Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137370 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906 |
_version_ | 1783274828657065984 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xin Wang, Junpeng Yao, Yun Yang, Lei Li, Zhiqin Yu, Cheng Zhao, Peiyan Yu, Yongli Wang, Liying |
author_facet | Li, Xin Wang, Junpeng Yao, Yun Yang, Lei Li, Zhiqin Yu, Cheng Zhao, Peiyan Yu, Yongli Wang, Liying |
author_sort | Li, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related treatments for advanced melanoma. Analysis was done on a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Twelve trials including 5413 patients were identified. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were significantly more efficacious for progression-free survival (PFS) than ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38, 0.50, and 0.58, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.45, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively), or ipilimumab plus sargramostim (0.44, 0.57, and 0.67, respectively). Ipilimumab plus gp100 was significantly less efficacious for PFS than the remaining eight immune checkpoint inhibitor-related strategies. Pembrolizumab was significantly more efficacious than ipilimumab and ipilimumab plus gp100 (HR, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively) in improving overall survival (OS). Nivolumab significantly improved OS over tremelimumab (HR, 0.48). Ipilimumab plus sargramostim was ranked the second most effective strategy in terms of OS and well tolerated. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab showed the best profile of acceptability, with significantly less high-grade adverse events than ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.49 and 0.50, respectively), tremelimumab (0.21 and 0.21, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.13 and 0.13, respectively), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (0.15 and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus sargramostim might be optimum treatments for advanced melanoma because they have the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is the most effective in prolonging PFS, but is far more toxic than nivolumab and pembrolizumab. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5663542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56635422017-11-13 Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis Li, Xin Wang, Junpeng Yao, Yun Yang, Lei Li, Zhiqin Yu, Cheng Zhao, Peiyan Yu, Yongli Wang, Liying Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare and rank the effects of 9 immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for treating advanced melanoma. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Cochrane databases, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-related treatments for advanced melanoma. Analysis was done on a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Twelve trials including 5413 patients were identified. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were significantly more efficacious for progression-free survival (PFS) than ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38, 0.50, and 0.58, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.45, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively), or ipilimumab plus sargramostim (0.44, 0.57, and 0.67, respectively). Ipilimumab plus gp100 was significantly less efficacious for PFS than the remaining eight immune checkpoint inhibitor-related strategies. Pembrolizumab was significantly more efficacious than ipilimumab and ipilimumab plus gp100 (HR, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively) in improving overall survival (OS). Nivolumab significantly improved OS over tremelimumab (HR, 0.48). Ipilimumab plus sargramostim was ranked the second most effective strategy in terms of OS and well tolerated. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab showed the best profile of acceptability, with significantly less high-grade adverse events than ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.49 and 0.50, respectively), tremelimumab (0.21 and 0.21, respectively), ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (0.13 and 0.13, respectively), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (0.15 and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab plus sargramostim might be optimum treatments for advanced melanoma because they have the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is the most effective in prolonging PFS, but is far more toxic than nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5663542/ /pubmed/29137370 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Li et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Li, Xin Wang, Junpeng Yao, Yun Yang, Lei Li, Zhiqin Yu, Cheng Zhao, Peiyan Yu, Yongli Wang, Liying Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a Bayesian network analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related therapies for advanced melanoma: a bayesian network analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137370 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT wangjunpeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT yaoyun comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT yanglei comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT lizhiqin comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT yucheng comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT zhaopeiyan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT yuyongli comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis AT wangliying comparativeefficacyandsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorrelatedtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaabayesiannetworkanalysis |