Cargando…

Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. OVERVIEW OF LIT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyakoshi, Naohisa, Kobayashi, Takashi, Suzuki, Tetsuya, Kikuchi, Kazuma, Kasukawa, Yuji, Shimada, Yoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.756
_version_ 1783274721003962368
author Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Kobayashi, Takashi
Suzuki, Tetsuya
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Kasukawa, Yuji
Shimada, Yoichi
author_facet Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Kobayashi, Takashi
Suzuki, Tetsuya
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Kasukawa, Yuji
Shimada, Yoichi
author_sort Miyakoshi, Naohisa
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: With increased aging of society, the demand for instrumentation surgery for an osteoporotic spine has been increasing. However, no studies have compared the rates or severities of perioperative complications after spinal instrumentation surgery between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with OVC aged ≥50 years (23 males and 68 females) who underwent posterior approach vertebral replacement with cages or posterior spinal fusion combined with vertebroplasty were divided into primary (n=56) and secondary (n=35) osteoporosis groups. Bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis treatment prior to OVC, operative invasiveness, and perioperative medical complications were compared. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus (51.4%) was the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis, followed by glucocorticoid use (22.9%). No significant differences were seen in terms of age, gender, BMD, osteoporosis treatment, or operative invasiveness, including the number of levels fused, estimated blood loss, and number of patients requiring transfusion. No significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications were observed between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups (16.1% vs. 22.9%). However, surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly more frequently seen in the secondary osteoporosis group (11.4%) than in the primary osteoporosis group (1.8%; p<0.05). One patient in the secondary osteoporosis group developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection that ultimately required instrument removal. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for OVC was comparable between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups under conditions of similar background characteristics and operative invasiveness. However, SSI (particularly more severe cases) occurred more frequently in patients with secondary osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56628592017-11-01 Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis Miyakoshi, Naohisa Kobayashi, Takashi Suzuki, Tetsuya Kikuchi, Kazuma Kasukawa, Yuji Shimada, Yoichi Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: With increased aging of society, the demand for instrumentation surgery for an osteoporotic spine has been increasing. However, no studies have compared the rates or severities of perioperative complications after spinal instrumentation surgery between patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis. METHODS: Ninety-one patients with OVC aged ≥50 years (23 males and 68 females) who underwent posterior approach vertebral replacement with cages or posterior spinal fusion combined with vertebroplasty were divided into primary (n=56) and secondary (n=35) osteoporosis groups. Bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis treatment prior to OVC, operative invasiveness, and perioperative medical complications were compared. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus (51.4%) was the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis, followed by glucocorticoid use (22.9%). No significant differences were seen in terms of age, gender, BMD, osteoporosis treatment, or operative invasiveness, including the number of levels fused, estimated blood loss, and number of patients requiring transfusion. No significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications were observed between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups (16.1% vs. 22.9%). However, surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly more frequently seen in the secondary osteoporosis group (11.4%) than in the primary osteoporosis group (1.8%; p<0.05). One patient in the secondary osteoporosis group developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection that ultimately required instrument removal. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for OVC was comparable between the primary and secondary osteoporosis groups under conditions of similar background characteristics and operative invasiveness. However, SSI (particularly more severe cases) occurred more frequently in patients with secondary osteoporosis. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2017-10 2017-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5662859/ /pubmed/29093786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.756 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Kobayashi, Takashi
Suzuki, Tetsuya
Kikuchi, Kazuma
Kasukawa, Yuji
Shimada, Yoichi
Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title_full Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title_fullStr Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title_short Perioperative Medical Complications after Posterior Approach Spinal Instrumentation Surgery for Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Comparative Study in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Those with Secondary Osteoporosis
title_sort perioperative medical complications after posterior approach spinal instrumentation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse: a comparative study in patients with primary osteoporosis and those with secondary osteoporosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.756
work_keys_str_mv AT miyakoshinaohisa perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis
AT kobayashitakashi perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis
AT suzukitetsuya perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis
AT kikuchikazuma perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis
AT kasukawayuji perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis
AT shimadayoichi perioperativemedicalcomplicationsafterposteriorapproachspinalinstrumentationsurgeryforosteoporoticvertebralcollapseacomparativestudyinpatientswithprimaryosteoporosisandthosewithsecondaryosteoporosis