Cargando…

Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design

BACKGROUND: Detailed descriptions of implementation strategies are lacking, and there is a corresponding dearth of information regarding methods employed in implementation strategy development. This paper describes methods and findings related to the alpha testing of eLearning modules developed as p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahonen, Emily Q., Watson, Dennis P., Adams, Erin L., McGuire, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y
_version_ 1783274769384210432
author Ahonen, Emily Q.
Watson, Dennis P.
Adams, Erin L.
McGuire, Alan
author_facet Ahonen, Emily Q.
Watson, Dennis P.
Adams, Erin L.
McGuire, Alan
author_sort Ahonen, Emily Q.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Detailed descriptions of implementation strategies are lacking, and there is a corresponding dearth of information regarding methods employed in implementation strategy development. This paper describes methods and findings related to the alpha testing of eLearning modules developed as part of the Housing First Technical Assistance and Training (HFTAT) program’s development. Alpha testing is an approach for improving the quality of a product prior to beta (i.e., real world) testing with potential applications for intervention development. METHODS: Ten participants in two cities tested the modules. We collected data through (1) a structured log where participants were asked to record their experiences as they worked through the modules; (2) a brief online questionnaire delivered at the end of each module; and (3) focus groups. RESULTS: The alpha test provided useful data related to the acceptability and feasibility of eLearning as an implementation strategy, as well as identifying a number of technical issues and bugs. Each of the qualitative methods used provided unique and valuable information. In particular, logs were the most useful for identifying technical issues, and focus groups provided high quality data regarding how the intervention could best be used as an implementation strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha testing was a valuable step in intervention development, providing us an understanding of issues that would have been more difficult to address at a later stage of the study. As a result, we were able to improve the modules prior to pilot testing of the entire HFTAT. Researchers wishing to alpha test interventions prior to piloting should balance the unique benefits of different data collection approaches with the need to minimize burdens for themselves and participants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56631172017-11-01 Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design Ahonen, Emily Q. Watson, Dennis P. Adams, Erin L. McGuire, Alan Pilot Feasibility Stud Methodology BACKGROUND: Detailed descriptions of implementation strategies are lacking, and there is a corresponding dearth of information regarding methods employed in implementation strategy development. This paper describes methods and findings related to the alpha testing of eLearning modules developed as part of the Housing First Technical Assistance and Training (HFTAT) program’s development. Alpha testing is an approach for improving the quality of a product prior to beta (i.e., real world) testing with potential applications for intervention development. METHODS: Ten participants in two cities tested the modules. We collected data through (1) a structured log where participants were asked to record their experiences as they worked through the modules; (2) a brief online questionnaire delivered at the end of each module; and (3) focus groups. RESULTS: The alpha test provided useful data related to the acceptability and feasibility of eLearning as an implementation strategy, as well as identifying a number of technical issues and bugs. Each of the qualitative methods used provided unique and valuable information. In particular, logs were the most useful for identifying technical issues, and focus groups provided high quality data regarding how the intervention could best be used as an implementation strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha testing was a valuable step in intervention development, providing us an understanding of issues that would have been more difficult to address at a later stage of the study. As a result, we were able to improve the modules prior to pilot testing of the entire HFTAT. Researchers wishing to alpha test interventions prior to piloting should balance the unique benefits of different data collection approaches with the need to minimize burdens for themselves and participants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5663117/ /pubmed/29093826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Ahonen, Emily Q.
Watson, Dennis P.
Adams, Erin L.
McGuire, Alan
Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title_full Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title_fullStr Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title_full_unstemmed Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title_short Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
title_sort alpha test results for a housing first elearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ahonenemilyq alphatestresultsforahousingfirstelearningstrategythevalueofmultiplequalitativemethodsforinterventiondesign
AT watsondennisp alphatestresultsforahousingfirstelearningstrategythevalueofmultiplequalitativemethodsforinterventiondesign
AT adamserinl alphatestresultsforahousingfirstelearningstrategythevalueofmultiplequalitativemethodsforinterventiondesign
AT mcguirealan alphatestresultsforahousingfirstelearningstrategythevalueofmultiplequalitativemethodsforinterventiondesign