Cargando…
Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6 |
_version_ | 1783274748526985216 |
---|---|
author | Zakarian, Joy M. Quintana, Penelope J. E. Winston, Carl H. Matt, Georg E. |
author_facet | Zakarian, Joy M. Quintana, Penelope J. E. Winston, Carl H. Matt, Georg E. |
author_sort | Zakarian, Joy M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July 3, 2017). Little is known, however, about how hotels’ smoking policies have been implemented. This study examined hotels’ smoking policies and their implementation. METHODS: A telephone survey of a random sample of 383 California hotel managers was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 60.6% of hotels reported that smoking was prohibited in all guest rooms, and 4.7% reported that smoking was prohibited everywhere on their property. While California law permitted smoking in up to 65% of guest rooms, only 6.9% of rooms were reported as smoking-permitted. Over 90% of hotels had smoking rooms scattered among nonsmoking rooms, and about half of the smoking hotels reported that guests requesting either smoking or nonsmoking rooms were sometimes assigned to the other room type. When guests smoked in nonsmoking rooms fees could be substantial, but were often uncollected. CONCLUSIONS: Hotel smoking policies and their implementation fall short of protecting nonsmoking guests and workers from exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke. Complete indoor smoking bans for all hotels are needed to close existing loopholes. Nonsmokers who wish to protect themselves from exposure to tobacco smoke should avoid hotels that permit smoking and instead stay in completely smoke-free hotels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5663030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56630302017-11-01 Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers Zakarian, Joy M. Quintana, Penelope J. E. Winston, Carl H. Matt, Georg E. Tob Induc Dis Research BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July 3, 2017). Little is known, however, about how hotels’ smoking policies have been implemented. This study examined hotels’ smoking policies and their implementation. METHODS: A telephone survey of a random sample of 383 California hotel managers was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 60.6% of hotels reported that smoking was prohibited in all guest rooms, and 4.7% reported that smoking was prohibited everywhere on their property. While California law permitted smoking in up to 65% of guest rooms, only 6.9% of rooms were reported as smoking-permitted. Over 90% of hotels had smoking rooms scattered among nonsmoking rooms, and about half of the smoking hotels reported that guests requesting either smoking or nonsmoking rooms were sometimes assigned to the other room type. When guests smoked in nonsmoking rooms fees could be substantial, but were often uncollected. CONCLUSIONS: Hotel smoking policies and their implementation fall short of protecting nonsmoking guests and workers from exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke. Complete indoor smoking bans for all hotels are needed to close existing loopholes. Nonsmokers who wish to protect themselves from exposure to tobacco smoke should avoid hotels that permit smoking and instead stay in completely smoke-free hotels. BioMed Central 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5663030/ /pubmed/29093657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zakarian, Joy M. Quintana, Penelope J. E. Winston, Carl H. Matt, Georg E. Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title | Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title_full | Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title_fullStr | Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title_full_unstemmed | Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title_short | Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers |
title_sort | hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of california hotel managers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakarianjoym hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers AT quintanapenelopeje hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers AT winstoncarlh hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers AT mattgeorge hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers |