Cargando…

A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an importan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hekmatfard, Maryam, Sanjari, Mohammad Ali, Maroufi, Nader, Saeedi, Hassan, Ebrahimi, Esmail, Behtash, Hamid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093785
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748
_version_ 1783274720775372800
author Hekmatfard, Maryam
Sanjari, Mohammad Ali
Maroufi, Nader
Saeedi, Hassan
Ebrahimi, Esmail
Behtash, Hamid
author_facet Hekmatfard, Maryam
Sanjari, Mohammad Ali
Maroufi, Nader
Saeedi, Hassan
Ebrahimi, Esmail
Behtash, Hamid
author_sort Hekmatfard, Maryam
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an important factor in the assessment of the efficacy of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Previous studies have measured lumbar-support wearing time based on subjective assessment, and these evaluations are not easily verifiable and are usually overestimated by subjects. METHODS: Twelve subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain who had been wearing semirigid lumbar supports for 6 weeks were evaluated. Compliance was objectively monitored using temperature sensors integrated into the semirigid lumbar supports. Subjects wore their lumbar supports for 8 hour/day on workdays and 3 hour/day on holidays during the first 3 weeks. During the next 3 weeks, subjects were gradually weaned off the lumbar supports. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale. The Oswestry disability index was used to assess the subjects' disability. Fear-avoidance behavior was evaluated using a fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean compliance rate of the subjects was 78.16%±13.9%. Pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with a higher compliance rate (p=0.001). Disability index and fear-avoidance beliefs (functional outcomes) significantly improved during the second 3-weeks period of the treatment (p<0.001, p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The compliance rate of patients wearing lumbar supports is a determining factor in chronic low back pain management. Wearing semirigid lumbar supports, as advised, was associated with decreased pain intensity, improved disability index scores, and improved fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56628582017-11-01 A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? Hekmatfard, Maryam Sanjari, Mohammad Ali Maroufi, Nader Saeedi, Hassan Ebrahimi, Esmail Behtash, Hamid Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an important factor in the assessment of the efficacy of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Previous studies have measured lumbar-support wearing time based on subjective assessment, and these evaluations are not easily verifiable and are usually overestimated by subjects. METHODS: Twelve subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain who had been wearing semirigid lumbar supports for 6 weeks were evaluated. Compliance was objectively monitored using temperature sensors integrated into the semirigid lumbar supports. Subjects wore their lumbar supports for 8 hour/day on workdays and 3 hour/day on holidays during the first 3 weeks. During the next 3 weeks, subjects were gradually weaned off the lumbar supports. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale. The Oswestry disability index was used to assess the subjects' disability. Fear-avoidance behavior was evaluated using a fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean compliance rate of the subjects was 78.16%±13.9%. Pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with a higher compliance rate (p=0.001). Disability index and fear-avoidance beliefs (functional outcomes) significantly improved during the second 3-weeks period of the treatment (p<0.001, p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The compliance rate of patients wearing lumbar supports is a determining factor in chronic low back pain management. Wearing semirigid lumbar supports, as advised, was associated with decreased pain intensity, improved disability index scores, and improved fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-10 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5662858/ /pubmed/29093785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hekmatfard, Maryam
Sanjari, Mohammad Ali
Maroufi, Nader
Saeedi, Hassan
Ebrahimi, Esmail
Behtash, Hamid
A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title_full A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title_fullStr A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title_full_unstemmed A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title_short A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
title_sort preliminary study of the objective measurement of compliance rates for semirigid lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: how important is the compliance rate?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093785
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748
work_keys_str_mv AT hekmatfardmaryam apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT sanjarimohammadali apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT maroufinader apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT saeedihassan apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT ebrahimiesmail apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT behtashhamid apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT hekmatfardmaryam preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT sanjarimohammadali preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT maroufinader preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT saeedihassan preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT ebrahimiesmail preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate
AT behtashhamid preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate