Cargando…

Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper reports on a survey that explores the impact of three non-native domestic carnivores—dogs, cats, and ferrets—on the native wildlife of the United States (US) and Canada. Government agencies were asked to document the number and frequency of sightings, and the degree of con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lepe, Ana, Kaplan, Valerie, Arreaza, Alirio, Szpanderfer, Robert, Bristol, David, Sinclair, M. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani7100078
_version_ 1783274925992181760
author Lepe, Ana
Kaplan, Valerie
Arreaza, Alirio
Szpanderfer, Robert
Bristol, David
Sinclair, M. Scott
author_facet Lepe, Ana
Kaplan, Valerie
Arreaza, Alirio
Szpanderfer, Robert
Bristol, David
Sinclair, M. Scott
author_sort Lepe, Ana
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper reports on a survey that explores the impact of three non-native domestic carnivores—dogs, cats, and ferrets—on the native wildlife of the United States (US) and Canada. Government agencies were asked to document the number and frequency of sightings, and the degree of concern resulting from free-roaming animals on urban, suburban, rural, recreational areas, and wildlands in their jurisdictions. Results confirm the existence of free-roaming cats and dogs throughout North America, as well as their profound impact on native wildlife, with cats being the major offenders. Except for an occasional stray, free-roaming ferrets were “never” or “rarely seen”; no agency reported that ferrets caused environmental harm. This is the first study to compare the relative impact of free-roaming dogs, cats, and ferrets. It shows differences in how these three animals react to novel environments. For the US and Canada, free roaming cats and dogs meet the definition of an “invasive” species, whereas ferrets do not. However, the way we as a society view these animals, our attitudes and perceptions, may influence how governmental agencies manage and control them. ABSTRACT: A survey of the United States and Canadian governmental agencies investigated the environmental impact and relative invasiveness of free-roaming domestic non-native carnivores—dogs, cats, and ferrets. Agencies represented wildlife, fish, game, natural or environmental resources, parks and recreation, veterinary and human health, animal control, and agriculture. Respondents were asked to document the number and frequency of sightings of unconfined animals, evidence for environmental harm, and the resulting “degree of concern” in their respective jurisdictions. Results confirmed the existence of feral (breeding) cats and dogs, documenting high levels of concern regarding the impact of these animals on both continental and surrounding insular habitats. Except for occasional strays, no free-roaming or feral ferrets were reported; nor were there reports of ferrets impacting native wildlife, including ground-nesting birds, or sensitive species. This is the first study to report the relative impact of free-roaming domestic carnivores. Dogs and cats meet the current definition of “invasive” species, whereas ferrets do not. Differences in how each species impacts the North American environment highlights the complex interaction between non-native species and their environment. Public attitudes and perceptions regarding these species may be a factor in their control and agency management priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5664037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56640372017-11-06 Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies Lepe, Ana Kaplan, Valerie Arreaza, Alirio Szpanderfer, Robert Bristol, David Sinclair, M. Scott Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper reports on a survey that explores the impact of three non-native domestic carnivores—dogs, cats, and ferrets—on the native wildlife of the United States (US) and Canada. Government agencies were asked to document the number and frequency of sightings, and the degree of concern resulting from free-roaming animals on urban, suburban, rural, recreational areas, and wildlands in their jurisdictions. Results confirm the existence of free-roaming cats and dogs throughout North America, as well as their profound impact on native wildlife, with cats being the major offenders. Except for an occasional stray, free-roaming ferrets were “never” or “rarely seen”; no agency reported that ferrets caused environmental harm. This is the first study to compare the relative impact of free-roaming dogs, cats, and ferrets. It shows differences in how these three animals react to novel environments. For the US and Canada, free roaming cats and dogs meet the definition of an “invasive” species, whereas ferrets do not. However, the way we as a society view these animals, our attitudes and perceptions, may influence how governmental agencies manage and control them. ABSTRACT: A survey of the United States and Canadian governmental agencies investigated the environmental impact and relative invasiveness of free-roaming domestic non-native carnivores—dogs, cats, and ferrets. Agencies represented wildlife, fish, game, natural or environmental resources, parks and recreation, veterinary and human health, animal control, and agriculture. Respondents were asked to document the number and frequency of sightings of unconfined animals, evidence for environmental harm, and the resulting “degree of concern” in their respective jurisdictions. Results confirmed the existence of feral (breeding) cats and dogs, documenting high levels of concern regarding the impact of these animals on both continental and surrounding insular habitats. Except for occasional strays, no free-roaming or feral ferrets were reported; nor were there reports of ferrets impacting native wildlife, including ground-nesting birds, or sensitive species. This is the first study to report the relative impact of free-roaming domestic carnivores. Dogs and cats meet the current definition of “invasive” species, whereas ferrets do not. Differences in how each species impacts the North American environment highlights the complex interaction between non-native species and their environment. Public attitudes and perceptions regarding these species may be a factor in their control and agency management priorities. MDPI 2017-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5664037/ /pubmed/29036923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani7100078 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lepe, Ana
Kaplan, Valerie
Arreaza, Alirio
Szpanderfer, Robert
Bristol, David
Sinclair, M. Scott
Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title_full Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title_fullStr Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title_short Environmental Impact and Relative Invasiveness of Free-Roaming Domestic Carnivores—a North American Survey of Governmental Agencies
title_sort environmental impact and relative invasiveness of free-roaming domestic carnivores—a north american survey of governmental agencies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29036923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani7100078
work_keys_str_mv AT lepeana environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies
AT kaplanvalerie environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies
AT arreazaalirio environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies
AT szpanderferrobert environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies
AT bristoldavid environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies
AT sinclairmscott environmentalimpactandrelativeinvasivenessoffreeroamingdomesticcarnivoresanorthamericansurveyofgovernmentalagencies