kugu, Koji Sawa, Rintaro Banno, Kouji Saito, Hidekazu |
author_sort | Irahara, Minoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cycles, of which 66 550 were pregnancy cycles and 46 008 were cycles with a live birth. Compared to the number of registered treatments in 2008, when the cycle‐based registry was newly introduced, there was a 2.07‐fold increase in the total number of treatments and a 2.25‐fold increase in the number of cycles with a live birth. As the average age of patients who receive assisted reproductive technology has become markedly higher year by year, the most common age of those patients who received assisted reproductive technology in 2014 was 40 years. CONCLUSION: The total numbers of both assisted reproductive technology treatments and assisted reproductive technology live births are likely to be higher in the future. In addition, the trend toward aging patients seems to be continuing into the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5661813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56618132017-12-19 Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Irahara, Minoru Kuwahara, Akira Iwasa, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomonori Ishihara, Osamu Kugu, Koji Sawa, Rintaro Banno, Kouji Saito, Hidekazu Reprod Med Biol Original Articles AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cycles, of which 66 550 were pregnancy cycles and 46 008 were cycles with a live birth. Compared to the number of registered treatments in 2008, when the cycle‐based registry was newly introduced, there was a 2.07‐fold increase in the total number of treatments and a 2.25‐fold increase in the number of cycles with a live birth. As the average age of patients who receive assisted reproductive technology has become markedly higher year by year, the most common age of those patients who received assisted reproductive technology in 2014 was 40 years. CONCLUSION: The total numbers of both assisted reproductive technology treatments and assisted reproductive technology live births are likely to be higher in the future. In addition, the trend toward aging patients seems to be continuing into the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5661813/ /pubmed/29259459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Irahara, Minoru Kuwahara, Akira Iwasa, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomonori Ishihara, Osamu Kugu, Koji Sawa, Rintaro Banno, Kouji Saito, Hidekazu Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title | Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_full | Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_fullStr | Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_full_unstemmed | Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_short | Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_sort | assisted reproductive technology in japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the ethics committee, japan society of obstetrics and gynecology |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iraharaminoru assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT kuwaharaakira assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT iwasatakeshi assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT ishikawatomonori assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT ishiharaosamu assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT kugukoji assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT sawarintaro assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT bannokouji assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology AT saitohidekazu assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology |