Cargando…

A practical approach to programmatic assessment design

Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneousl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmerman, A. A., Dijkstra, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3
_version_ 1783274883454599168
author Timmerman, A. A.
Dijkstra, J.
author_facet Timmerman, A. A.
Dijkstra, J.
author_sort Timmerman, A. A.
collection PubMed
description Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5663798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56637982017-11-16 A practical approach to programmatic assessment design Timmerman, A. A. Dijkstra, J. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Article Assessment of complex tasks integrating several competencies calls for a programmatic design approach. As single instruments do not provide the information required to reach a robust judgment of integral performance, 73 guidelines for programmatic assessment design were developed. When simultaneously applying these interrelated guidelines, it is challenging to keep a clear overview of all assessment activities. The goal of this study was to provide practical support for applying a programmatic approach to assessment design, not bound to any specific educational paradigm. The guidelines were first applied in a postgraduate medical training setting, and a process analysis was conducted. This resulted in the identification of four steps for programmatic assessment design: evaluation, contextualisation, prioritisation and justification. Firstly, the (re)design process starts with sufficiently detailing the assessment environment and formulating the principal purpose. Key stakeholders with sufficient (assessment) expertise need to be involved in the analysis of strengths and weaknesses and identification of developmental needs. Central governance is essential to balance efforts and stakes with the principal purpose and decide on prioritisation of design decisions and selection of relevant guidelines. Finally, justification of assessment design decisions, quality assurance and external accountability close the loop, to ensure sound underpinning and continuous improvement of the assessment programme. Springer Netherlands 2017-01-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5663798/ /pubmed/28120259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Timmerman, A. A.
Dijkstra, J.
A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title_full A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title_fullStr A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title_full_unstemmed A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title_short A practical approach to programmatic assessment design
title_sort practical approach to programmatic assessment design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5663798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28120259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9756-3
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermanaa apracticalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign
AT dijkstraj apracticalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign
AT timmermanaa practicalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign
AT dijkstraj practicalapproachtoprogrammaticassessmentdesign