Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xin, Wang, Junpeng, Yao, Yun, Yang, Lei, Li, Zhiqin, Yu, Cheng, Zhao, Peiyan, Yu, Yongli, Wang, Liying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137370
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906
_version_ 1783274828657065984
author Li, Xin
Wang, Junpeng
Yao, Yun
Yang, Lei
Li, Zhiqin
Yu, Cheng
Zhao, Peiyan
Yu, Yongli
Wang, Liying
author_facet Li, Xin
Wang, Junpeng
Yao, Yun
Yang, Lei
Li, Zhiqin
Yu, Cheng
Zhao, Peiyan
Yu, Yongli
Wang, Liying
author_sort Li, Xin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related treatments for advanced melanoma. Analysis was done on a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Twelve trials including 5413 patients were identified. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were significantly more efficacious for progression-free survival (PFS) than ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38, 0.50, and 0.58, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.45, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively), or ipilimumab plus sargramostim (0.44, 0.57, and 0.67, respectively). Ipilimumab plus gp100 was significantly less efficacious for PFS than the remaining eight immune checkpoint inhibitor-related strategies. Pembrolizumab was significantly more efficacious than ipilimumab and ipilimumab plus gp100 (HR, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively) in improving overall survival (OS). Nivolumab significantly improved OS over tremelimumab (HR, 0.48). Ipilimumab plus sargramostim was ranked the second most effective strategy in terms of OS and well tolerated. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab showed the best profile of acceptability, with significantly less high-grade adverse events than ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.49 and 0.50, respectively), tremelimumab (0.21 and 0.21, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.13 and 0.13, respectively), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (0.15 and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus sargramostim might be optimum treatments for advanced melanoma because they have the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is the most effective in prolonging PFS, but is far more toxic than nivolumab and pembrolizumab.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56635422017-11-13 Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis Li, Xin Wang, Junpeng Yao, Yun Yang, Lei Li, Zhiqin Yu, Cheng Zhao, Peiyan Yu, Yongli Wang, Liying Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related treatments for advanced melanoma. Analysis was done on a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Twelve trials including 5413 patients were identified. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were significantly more efficacious for progression-free survival (PFS) than ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38, 0.50, and 0.58, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.45, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively), or ipilimumab plus sargramostim (0.44, 0.57, and 0.67, respectively). Ipilimumab plus gp100 was significantly less efficacious for PFS than the remaining eight immune checkpoint inhibitor-related strategies. Pembrolizumab was significantly more efficacious than ipilimumab and ipilimumab plus gp100 (HR, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively) in improving overall survival (OS). Nivolumab significantly improved OS over tremelimumab (HR, 0.48). Ipilimumab plus sargramostim was ranked the second most effective strategy in terms of OS and well tolerated. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab showed the best profile of acceptability, with significantly less high-grade adverse events than ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.49 and 0.50, respectively), tremelimumab (0.21 and 0.21, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.13 and 0.13, respectively), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (0.15 and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus sargramostim might be optimum treatments for advanced melanoma because they have the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is the most effective in prolonging PFS, but is far more toxic than nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5663542/ /pubmed/29137370 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Li et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Li, Xin
Wang, Junpeng
Yao, Yun
Yang, Lei
Li, Zhiqin
Yu, Cheng
Zhao, Peiyan
Yu, Yongli
Wang, Liying
Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a bayesian network analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137370
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906
work_keys_str_mv AT lixin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT wangjunpeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT yaoyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT yanglei comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT lizhiqin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT yucheng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT zhaopeiyan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT yuyongli comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis
AT wangliying comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis