Cargando…
A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneousl...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3 |
_version_ | 1783274883454599168 |
---|---|
author | Timmerman, A. A. Dijkstra, J. |
author_facet | Timmerman, A. A. Dijkstra, J. |
author_sort | Timmerman, A. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5663798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56637982017-11-16 A practical approach to programmatic assessment design Timmerman, A. A. Dijkstra, J. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Article Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme. Springer Netherlands 2017-01-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5663798/ /pubmed/28120259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Timmerman, A. A. Dijkstra, J. A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title | A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title_full | A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title_fullStr | A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title_full_unstemmed | A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title_short | A practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
title_sort | practical approach to programmatic assessment design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmermanaa apracticalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign AT dijkstraj apracticalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign AT timmermanaa practicalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign AT dijkstraj practicalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign |