Cargando…
Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey
BACKGROUND: Theories provide a synthesizing architecture for implementation science. The underuse, superficial use, and misuse of theories pose a substantial scientific challenge for implementation science and may relate to challenges in selecting from the many theories in the field. Implementation...
Autores principales: | Birken, Sarah A., Powell, Byron J., Shea, Christopher M., Haines, Emily R., Alexis Kirk, M., Leeman, Jennifer, Rohweder, Catherine, Damschroder, Laura, Presseau, Justin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool
por: Birken, Sarah A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice
por: Leeman, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review
por: Birken, Sarah A., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
por: Kirk, M. Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research
por: Birken, Sarah A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)