Cargando…
Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pressure control and volume control ventilation are the most preferred modes of ventilator techniques available in the intraoperative period. The study compared the intraoperative ventilator and blood gas variables of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_16 |
_version_ | 1783275084449841152 |
---|---|
author | Moningi, Srilata Elmati, Praveen Kumar Rao, Prasad Kanithi, Geetha Kulkarni, Dilip Kumar Ramachandran, Gopinath |
author_facet | Moningi, Srilata Elmati, Praveen Kumar Rao, Prasad Kanithi, Geetha Kulkarni, Dilip Kumar Ramachandran, Gopinath |
author_sort | Moningi, Srilata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pressure control and volume control ventilation are the most preferred modes of ventilator techniques available in the intraoperative period. The study compared the intraoperative ventilator and blood gas variables of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: After obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee approval and informed consent, sixty patients scheduled for single level ACDF surgery performed in supine position under general anaesthesia were included. Group V (30 patients) received VCV and Group P (30 patients) received PCV. The primary objective was oxygenation variable PaO(2)/FiO(2) at different points of time i.e. T1–20 min after the institution of the ventilation, T2–20 min after placement of the retractors and T3–20 min after removal of the retractors. The secondary objectives include other arterial blood gas parameters, respiratory and haemodynamic parameters. NCSS version 9 statistical software was used for statistics. Two-way repeated measures for analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey Kramer test was used to analyse continuous variables for both intra- and inter-group comparisons, paired sample t-test for overall comparison and Chi-square test for categorical data. RESULTS: The primary variable PaO(2)/FiO(2) was comparable in both groups (P = 0.08). The respiratory variables, PAP and C(dynam) were statistically significant in PCV group compared to VCV (P < 0.05), though clinically insignificant. Other secondary variables were comparable. (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION: Clinically, both PCV and VCV group appear to be-equally suited ventilator techniques for anterior cervical spine surgery patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5664887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56648872017-12-14 Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery Moningi, Srilata Elmati, Praveen Kumar Rao, Prasad Kanithi, Geetha Kulkarni, Dilip Kumar Ramachandran, Gopinath Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pressure control and volume control ventilation are the most preferred modes of ventilator techniques available in the intraoperative period. The study compared the intraoperative ventilator and blood gas variables of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: After obtaining Institutional Ethical Committee approval and informed consent, sixty patients scheduled for single level ACDF surgery performed in supine position under general anaesthesia were included. Group V (30 patients) received VCV and Group P (30 patients) received PCV. The primary objective was oxygenation variable PaO(2)/FiO(2) at different points of time i.e. T1–20 min after the institution of the ventilation, T2–20 min after placement of the retractors and T3–20 min after removal of the retractors. The secondary objectives include other arterial blood gas parameters, respiratory and haemodynamic parameters. NCSS version 9 statistical software was used for statistics. Two-way repeated measures for analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey Kramer test was used to analyse continuous variables for both intra- and inter-group comparisons, paired sample t-test for overall comparison and Chi-square test for categorical data. RESULTS: The primary variable PaO(2)/FiO(2) was comparable in both groups (P = 0.08). The respiratory variables, PAP and C(dynam) were statistically significant in PCV group compared to VCV (P < 0.05), though clinically insignificant. Other secondary variables were comparable. (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION: Clinically, both PCV and VCV group appear to be-equally suited ventilator techniques for anterior cervical spine surgery patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5664887/ /pubmed/29242654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moningi, Srilata Elmati, Praveen Kumar Rao, Prasad Kanithi, Geetha Kulkarni, Dilip Kumar Ramachandran, Gopinath Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title | Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title_full | Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title_short | Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
title_sort | comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation in patients undergoing single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242654 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moningisrilata comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery AT elmatipraveenkumar comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery AT raoprasad comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery AT kanithigeetha comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery AT kulkarnidilipkumar comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery AT ramachandrangopinath comparisonofvolumecontrolandpressurecontrolventilationinpatientsundergoingsinglelevelanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionsurgery |