Cargando…
Prognostic value of long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 in various carcinomas: a meta-analysis
A number of studies have revealed that zinc finger antisense 1 (ZFAS1), a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), is aberrantly regulated in various cancers, and high ZFAS1 expression is associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). This meta-analysis was conducted to identi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29137442 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21100 |
Sumario: | A number of studies have revealed that zinc finger antisense 1 (ZFAS1), a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), is aberrantly regulated in various cancers, and high ZFAS1 expression is associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). This meta-analysis was conducted to identify the potential value of ZFAS1 as a biomarker for cancer prognosis. We searched electronic database PubMed, Web of Science, and China Wanfang Data (up to June 1, 2017) to collect all relevant studies and explore the association of ZFAS1 expression with overall survival (OS) and LNM. The results showed that cancer patients with high ZFAS1 expression had a worse OS than those with low ZFAS1 expression (HR: 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41–2.47, P < 0.001), and high ZFAS1 expression was significantly associated with LNM (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.54–4.42, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that high ZFAS1 expression was significantly related to high incidence of LNM in subgroups of sample size more than 88 (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 2.06–4.86, P < 0.001), non-digestive system malignancies (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 2.49–6.60, P < 0.001), and studies reported in 2017 (OR: 4.86, 95% CI: 2.67–8.84, P < 0.001) without significant heterogeneity. Further meta-regression by the covariates showed that tumor type, sample size, quality score, cut off value and publication year did not result in the inter-study heterogeneity. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis demonstrates that high ZFAS1 expression may potentially serve as a reliable biomarker for poor clinical outcome in various cancers. |
---|