Cargando…

A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography

Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontenot, Tatyana E., Giardina, Christopher K., Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592
_version_ 1783274730680221696
author Fontenot, Tatyana E.
Giardina, Christopher K.
Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
author_facet Fontenot, Tatyana E.
Giardina, Christopher K.
Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
author_sort Fontenot, Tatyana E.
collection PubMed
description Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part of the response to low frequency tones. Here, we used a model based on source properties to account for recorded waveform shapes and to separate the combined signal into its components. The model for the cochlear microphonic (CM) was a sinusoid with parameters for independent saturation of the peaks and the troughs of the responses. The model for the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) was the convolution of a unit potential and population cycle histogram with a parameter for spread of excitation. Phases of the ANN and CM were additional parameters. The average cycle from the ongoing response was the input, and adaptive fitting identified CM and ANN parameters that best reproduced the waveform shape. Test datasets were responses recorded from the round windows of CI recipients, from the round window of gerbils before and after application of neurotoxins, and with simulated signals where each parameter could be manipulated in isolation. Waveforms recorded from 284 CI recipients had a variety of morphologies that the model fit with an average r(2) of 0.97 ± 0.058 (standard deviation). With simulated signals, small systematic differences between outputs and inputs were seen with some variable combinations, but in general there were limited interactions among the parameters. In gerbils, the CM reported was relatively unaffected by the neurotoxins. In contrast, the ANN was strongly reduced and the reduction was limited to frequencies of 1,000 Hz and lower, consistent with the range of strong neural phase-locking. Across human CI subjects, the ANN contribution was variable, ranging from nearly none to larger than the CM. Development of this model could provide a means to isolate hair cell and neural activity that are mixed in the ongoing response to low-frequency tones. This tool can help characterize the residual physiology across CI subjects, and can be useful in other clinical settings where a description of the cochlear physiology is desirable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5662900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56629002017-11-09 A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography Fontenot, Tatyana E. Giardina, Christopher K. Fitzpatrick, Douglas C. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Electrocochleography (ECochG) is a potential clinically valuable technique for predicting speech perception outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients, among other uses. Current analysis is limited by an inability to quantify hair cell and neural contributions which are mixed in the ongoing part of the response to low frequency tones. Here, we used a model based on source properties to account for recorded waveform shapes and to separate the combined signal into its components. The model for the cochlear microphonic (CM) was a sinusoid with parameters for independent saturation of the peaks and the troughs of the responses. The model for the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) was the convolution of a unit potential and population cycle histogram with a parameter for spread of excitation. Phases of the ANN and CM were additional parameters. The average cycle from the ongoing response was the input, and adaptive fitting identified CM and ANN parameters that best reproduced the waveform shape. Test datasets were responses recorded from the round windows of CI recipients, from the round window of gerbils before and after application of neurotoxins, and with simulated signals where each parameter could be manipulated in isolation. Waveforms recorded from 284 CI recipients had a variety of morphologies that the model fit with an average r(2) of 0.97 ± 0.058 (standard deviation). With simulated signals, small systematic differences between outputs and inputs were seen with some variable combinations, but in general there were limited interactions among the parameters. In gerbils, the CM reported was relatively unaffected by the neurotoxins. In contrast, the ANN was strongly reduced and the reduction was limited to frequencies of 1,000 Hz and lower, consistent with the range of strong neural phase-locking. Across human CI subjects, the ANN contribution was variable, ranging from nearly none to larger than the CM. Development of this model could provide a means to isolate hair cell and neural activity that are mixed in the ongoing response to low-frequency tones. This tool can help characterize the residual physiology across CI subjects, and can be useful in other clinical settings where a description of the cochlear physiology is desirable. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5662900/ /pubmed/29123468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592 Text en Copyright © 2017 Fontenot, Giardina and Fitzpatrick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fontenot, Tatyana E.
Giardina, Christopher K.
Fitzpatrick, Douglas C.
A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_full A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_fullStr A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_full_unstemmed A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_short A Model-Based Approach for Separating the Cochlear Microphonic from the Auditory Nerve Neurophonic in the Ongoing Response Using Electrocochleography
title_sort model-based approach for separating the cochlear microphonic from the auditory nerve neurophonic in the ongoing response using electrocochleography
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5662900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29123468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00592
work_keys_str_mv AT fontenottatyanae amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT giardinachristopherk amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT fitzpatrickdouglasc amodelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT fontenottatyanae modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT giardinachristopherk modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography
AT fitzpatrickdouglasc modelbasedapproachforseparatingthecochlearmicrophonicfromtheauditorynerveneurophonicintheongoingresponseusingelectrocochleography