Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial showed that artemisinin–naphthoquine (AN) was non-inferior to artemether–lumefantrine (AL) for falciparum malaria and superior for vivax malaria in young Papua New Guinean children. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of these two regimen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Brioni R., Davis, Wendy A., Clarke, Philip M., Robinson, Leanne J., Laman, Moses, Davis, Timothy M. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2081-8
_version_ 1783274751361286144
author Moore, Brioni R.
Davis, Wendy A.
Clarke, Philip M.
Robinson, Leanne J.
Laman, Moses
Davis, Timothy M. E.
author_facet Moore, Brioni R.
Davis, Wendy A.
Clarke, Philip M.
Robinson, Leanne J.
Laman, Moses
Davis, Timothy M. E.
author_sort Moore, Brioni R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial showed that artemisinin–naphthoquine (AN) was non-inferior to artemether–lumefantrine (AL) for falciparum malaria and superior for vivax malaria in young Papua New Guinean children. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of these two regimens. METHODS: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using data from 231 children with Plasmodium falciparum and/or Plasmodium vivax infections in an open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. Recruited children were randomized 1:1 to receive once daily AN for 3 days with water or twice daily AL for 3 days given with fat. World Health Organisation (WHO) definitions were used to determine clinical/parasitological outcomes. The cost of transport between the home and clinic, plus direct health-care costs, served as a basis for determining each regimen’s incremental cost per incremental treatment success relative to AL by Day 42 and its cost per life year saved. RESULTS: In the usual care setting, AN was more effective for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children aged 0.5–5.9 years. AL and AN were equally efficacious for the treatment of falciparum malaria, however AN had increased anti-malarial treatment costs per patient of $10.46, compared with AL. AN was the most effective regimen for treatment of vivax malaria, but had increased treatment costs of $14.83 per treatment success compared with AL. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst AN has superior overall efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in PNG children, AL was the less costly regimen. An indicative extrapolation estimated the cost per life year saved by using AN instead of AL to treat uncomplicated malaria to be $12,165 for girls and $12,469 for boys (discounted), which means AN may not be cost-effective and affordable for PNG at current cost. However, AN may become acceptable should it become WHO prequalified and/or should donated/subsidized drug supply become available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56630422017-11-01 Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children Moore, Brioni R. Davis, Wendy A. Clarke, Philip M. Robinson, Leanne J. Laman, Moses Davis, Timothy M. E. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: A recent randomized trial showed that artemisinin–naphthoquine (AN) was non-inferior to artemether–lumefantrine (AL) for falciparum malaria and superior for vivax malaria in young Papua New Guinean children. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of these two regimens. METHODS: An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using data from 231 children with Plasmodium falciparum and/or Plasmodium vivax infections in an open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. Recruited children were randomized 1:1 to receive once daily AN for 3 days with water or twice daily AL for 3 days given with fat. World Health Organisation (WHO) definitions were used to determine clinical/parasitological outcomes. The cost of transport between the home and clinic, plus direct health-care costs, served as a basis for determining each regimen’s incremental cost per incremental treatment success relative to AL by Day 42 and its cost per life year saved. RESULTS: In the usual care setting, AN was more effective for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children aged 0.5–5.9 years. AL and AN were equally efficacious for the treatment of falciparum malaria, however AN had increased anti-malarial treatment costs per patient of $10.46, compared with AL. AN was the most effective regimen for treatment of vivax malaria, but had increased treatment costs of $14.83 per treatment success compared with AL. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst AN has superior overall efficacy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in PNG children, AL was the less costly regimen. An indicative extrapolation estimated the cost per life year saved by using AN instead of AL to treat uncomplicated malaria to be $12,165 for girls and $12,469 for boys (discounted), which means AN may not be cost-effective and affordable for PNG at current cost. However, AN may become acceptable should it become WHO prequalified and/or should donated/subsidized drug supply become available. BioMed Central 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5663042/ /pubmed/29084540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2081-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Moore, Brioni R.
Davis, Wendy A.
Clarke, Philip M.
Robinson, Leanne J.
Laman, Moses
Davis, Timothy M. E.
Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title_full Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title_short Cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Papua New Guinean children
title_sort cost-effectiveness of artemisinin–naphthoquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in papua new guinean children
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2081-8
work_keys_str_mv AT moorebrionir costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren
AT daviswendya costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren
AT clarkephilipm costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren
AT robinsonleannej costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren
AT lamanmoses costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren
AT davistimothyme costeffectivenessofartemisininnaphthoquineversusartemetherlumefantrineforthetreatmentofuncomplicatedmalariainpapuanewguineanchildren