Cargando…

Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irahara, Minoru, Kuwahara, Akira, Iwasa, Takeshi, Ishikawa, Tomonori, Ishihara, Osamu, Kugu, Koji, Sawa, Rintaro, Banno, Kouji, Saito, Hidekazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014
_version_ 1783274547716292608
author Irahara, Minoru
Kuwahara, Akira
Iwasa, Takeshi
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Ishihara, Osamu
Kugu, Koji
Sawa, Rintaro
Banno, Kouji
Saito, Hidekazu
author_facet Irahara, Minoru
Kuwahara, Akira
Iwasa, Takeshi
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Ishihara, Osamu
Kugu, Koji
Sawa, Rintaro
Banno, Kouji
Saito, Hidekazu
author_sort Irahara, Minoru
collection PubMed
description AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cycles, of which 66 550 were pregnancy cycles and 46 008 were cycles with a live birth. Compared to the number of registered treatments in 2008, when the cycle‐based registry was newly introduced, there was a 2.07‐fold increase in the total number of treatments and a 2.25‐fold increase in the number of cycles with a live birth. As the average age of patients who receive assisted reproductive technology has become markedly higher year by year, the most common age of those patients who received assisted reproductive technology in 2014 was 40 years. CONCLUSION: The total numbers of both assisted reproductive technology treatments and assisted reproductive technology live births are likely to be higher in the future. In addition, the trend toward aging patients seems to be continuing into the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56618132017-12-19 Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Irahara, Minoru Kuwahara, Akira Iwasa, Takeshi Ishikawa, Tomonori Ishihara, Osamu Kugu, Koji Sawa, Rintaro Banno, Kouji Saito, Hidekazu Reprod Med Biol Original Articles AIM: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology implemented a registry report system for the clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology in 1986. The aggregated results from 1992 to 2014 are reported herein. METHODS AND RESULTS: The total number of registered treatments was 393 745 cycles, of which 66 550 were pregnancy cycles and 46 008 were cycles with a live birth. Compared to the number of registered treatments in 2008, when the cycle‐based registry was newly introduced, there was a 2.07‐fold increase in the total number of treatments and a 2.25‐fold increase in the number of cycles with a live birth. As the average age of patients who receive assisted reproductive technology has become markedly higher year by year, the most common age of those patients who received assisted reproductive technology in 2014 was 40 years. CONCLUSION: The total numbers of both assisted reproductive technology treatments and assisted reproductive technology live births are likely to be higher in the future. In addition, the trend toward aging patients seems to be continuing into the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5661813/ /pubmed/29259459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Irahara, Minoru
Kuwahara, Akira
Iwasa, Takeshi
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Ishihara, Osamu
Kugu, Koji
Sawa, Rintaro
Banno, Kouji
Saito, Hidekazu
Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_full Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_fullStr Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_full_unstemmed Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_short Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the Ethics Committee, Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_sort assisted reproductive technology in japan: a summary report of 1992–2014 by the ethics committee, japan society of obstetrics and gynecology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12014
work_keys_str_mv AT iraharaminoru assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT kuwaharaakira assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT iwasatakeshi assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT ishikawatomonori assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT ishiharaosamu assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT kugukoji assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT sawarintaro assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT bannokouji assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology
AT saitohidekazu assistedreproductivetechnologyinjapanasummaryreportof19922014bytheethicscommitteejapansocietyofobstetricsandgynecology