Cargando…
A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an importan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748 |
_version_ | 1783274720775372800 |
---|---|
author | Hekmatfard, Maryam Sanjari, Mohammad Ali Maroufi, Nader Saeedi, Hassan Ebrahimi, Esmail Behtash, Hamid |
author_facet | Hekmatfard, Maryam Sanjari, Mohammad Ali Maroufi, Nader Saeedi, Hassan Ebrahimi, Esmail Behtash, Hamid |
author_sort | Hekmatfard, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an important factor in the assessment of the efficacy of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Previous studies have measured lumbar-support wearing time based on subjective assessment, and these evaluations are not easily verifiable and are usually overestimated by subjects. METHODS: Twelve subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain who had been wearing semirigid lumbar supports for 6 weeks were evaluated. Compliance was objectively monitored using temperature sensors integrated into the semirigid lumbar supports. Subjects wore their lumbar supports for 8 hour/day on workdays and 3 hour/day on holidays during the first 3 weeks. During the next 3 weeks, subjects were gradually weaned off the lumbar supports. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale. The Oswestry disability index was used to assess the subjects' disability. Fear-avoidance behavior was evaluated using a fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean compliance rate of the subjects was 78.16%±13.9%. Pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with a higher compliance rate (p=0.001). Disability index and fear-avoidance beliefs (functional outcomes) significantly improved during the second 3-weeks period of the treatment (p<0.001, p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The compliance rate of patients wearing lumbar supports is a determining factor in chronic low back pain management. Wearing semirigid lumbar supports, as advised, was associated with decreased pain intensity, improved disability index scores, and improved fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5662858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56628582017-11-01 A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? Hekmatfard, Maryam Sanjari, Mohammad Ali Maroufi, Nader Saeedi, Hassan Ebrahimi, Esmail Behtash, Hamid Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Clinical pilot study. PURPOSE: To objectively evaluate the compliance rate of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, as well as to assess low back pain intensity, disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Wearing time is an important factor in the assessment of the efficacy of lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Previous studies have measured lumbar-support wearing time based on subjective assessment, and these evaluations are not easily verifiable and are usually overestimated by subjects. METHODS: Twelve subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain who had been wearing semirigid lumbar supports for 6 weeks were evaluated. Compliance was objectively monitored using temperature sensors integrated into the semirigid lumbar supports. Subjects wore their lumbar supports for 8 hour/day on workdays and 3 hour/day on holidays during the first 3 weeks. During the next 3 weeks, subjects were gradually weaned off the lumbar supports. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale. The Oswestry disability index was used to assess the subjects' disability. Fear-avoidance behavior was evaluated using a fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean compliance rate of the subjects was 78.16%±13.9%. Pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with a higher compliance rate (p=0.001). Disability index and fear-avoidance beliefs (functional outcomes) significantly improved during the second 3-weeks period of the treatment (p<0.001, p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The compliance rate of patients wearing lumbar supports is a determining factor in chronic low back pain management. Wearing semirigid lumbar supports, as advised, was associated with decreased pain intensity, improved disability index scores, and improved fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-10 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5662858/ /pubmed/29093785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hekmatfard, Maryam Sanjari, Mohammad Ali Maroufi, Nader Saeedi, Hassan Ebrahimi, Esmail Behtash, Hamid A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title | A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title_full | A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title_fullStr | A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title_short | A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate? |
title_sort | preliminary study of the objective measurement of compliance rates for semirigid lumbar-support use in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: how important is the compliance rate? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.748 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hekmatfardmaryam apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT sanjarimohammadali apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT maroufinader apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT saeedihassan apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT ebrahimiesmail apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT behtashhamid apreliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT hekmatfardmaryam preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT sanjarimohammadali preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT maroufinader preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT saeedihassan preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT ebrahimiesmail preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate AT behtashhamid preliminarystudyoftheobjectivemeasurementofcomplianceratesforsemirigidlumbarsupportuseinpatientswithchronicnonspecificlowbackpainhowimportantisthecompliancerate |