Cargando…

EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The EZSCAN is a non-invasive device that, by evaluating sweat gland function, may detect subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies assessing the performance of the EZSCAN for detecting cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio, Ruiz-Alejos, Andrea, Miranda, J. Jaime, Mathur, Rohini, Perel, Pablo, Smeeth, Liam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187297
_version_ 1783274590347198464
author Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Ruiz-Alejos, Andrea
Miranda, J. Jaime
Mathur, Rohini
Perel, Pablo
Smeeth, Liam
author_facet Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Ruiz-Alejos, Andrea
Miranda, J. Jaime
Mathur, Rohini
Perel, Pablo
Smeeth, Liam
author_sort Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The EZSCAN is a non-invasive device that, by evaluating sweat gland function, may detect subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies assessing the performance of the EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We searched for observational studies including diagnostic accuracy and performance results assessing EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM. OVID (Medline, Embase, Global Health), CINAHL and SCOPUS databases, plus secondary resources, were searched until March 29, 2017. The following keywords were utilized for the systematic searching: type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, EZSCAN, SUDOSCAN, and sudomotor function. Two investigators extracted the information for meta-analysis and assessed the quality of the data using the Revised Version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. Pooled estimates were obtained by fitting the logistic-normal random-effects model without covariates but random intercepts and using the Freeman-Tukey Arcsine Transformation to stabilize variances. Heterogeneity was also assessed using the I(2) measure. Four studies (n = 7,720) were included, three of them used oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard. Using Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic model, summary sensitivity was 72.0% (95%CI: 60.0%– 83.0%), whereas specificity was 56.0% (95%CI: 38.0%– 74.0%). Studies were very heterogeneous (I(2) for sensitivity: 79.2% and for specificity: 99.1%) regarding the inclusion criteria and bias was present mainly due to participants selection. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM seems to be acceptable, but evidence of high heterogeneity and participant selection bias was detected in most of the studies included. More studies are needed to evaluate the performance of the EZSCAN for undiagnosed T2DM screening, especially at the population level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56622142017-11-09 EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio Ruiz-Alejos, Andrea Miranda, J. Jaime Mathur, Rohini Perel, Pablo Smeeth, Liam PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The EZSCAN is a non-invasive device that, by evaluating sweat gland function, may detect subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies assessing the performance of the EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We searched for observational studies including diagnostic accuracy and performance results assessing EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM. OVID (Medline, Embase, Global Health), CINAHL and SCOPUS databases, plus secondary resources, were searched until March 29, 2017. The following keywords were utilized for the systematic searching: type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, EZSCAN, SUDOSCAN, and sudomotor function. Two investigators extracted the information for meta-analysis and assessed the quality of the data using the Revised Version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. Pooled estimates were obtained by fitting the logistic-normal random-effects model without covariates but random intercepts and using the Freeman-Tukey Arcsine Transformation to stabilize variances. Heterogeneity was also assessed using the I(2) measure. Four studies (n = 7,720) were included, three of them used oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard. Using Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic model, summary sensitivity was 72.0% (95%CI: 60.0%– 83.0%), whereas specificity was 56.0% (95%CI: 38.0%– 74.0%). Studies were very heterogeneous (I(2) for sensitivity: 79.2% and for specificity: 99.1%) regarding the inclusion criteria and bias was present mainly due to participants selection. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of EZSCAN for detecting cases of undiagnosed T2DM seems to be acceptable, but evidence of high heterogeneity and participant selection bias was detected in most of the studies included. More studies are needed to evaluate the performance of the EZSCAN for undiagnosed T2DM screening, especially at the population level. Public Library of Science 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5662214/ /pubmed/29084286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187297 Text en © 2017 Bernabe-Ortiz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
Ruiz-Alejos, Andrea
Miranda, J. Jaime
Mathur, Rohini
Perel, Pablo
Smeeth, Liam
EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ezscan for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187297
work_keys_str_mv AT bernabeortizantonio ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruizalejosandrea ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mirandajjaime ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mathurrohini ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perelpablo ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smeethliam ezscanforundiagnosedtype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis