Cargando…

Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazdal, Hizir, Kanat, Ayhan, Batcik, Osman Ersagun, Ozdemir, Bulent, Senturk, Senol, Yildirim, Murat, Kazancioglu, Leyla, Sen, Ahmet, Batcik, Sule, Balik, Mehmet Sabri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726
_version_ 1783274720081215488
author Kazdal, Hizir
Kanat, Ayhan
Batcik, Osman Ersagun
Ozdemir, Bulent
Senturk, Senol
Yildirim, Murat
Kazancioglu, Leyla
Sen, Ahmet
Batcik, Sule
Balik, Mehmet Sabri
author_facet Kazdal, Hizir
Kanat, Ayhan
Batcik, Osman Ersagun
Ozdemir, Bulent
Senturk, Senol
Yildirim, Murat
Kazancioglu, Leyla
Sen, Ahmet
Batcik, Sule
Balik, Mehmet Sabri
author_sort Kazdal, Hizir
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, this type of LBP is poorly understood, and there is poor consensus regarding increased risk after spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We examined two groups of patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Group I included patients who presented to a neurosurgical clinic complaining of LBP for at least 6 months. Group II was a control group with patients without LBP. We analyzed clinical and sagittal angle parameters, including age, body mass index, parity, central sagittal angle of the sacrum (CSAS), and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated in this study: 23 (43.1%) in Group I and 30 (56.9%) in Group II. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-tests showed that age, parity, and CSAS significantly differed between the two groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Age, parity, and CSAS appear to be associated with increased risk for LBP after CS under spinal anesthesia. Future prospective studies on this subject may help validate our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56628552017-11-01 Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section Kazdal, Hizir Kanat, Ayhan Batcik, Osman Ersagun Ozdemir, Bulent Senturk, Senol Yildirim, Murat Kazancioglu, Leyla Sen, Ahmet Batcik, Sule Balik, Mehmet Sabri Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study investigated the possible association of persistent low back pain (LBP) with caesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Many women suffer from LBP after CS, which is commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. However, this type of LBP is poorly understood, and there is poor consensus regarding increased risk after spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We examined two groups of patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Group I included patients who presented to a neurosurgical clinic complaining of LBP for at least 6 months. Group II was a control group with patients without LBP. We analyzed clinical and sagittal angle parameters, including age, body mass index, parity, central sagittal angle of the sacrum (CSAS), and sacral slope (SS). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated in this study: 23 (43.1%) in Group I and 30 (56.9%) in Group II. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-tests showed that age, parity, and CSAS significantly differed between the two groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Age, parity, and CSAS appear to be associated with increased risk for LBP after CS under spinal anesthesia. Future prospective studies on this subject may help validate our results. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-10 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5662855/ /pubmed/29093782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kazdal, Hizir
Kanat, Ayhan
Batcik, Osman Ersagun
Ozdemir, Bulent
Senturk, Senol
Yildirim, Murat
Kazancioglu, Leyla
Sen, Ahmet
Batcik, Sule
Balik, Mehmet Sabri
Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title_full Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title_fullStr Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title_short Central Sagittal Angle of the Sacrum as a New Risk Factor for Patients with Persistent Low Back Pain after Caesarean Section
title_sort central sagittal angle of the sacrum as a new risk factor for patients with persistent low back pain after caesarean section
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.726
work_keys_str_mv AT kazdalhizir centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT kanatayhan centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT batcikosmanersagun centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT ozdemirbulent centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT senturksenol centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT yildirimmurat centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT kazanciogluleyla centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT senahmet centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT batciksule centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection
AT balikmehmetsabri centralsagittalangleofthesacrumasanewriskfactorforpatientswithpersistentlowbackpainaftercaesareansection