Cargando…

Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation

PURPOSE: To explore the optimal lenticule storage conditions that maintain lenticule integrity and clarity. METHODS: A total of 99 lenticules obtained from myopic patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were divided into four combinations for short-term storage conditions: PB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yu-Chi, Williams, Geraint P., George, Ben L., Soh, Yu Qiang, Seah, Xin Yi, Peh, Gary Swee Lim, Yam, Gary Hin Fai, Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Vision 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123364
_version_ 1783274557632675840
author Liu, Yu-Chi
Williams, Geraint P.
George, Ben L.
Soh, Yu Qiang
Seah, Xin Yi
Peh, Gary Swee Lim
Yam, Gary Hin Fai
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_facet Liu, Yu-Chi
Williams, Geraint P.
George, Ben L.
Soh, Yu Qiang
Seah, Xin Yi
Peh, Gary Swee Lim
Yam, Gary Hin Fai
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_sort Liu, Yu-Chi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the optimal lenticule storage conditions that maintain lenticule integrity and clarity. METHODS: A total of 99 lenticules obtained from myopic patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were divided into four combinations for short-term storage conditions: PBS, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Optisol GS, or anhydrous glycerol. Two thirds of the lenticules were further stored for 4 weeks under eight different conditions. Clarity evaluation with transmittance measurements, cell-death assays with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay (TUNEL), collagen fibril spacing and necrotic response assessed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and immunohistochemistry analysis for human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and CD45 for immunogenicity, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 for keratocyte response, were undertaken at baseline, 48 h (short term), and 4 weeks (long term). RESULTS: The TUNEL and immunogenicity results were comparable among the groups. The mean percentage of TUNEL-positive cells across all groups was 24.3% ± 11.8% and 62.9% ± 20.7% at the 48 h and 4 week time points, respectively. HLA-ABC+, HLA-DR+, and CD45+ cells were extremely rare, and MMP-2 expression ranged from non-detectable to minimal, under all conditions at all time points. Transmittance at 4 weeks was significantly different among groups with the greatest maintenance of clarity seen in the lenticules stored initially in DMEM at 4 °C for 48 h followed by cryopreservation in serum-free medium or glycerol at 4 °C followed by storage at room temperature. At TEM analysis at 4 weeks, the lenticules cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, regardless of storage solutions, had significantly narrower inter-fibrillar distance than controls, while glycerol-preserved lenticules, at either room temperature or −80 °C, maintained the inter-fibrillar distance. CONCLUSIONS: Clarity, structural integrity, and low immunogenicity under various conditions, at 4 °C or room temperature for short-term storage, offer encouragement for lenticule storage. It can be undertaken without access to s specialized and potentially expensive laboratory setup at least within the first 48 h before transportation to larger facilities for long-term storage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5661854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Molecular Vision
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56618542017-11-09 Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation Liu, Yu-Chi Williams, Geraint P. George, Ben L. Soh, Yu Qiang Seah, Xin Yi Peh, Gary Swee Lim Yam, Gary Hin Fai Mehta, Jodhbir S. Mol Vis Research Article PURPOSE: To explore the optimal lenticule storage conditions that maintain lenticule integrity and clarity. METHODS: A total of 99 lenticules obtained from myopic patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) were divided into four combinations for short-term storage conditions: PBS, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Optisol GS, or anhydrous glycerol. Two thirds of the lenticules were further stored for 4 weeks under eight different conditions. Clarity evaluation with transmittance measurements, cell-death assays with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay (TUNEL), collagen fibril spacing and necrotic response assessed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and immunohistochemistry analysis for human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and CD45 for immunogenicity, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 for keratocyte response, were undertaken at baseline, 48 h (short term), and 4 weeks (long term). RESULTS: The TUNEL and immunogenicity results were comparable among the groups. The mean percentage of TUNEL-positive cells across all groups was 24.3% ± 11.8% and 62.9% ± 20.7% at the 48 h and 4 week time points, respectively. HLA-ABC+, HLA-DR+, and CD45+ cells were extremely rare, and MMP-2 expression ranged from non-detectable to minimal, under all conditions at all time points. Transmittance at 4 weeks was significantly different among groups with the greatest maintenance of clarity seen in the lenticules stored initially in DMEM at 4 °C for 48 h followed by cryopreservation in serum-free medium or glycerol at 4 °C followed by storage at room temperature. At TEM analysis at 4 weeks, the lenticules cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, regardless of storage solutions, had significantly narrower inter-fibrillar distance than controls, while glycerol-preserved lenticules, at either room temperature or −80 °C, maintained the inter-fibrillar distance. CONCLUSIONS: Clarity, structural integrity, and low immunogenicity under various conditions, at 4 °C or room temperature for short-term storage, offer encouragement for lenticule storage. It can be undertaken without access to s specialized and potentially expensive laboratory setup at least within the first 48 h before transportation to larger facilities for long-term storage. Molecular Vision 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5661854/ /pubmed/29123364 Text en Copyright © 2017 Molecular Vision. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, used for non-commercial purposes, and is not altered or transformed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Yu-Chi
Williams, Geraint P.
George, Ben L.
Soh, Yu Qiang
Seah, Xin Yi
Peh, Gary Swee Lim
Yam, Gary Hin Fai
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title_full Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title_fullStr Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title_full_unstemmed Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title_short Corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
title_sort corneal lenticule storage before reimplantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123364
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyuchi corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT williamsgeraintp corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT georgebenl corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT sohyuqiang corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT seahxinyi corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT pehgarysweelim corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT yamgaryhinfai corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation
AT mehtajodhbirs corneallenticulestoragebeforereimplantation