Cargando…

Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Outcome studies for eating disorders regularly measure pathology change or remission as the only outcome. Researchers, patients and recovered individuals highlight the importance of using additional criteria for measuring eating disorder recovery. There is no clear consensus on which add...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vos, Jan Alexander, LaMarre, Andrea, Radstaak, Mirjam, Bijkerk, Charlotte Ariane, Bohlmeijer, Ernst T., Westerhof, Gerben J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0164-0
_version_ 1783275073253146624
author de Vos, Jan Alexander
LaMarre, Andrea
Radstaak, Mirjam
Bijkerk, Charlotte Ariane
Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
Westerhof, Gerben J.
author_facet de Vos, Jan Alexander
LaMarre, Andrea
Radstaak, Mirjam
Bijkerk, Charlotte Ariane
Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
Westerhof, Gerben J.
author_sort de Vos, Jan Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outcome studies for eating disorders regularly measure pathology change or remission as the only outcome. Researchers, patients and recovered individuals highlight the importance of using additional criteria for measuring eating disorder recovery. There is no clear consensus on which additional criteria are most fundamental. Studies focusing on the perspectives of recovered patients show criteria which are closely related to dimensions of positive functioning as conceptualized in the complete mental health model. The aim of this study was to identify fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery according to recovered individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and a qualitative meta-analytic approach were used. Eighteen studies with recovered individuals and meeting various quality criteria were included. The result sections of the included papers were searched for themes that were stated as criteria for recovery or ‘being recovered’. All themes were analyzed using a meta-summary technique. Themes were labeled into criteria for recovery and the frequency of the found criteria was examined. RESULTS: In addition to the remission of eating disorder pathology, dimensions of psychological well-being and self-adaptability/resilience were found to be fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery. The most frequently mentioned criteria were: self-acceptance, positive relationships, personal growth, decrease in eating disorder behavior/cognitions, self-adaptability/resilience and autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: People who have recovered rate psychological well-being as a central criterion for ED recovery in addition to the remission of eating disorder symptoms. Supplementary criteria, besides symptom remission, are needed to measure recovery. We recommend including measurements of psychological well-being and self-adaptability/resilience in future research, such as outcome studies and in routine outcome measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5664841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56648412017-11-08 Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis de Vos, Jan Alexander LaMarre, Andrea Radstaak, Mirjam Bijkerk, Charlotte Ariane Bohlmeijer, Ernst T. Westerhof, Gerben J. J Eat Disord Review BACKGROUND: Outcome studies for eating disorders regularly measure pathology change or remission as the only outcome. Researchers, patients and recovered individuals highlight the importance of using additional criteria for measuring eating disorder recovery. There is no clear consensus on which additional criteria are most fundamental. Studies focusing on the perspectives of recovered patients show criteria which are closely related to dimensions of positive functioning as conceptualized in the complete mental health model. The aim of this study was to identify fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery according to recovered individuals. METHODS: A systematic review and a qualitative meta-analytic approach were used. Eighteen studies with recovered individuals and meeting various quality criteria were included. The result sections of the included papers were searched for themes that were stated as criteria for recovery or ‘being recovered’. All themes were analyzed using a meta-summary technique. Themes were labeled into criteria for recovery and the frequency of the found criteria was examined. RESULTS: In addition to the remission of eating disorder pathology, dimensions of psychological well-being and self-adaptability/resilience were found to be fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery. The most frequently mentioned criteria were: self-acceptance, positive relationships, personal growth, decrease in eating disorder behavior/cognitions, self-adaptability/resilience and autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: People who have recovered rate psychological well-being as a central criterion for ED recovery in addition to the remission of eating disorder symptoms. Supplementary criteria, besides symptom remission, are needed to measure recovery. We recommend including measurements of psychological well-being and self-adaptability/resilience in future research, such as outcome studies and in routine outcome measurement. BioMed Central 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5664841/ /pubmed/29118983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0164-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
de Vos, Jan Alexander
LaMarre, Andrea
Radstaak, Mirjam
Bijkerk, Charlotte Ariane
Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
Westerhof, Gerben J.
Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title_full Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title_fullStr Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title_short Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
title_sort identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29118983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0164-0
work_keys_str_mv AT devosjanalexander identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis
AT lamarreandrea identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis
AT radstaakmirjam identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis
AT bijkerkcharlotteariane identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis
AT bohlmeijerernstt identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis
AT westerhofgerbenj identifyingfundamentalcriteriaforeatingdisorderrecoveryasystematicreviewandqualitativemetaanalysis