Cargando…

A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women

OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse, Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas, de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia, Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite, de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro, de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros, de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros, Micussi, Maria Thereza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045
_version_ 1783274594025603072
author Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse
Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas
de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia
Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite
de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro
de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros
de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros
Micussi, Maria Thereza
author_facet Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse
Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas
de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia
Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite
de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro
de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros
de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros
Micussi, Maria Thereza
author_sort Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classified according to the modified Oxford scale. A simple linear regression was performed to determine the classification scale of manometry using the modified Oxford scale as the explanatory variable and the arithmetic mean of the manometry measurements as the response variable. RESULTS: The average age was 52.80 (±8.78; CI: 51.67–53.93) years. Manometry showed an average of 35.1 (±22.7; CI: 32.1–38.0) cmH(2)O and most women (29.7%) scored grade 3 on the modified Oxford scale. According to the proposed scale, values between 7.5 to 14.5 cmH(2)O correspond to very weak pressure; 14.6 to 26.5 cmH(2)O represent weak pressure; 26.6 to 41.5 cmH(2)O represent moderate pressure; 41.6 to 60.5 cmH(2)O represent good pressure, and values above 60.6 cmH(2)O correspond to strong pressure. CONCLUSION: Manometry values were rated on a five-point scale. It is possible to rank the pressure levels performed by voluntary contraction of PFM with this new scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56622292017-11-09 A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros Micussi, Maria Thereza PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classified according to the modified Oxford scale. A simple linear regression was performed to determine the classification scale of manometry using the modified Oxford scale as the explanatory variable and the arithmetic mean of the manometry measurements as the response variable. RESULTS: The average age was 52.80 (±8.78; CI: 51.67–53.93) years. Manometry showed an average of 35.1 (±22.7; CI: 32.1–38.0) cmH(2)O and most women (29.7%) scored grade 3 on the modified Oxford scale. According to the proposed scale, values between 7.5 to 14.5 cmH(2)O correspond to very weak pressure; 14.6 to 26.5 cmH(2)O represent weak pressure; 26.6 to 41.5 cmH(2)O represent moderate pressure; 41.6 to 60.5 cmH(2)O represent good pressure, and values above 60.6 cmH(2)O correspond to strong pressure. CONCLUSION: Manometry values were rated on a five-point scale. It is possible to rank the pressure levels performed by voluntary contraction of PFM with this new scale. Public Library of Science 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5662229/ /pubmed/29084229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045 Text en © 2017 Angelo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse
Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas
de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia
Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite
de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro
de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros
de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros
Micussi, Maria Thereza
A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title_full A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title_fullStr A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title_full_unstemmed A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title_short A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
title_sort manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045
work_keys_str_mv AT angelopriscyllahelouyse amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT varellalarissaramalhodantas amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deoliveiramariaclaraeugenia amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT matiasmonayanegraziellyleite amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deazevedomariaaneilmaribeiro amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT dealmeidaluzinetemedeiros amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deazevedopaulorobertomedeiros amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT micussimariathereza amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT angelopriscyllahelouyse manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT varellalarissaramalhodantas manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deoliveiramariaclaraeugenia manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT matiasmonayanegraziellyleite manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deazevedomariaaneilmaribeiro manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT dealmeidaluzinetemedeiros manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT deazevedopaulorobertomedeiros manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen
AT micussimariathereza manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen