Cargando…

Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers

BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakarian, Joy M., Quintana, Penelope J. E., Winston, Carl H., Matt, Georg E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6
_version_ 1783274748526985216
author Zakarian, Joy M.
Quintana, Penelope J. E.
Winston, Carl H.
Matt, Georg E.
author_facet Zakarian, Joy M.
Quintana, Penelope J. E.
Winston, Carl H.
Matt, Georg E.
author_sort Zakarian, Joy M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July 3, 2017). Little is known, however, about how hotels’ smoking policies have been implemented. This study examined hotels’ smoking policies and their implementation. METHODS: A telephone survey of a random sample of 383 California hotel managers was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 60.6% of hotels reported that smoking was prohibited in all guest rooms, and 4.7% reported that smoking was prohibited everywhere on their property. While California law permitted smoking in up to 65% of guest rooms, only 6.9% of rooms were reported as smoking-permitted. Over 90% of hotels had smoking rooms scattered among nonsmoking rooms, and about half of the smoking hotels reported that guests requesting either smoking or nonsmoking rooms were sometimes assigned to the other room type. When guests smoked in nonsmoking rooms fees could be substantial, but were often uncollected. CONCLUSIONS: Hotel smoking policies and their implementation fall short of protecting nonsmoking guests and workers from exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke. Complete indoor smoking bans for all hotels are needed to close existing loopholes. Nonsmokers who wish to protect themselves from exposure to tobacco smoke should avoid hotels that permit smoking and instead stay in completely smoke-free hotels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56630302017-11-01 Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers Zakarian, Joy M. Quintana, Penelope J. E. Winston, Carl H. Matt, Georg E. Tob Induc Dis Research BACKGROUND: Most states in the U.S. permit hotels to allow smoking in some guest rooms, and only five (Indiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin) require that all hotel and motel rooms be 100% smoke-free (State and local 100% smokefree hotel and motel guest room laws enacted as of July 3, 2017). Little is known, however, about how hotels’ smoking policies have been implemented. This study examined hotels’ smoking policies and their implementation. METHODS: A telephone survey of a random sample of 383 California hotel managers was conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 60.6% of hotels reported that smoking was prohibited in all guest rooms, and 4.7% reported that smoking was prohibited everywhere on their property. While California law permitted smoking in up to 65% of guest rooms, only 6.9% of rooms were reported as smoking-permitted. Over 90% of hotels had smoking rooms scattered among nonsmoking rooms, and about half of the smoking hotels reported that guests requesting either smoking or nonsmoking rooms were sometimes assigned to the other room type. When guests smoked in nonsmoking rooms fees could be substantial, but were often uncollected. CONCLUSIONS: Hotel smoking policies and their implementation fall short of protecting nonsmoking guests and workers from exposure to secondhand and thirdhand smoke. Complete indoor smoking bans for all hotels are needed to close existing loopholes. Nonsmokers who wish to protect themselves from exposure to tobacco smoke should avoid hotels that permit smoking and instead stay in completely smoke-free hotels. BioMed Central 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5663030/ /pubmed/29093657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zakarian, Joy M.
Quintana, Penelope J. E.
Winston, Carl H.
Matt, Georg E.
Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title_full Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title_fullStr Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title_full_unstemmed Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title_short Hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of California hotel managers
title_sort hotel smoking policies and their implementation: a survey of california hotel managers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0147-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zakarianjoym hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers
AT quintanapenelopeje hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers
AT winstoncarlh hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers
AT mattgeorge hotelsmokingpoliciesandtheirimplementationasurveyofcaliforniahotelmanagers