Cargando…

Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND: In total hip replacement (THR), it is essential to achieve a primary stability to guarantee good long-term results. A novel locking screw hip (LSH)-stem, anchored to the medial cortex of the proximal femur by 5 monocortical locking screws, was developed to overcome the shortcomings of un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Paul, Gueorguiev, Boyko, Zderic, Ivan, Pfeifer, Christian, Nerlich, Michael, Grechenig, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008278
_version_ 1783274633915531264
author Schmitz, Paul
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Zderic, Ivan
Pfeifer, Christian
Nerlich, Michael
Grechenig, Stephan
author_facet Schmitz, Paul
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Zderic, Ivan
Pfeifer, Christian
Nerlich, Michael
Grechenig, Stephan
author_sort Schmitz, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In total hip replacement (THR), it is essential to achieve a primary stability to guarantee good long-term results. A novel locking screw hip (LSH)-stem, anchored to the medial cortex of the proximal femur by 5 monocortical locking screws, was developed to overcome the shortcomings of uncemented press-fit and cemented straight stems while simultaneously achieving primary stability. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the LSH-stem in comparison to an uncemented press-fit stem. METHODS: Six pairs of embalmed human cadaveric femora from donors aged 68 to 84 years were assigned to 2 study groups (n = 6) with equal number of right and left bones. The specimens in each group and pair were implanted with either an uncemented press-fit stem or an LSH-stem and tested biomechanically under progressively increasing cyclic axial loading until catastrophic failure. Axial construct stiffness, failure load, and cycles to failure were detected and statistically evaluated at a level of significance P = .05. RESULTS: Although the axial stiffness was comparable for both prosthesis types, the uncemented press-fit stem showed a significant lower stability in terms of failure load and cycles to failure in comparison to the LSH-stem, P = .04. CONCLUSION: Converting our results to percentage of bodyweight (BW) in an assumed adult patient of 80 kg shows that the LSH-stem achieves a primary stability allowing to carry average loads of up to 507% BW, whereas the uncemented press-fit stem carried average loads of up to 404% BW. We conclude that both stems achieve a primary stability strong enough to carry hip joint loads experienced in the immediate rehabilitation period after THR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56623902017-11-21 Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation Schmitz, Paul Gueorguiev, Boyko Zderic, Ivan Pfeifer, Christian Nerlich, Michael Grechenig, Stephan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: In total hip replacement (THR), it is essential to achieve a primary stability to guarantee good long-term results. A novel locking screw hip (LSH)-stem, anchored to the medial cortex of the proximal femur by 5 monocortical locking screws, was developed to overcome the shortcomings of uncemented press-fit and cemented straight stems while simultaneously achieving primary stability. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the LSH-stem in comparison to an uncemented press-fit stem. METHODS: Six pairs of embalmed human cadaveric femora from donors aged 68 to 84 years were assigned to 2 study groups (n = 6) with equal number of right and left bones. The specimens in each group and pair were implanted with either an uncemented press-fit stem or an LSH-stem and tested biomechanically under progressively increasing cyclic axial loading until catastrophic failure. Axial construct stiffness, failure load, and cycles to failure were detected and statistically evaluated at a level of significance P = .05. RESULTS: Although the axial stiffness was comparable for both prosthesis types, the uncemented press-fit stem showed a significant lower stability in terms of failure load and cycles to failure in comparison to the LSH-stem, P = .04. CONCLUSION: Converting our results to percentage of bodyweight (BW) in an assumed adult patient of 80 kg shows that the LSH-stem achieves a primary stability allowing to carry average loads of up to 507% BW, whereas the uncemented press-fit stem carried average loads of up to 404% BW. We conclude that both stems achieve a primary stability strong enough to carry hip joint loads experienced in the immediate rehabilitation period after THR. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5662390/ /pubmed/29049224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008278 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Schmitz, Paul
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Zderic, Ivan
Pfeifer, Christian
Nerlich, Michael
Grechenig, Stephan
Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title_full Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title_fullStr Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title_full_unstemmed Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title_short Primary stability in total hip replacement: A biomechanical investigation
title_sort primary stability in total hip replacement: a biomechanical investigation
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008278
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzpaul primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation
AT gueorguievboyko primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation
AT zdericivan primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation
AT pfeiferchristian primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation
AT nerlichmichael primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation
AT grechenigstephan primarystabilityintotalhipreplacementabiomechanicalinvestigation