Cargando…
A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women
OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classifie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045 |
_version_ | 1783274594025603072 |
---|---|
author | Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros Micussi, Maria Thereza |
author_facet | Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros Micussi, Maria Thereza |
author_sort | Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classified according to the modified Oxford scale. A simple linear regression was performed to determine the classification scale of manometry using the modified Oxford scale as the explanatory variable and the arithmetic mean of the manometry measurements as the response variable. RESULTS: The average age was 52.80 (±8.78; CI: 51.67–53.93) years. Manometry showed an average of 35.1 (±22.7; CI: 32.1–38.0) cmH(2)O and most women (29.7%) scored grade 3 on the modified Oxford scale. According to the proposed scale, values between 7.5 to 14.5 cmH(2)O correspond to very weak pressure; 14.6 to 26.5 cmH(2)O represent weak pressure; 26.6 to 41.5 cmH(2)O represent moderate pressure; 41.6 to 60.5 cmH(2)O represent good pressure, and values above 60.6 cmH(2)O correspond to strong pressure. CONCLUSION: Manometry values were rated on a five-point scale. It is possible to rank the pressure levels performed by voluntary contraction of PFM with this new scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5662229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56622292017-11-09 A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros Micussi, Maria Thereza PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in Brazilian women, according to the modified Oxford scale. METHODS: A cross sectional study, with 288 women enrolled in the Maternity, Natal, Brazil. Manometry and PFM strength data were collected and classified according to the modified Oxford scale. A simple linear regression was performed to determine the classification scale of manometry using the modified Oxford scale as the explanatory variable and the arithmetic mean of the manometry measurements as the response variable. RESULTS: The average age was 52.80 (±8.78; CI: 51.67–53.93) years. Manometry showed an average of 35.1 (±22.7; CI: 32.1–38.0) cmH(2)O and most women (29.7%) scored grade 3 on the modified Oxford scale. According to the proposed scale, values between 7.5 to 14.5 cmH(2)O correspond to very weak pressure; 14.6 to 26.5 cmH(2)O represent weak pressure; 26.6 to 41.5 cmH(2)O represent moderate pressure; 41.6 to 60.5 cmH(2)O represent good pressure, and values above 60.6 cmH(2)O correspond to strong pressure. CONCLUSION: Manometry values were rated on a five-point scale. It is possible to rank the pressure levels performed by voluntary contraction of PFM with this new scale. Public Library of Science 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5662229/ /pubmed/29084229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045 Text en © 2017 Angelo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Angelo, Priscylla Helouyse Varella, Larissa Ramalho Dantas de Oliveira, Maria Clara Eugênia Matias, Monayane Grazielly Leite de Azevedo, Maria Aneilma Ribeiro de Almeida, Luzinete Medeiros de Azevedo, Paulo Roberto Medeiros Micussi, Maria Thereza A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title | A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title_full | A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title_fullStr | A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title_full_unstemmed | A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title_short | A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
title_sort | manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angelopriscyllahelouyse amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT varellalarissaramalhodantas amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deoliveiramariaclaraeugenia amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT matiasmonayanegraziellyleite amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deazevedomariaaneilmaribeiro amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT dealmeidaluzinetemedeiros amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deazevedopaulorobertomedeiros amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT micussimariathereza amanometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT angelopriscyllahelouyse manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT varellalarissaramalhodantas manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deoliveiramariaclaraeugenia manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT matiasmonayanegraziellyleite manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deazevedomariaaneilmaribeiro manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT dealmeidaluzinetemedeiros manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT deazevedopaulorobertomedeiros manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen AT micussimariathereza manometryclassificationtoassesspelvicfloormusclefunctioninwomen |