Cargando…
Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CMRA) is the established imaging modality for patients with Marfan syndrome requiring life-long annual aortic imaging before and after aortic root replacement. Contrast-free CMRA techniques avoiding side-effects of contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0394-y |
_version_ | 1783274566982828032 |
---|---|
author | Veldhoen, Simon Behzadi, Cyrus Lenz, Alexander Henes, Frank Oliver Rybczynski, Meike von Kodolitsch, Yskert Bley, Thorsten Alexander Adam, Gerhard Bannas, Peter |
author_facet | Veldhoen, Simon Behzadi, Cyrus Lenz, Alexander Henes, Frank Oliver Rybczynski, Meike von Kodolitsch, Yskert Bley, Thorsten Alexander Adam, Gerhard Bannas, Peter |
author_sort | Veldhoen, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CMRA) is the established imaging modality for patients with Marfan syndrome requiring life-long annual aortic imaging before and after aortic root replacement. Contrast-free CMRA techniques avoiding side-effects of contrast media are highly desirable for serial imaging but have not been evaluated in the postoperative setup of Marfan patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of non-contrast balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) magnetic resonance imaging for aortic monitoring of postoperative patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: Sixty-four adult Marfan patients after aortic root replacement were prospectively included. Fourteen patients (22%) had a residual aortic dissection after surgical treatment of type A dissection. bSSFP imaging and CE-CMRA were performed at 1.5 Tesla. Two radiologists evaluated the images regarding image quality (1 = poor, 4 = excellent), artifacts (1 = severe, 4 = none) and aortic pathologies. Readers measured the aortic diameters at defined levels in both techniques. Statistics included observer agreement for image scoring and diameter measurements and ROC analyses for comparison of the diagnostic performance of bSSFP and CE-CMRA. RESULTS: Both readers observed no significant differences in image quality between bSSFP and CE-CMRA and found a median image quality score of 4 for both techniques (all p > .05). No significant differences were found regarding the frequency of image artifacts in both sequences (all p > .05). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of aortic dissections was 100% for both readers and techniques. Compared to bSSFP imaging, CE-CMRA resulted in higher diameters (mean bias, 0.9 mm; p < .05). The inter-observer biases of diameter measurements were not significantly different (all p > .05), except for the distal graft anastomosis (p = .001). Using both techniques, the readers correctly identified a graft suture dehiscence with aneurysm formation requiring surgery. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced bSSFP CMR imaging allows for riskless aortic monitoring with high diagnostic accuracy in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5661928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56619282017-11-01 Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery Veldhoen, Simon Behzadi, Cyrus Lenz, Alexander Henes, Frank Oliver Rybczynski, Meike von Kodolitsch, Yskert Bley, Thorsten Alexander Adam, Gerhard Bannas, Peter J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CMRA) is the established imaging modality for patients with Marfan syndrome requiring life-long annual aortic imaging before and after aortic root replacement. Contrast-free CMRA techniques avoiding side-effects of contrast media are highly desirable for serial imaging but have not been evaluated in the postoperative setup of Marfan patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of non-contrast balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) magnetic resonance imaging for aortic monitoring of postoperative patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: Sixty-four adult Marfan patients after aortic root replacement were prospectively included. Fourteen patients (22%) had a residual aortic dissection after surgical treatment of type A dissection. bSSFP imaging and CE-CMRA were performed at 1.5 Tesla. Two radiologists evaluated the images regarding image quality (1 = poor, 4 = excellent), artifacts (1 = severe, 4 = none) and aortic pathologies. Readers measured the aortic diameters at defined levels in both techniques. Statistics included observer agreement for image scoring and diameter measurements and ROC analyses for comparison of the diagnostic performance of bSSFP and CE-CMRA. RESULTS: Both readers observed no significant differences in image quality between bSSFP and CE-CMRA and found a median image quality score of 4 for both techniques (all p > .05). No significant differences were found regarding the frequency of image artifacts in both sequences (all p > .05). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of aortic dissections was 100% for both readers and techniques. Compared to bSSFP imaging, CE-CMRA resulted in higher diameters (mean bias, 0.9 mm; p < .05). The inter-observer biases of diameter measurements were not significantly different (all p > .05), except for the distal graft anastomosis (p = .001). Using both techniques, the readers correctly identified a graft suture dehiscence with aneurysm formation requiring surgery. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced bSSFP CMR imaging allows for riskless aortic monitoring with high diagnostic accuracy in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery. BioMed Central 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5661928/ /pubmed/29084542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0394-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Veldhoen, Simon Behzadi, Cyrus Lenz, Alexander Henes, Frank Oliver Rybczynski, Meike von Kodolitsch, Yskert Bley, Thorsten Alexander Adam, Gerhard Bannas, Peter Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title | Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title_full | Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title_fullStr | Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title_short | Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
title_sort | non-contrast mr angiography at 1.5 tesla for aortic monitoring in marfan patients after aortic root surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5661928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0394-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veldhoensimon noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT behzadicyrus noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT lenzalexander noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT henesfrankoliver noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT rybczynskimeike noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT vonkodolitschyskert noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT bleythorstenalexander noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT adamgerhard noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery AT bannaspeter noncontrastmrangiographyat15teslaforaorticmonitoringinmarfanpatientsafteraorticrootsurgery |