Cargando…

A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection

BACKGROUND: Literature data suggest that multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including morphologic T2-weigthed images (T2-MRI) and functional approaches such as Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fusco, Roberta, Sansone, Mario, Granata, Vincenza, Setola, Sergio Venanzio, Petrillo, Antonella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-017-0168-z
_version_ 1783274764891062272
author Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Setola, Sergio Venanzio
Petrillo, Antonella
author_facet Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Setola, Sergio Venanzio
Petrillo, Antonella
author_sort Fusco, Roberta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Literature data suggest that multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including morphologic T2-weigthed images (T2-MRI) and functional approaches such as Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI), give an added value in the prostate cancer localization and local staging. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of literature about the role and the potentiality of morphological and functional MRI in prostate cancer, also in a multimodal / multiparametric approach, and we reported the diagnostic accuracy results for different imaging modalities and for different MR coil settings: endorectal coil (ERC) and phased array coil (PAC). Forest plots and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty three papers were identified for the systematic review. Sensitivity and specificity values were, respectively, for T2-MRI of 75% and of 60%, for DCE-MRI of 80% and of 72%, for MRSI of 89% and of 69%, for combined T2-MRI and DCE-MRI of 87% and of 46%, for combined T2-MRI and MRSI of 79% and of 57%, for combined T2-MRI, DWI and DCE-MRI of 81% and of 84%, and for combined MRSI and DCE-MRI of 83% and of 83%. For MRI studies performed with ERC we obtained a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% and of 66% while the pooled values for MRI studies performed with PAC were of 78% and of 64%, respectively (p>0.05 at McNemar test). No studies were excluded from the analysis based on the quality assessment. CONCLUSIONS: ERC use yielded no additional benefit in terms of prostate cancer detection accuracy compared to multi-channel PAC use (71% versus 68%) while the use of additional functional imaging techniques (DCE-MRI, DWI and MRSI) in a multiparametric MRI protocol improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection allowing both the early cure and the guidance of biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56630982017-11-01 A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection Fusco, Roberta Sansone, Mario Granata, Vincenza Setola, Sergio Venanzio Petrillo, Antonella Infect Agent Cancer Review BACKGROUND: Literature data suggest that multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), including morphologic T2-weigthed images (T2-MRI) and functional approaches such as Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI), Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI), give an added value in the prostate cancer localization and local staging. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of literature about the role and the potentiality of morphological and functional MRI in prostate cancer, also in a multimodal / multiparametric approach, and we reported the diagnostic accuracy results for different imaging modalities and for different MR coil settings: endorectal coil (ERC) and phased array coil (PAC). Forest plots and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Risk of bias and the applicability at study level were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty three papers were identified for the systematic review. Sensitivity and specificity values were, respectively, for T2-MRI of 75% and of 60%, for DCE-MRI of 80% and of 72%, for MRSI of 89% and of 69%, for combined T2-MRI and DCE-MRI of 87% and of 46%, for combined T2-MRI and MRSI of 79% and of 57%, for combined T2-MRI, DWI and DCE-MRI of 81% and of 84%, and for combined MRSI and DCE-MRI of 83% and of 83%. For MRI studies performed with ERC we obtained a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% and of 66% while the pooled values for MRI studies performed with PAC were of 78% and of 64%, respectively (p>0.05 at McNemar test). No studies were excluded from the analysis based on the quality assessment. CONCLUSIONS: ERC use yielded no additional benefit in terms of prostate cancer detection accuracy compared to multi-channel PAC use (71% versus 68%) while the use of additional functional imaging techniques (DCE-MRI, DWI and MRSI) in a multiparametric MRI protocol improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection allowing both the early cure and the guidance of biopsy. BioMed Central 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5663098/ /pubmed/29093748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-017-0168-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Fusco, Roberta
Sansone, Mario
Granata, Vincenza
Setola, Sergio Venanzio
Petrillo, Antonella
A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title_full A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title_fullStr A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title_short A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection
title_sort systematic review on multiparametric mr imaging in prostate cancer detection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-017-0168-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fuscoroberta asystematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT sansonemario asystematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT granatavincenza asystematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT setolasergiovenanzio asystematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT petrilloantonella asystematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT fuscoroberta systematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT sansonemario systematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT granatavincenza systematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT setolasergiovenanzio systematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection
AT petrilloantonella systematicreviewonmultiparametricmrimaginginprostatecancerdetection