Cargando…
Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726 |
_version_ | 1783274720081215488 |
---|---|
author | Kazdal, Hizir Kanat, Ayhan Batcik, Osman Ersagun Ozdemir, Bulent Senturk, Senol Yildirim, Murat Kazancioglu, Leyla Sen, Ahmet Batcik, Sule Balik, Mehmet Sabri |
author_facet | Kazdal, Hizir Kanat, Ayhan Batcik, Osman Ersagun Ozdemir, Bulent Senturk, Senol Yildirim, Murat Kazancioglu, Leyla Sen, Ahmet Batcik, Sule Balik, Mehmet Sabri |
author_sort | Kazdal, Hizir |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, this type of LBP is poorly understood, and there is poor consensus regarding increased risk after spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We examined two groups of patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Group I included patients who presented to a neurosurgical clinic complaining of LBP for at least 6 months. Group II was a control group with patients without LBP. We analyzed clinical and sagittal angle parameters, including age, body mass index, parity, central sagittal angle of the sacrum (CSAS), and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated in this study: 23 (43.1%) in Group I and 30 (56.9%) in Group II. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-tests showed that age, parity, and CSAS significantly differed between the two groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Age, parity, and CSAS appear to be associated with increased risk for LBP after CS under spinal anesthesia. Future prospective studies on this subject may help validate our results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5662855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56628552017-11-01 Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section Kazdal, Hizir Kanat, Ayhan Batcik, Osman Ersagun Ozdemir, Bulent Senturk, Senol Yildirim, Murat Kazancioglu, Leyla Sen, Ahmet Batcik, Sule Balik, Mehmet Sabri Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, this type of LBP is poorly understood, and there is poor consensus regarding increased risk after spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We examined two groups of patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Group I included patients who presented to a neurosurgical clinic complaining of LBP for at least 6 months. Group II was a control group with patients without LBP. We analyzed clinical and sagittal angle parameters, including age, body mass index, parity, central sagittal angle of the sacrum (CSAS), and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated in this study: 23 (43.1%) in Group I and 30 (56.9%) in Group II. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-tests showed that age, parity, and CSAS significantly differed between the two groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Age, parity, and CSAS appear to be associated with increased risk for LBP after CS under spinal anesthesia. Future prospective studies on this subject may help validate our results. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-10 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5662855/ /pubmed/29093782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kazdal, Hizir Kanat, Ayhan Batcik, Osman Ersagun Ozdemir, Bulent Senturk, Senol Yildirim, Murat Kazancioglu, Leyla Sen, Ahmet Batcik, Sule Balik, Mehmet Sabri Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title | Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title_full | Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title_fullStr | Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title_full_unstemmed | Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title_short | Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section |
title_sort | central sagittal angle of the sacrum as a new risk factor for patients with persistent low back pain after caesarean section |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazdalhizir centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT kanatayhan centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT batcikosmanersagun centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT ozdemirbulent centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT senturksenol centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT yildirimmurat centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT kazanciogluleyla centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT senahmet centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT batciksule centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection AT balikmehmetsabri centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection |