Cargando…
Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy?
In men undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer, erectile function is one of the most important health-related quality-of-life outcomes influencing patient choice in treatment. Penile rehabilitation has emerged as a therapeutic measure to prevent erectile dysfunction and expedite return of e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000Research
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152231 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12066.1 |
_version_ | 1783275100579037184 |
---|---|
author | Blecher, Gideon Almekaty, Khaled Kalejaiye, Odunayo Minhas, Suks |
author_facet | Blecher, Gideon Almekaty, Khaled Kalejaiye, Odunayo Minhas, Suks |
author_sort | Blecher, Gideon |
collection | PubMed |
description | In men undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer, erectile function is one of the most important health-related quality-of-life outcomes influencing patient choice in treatment. Penile rehabilitation has emerged as a therapeutic measure to prevent erectile dysfunction and expedite return of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Penile rehabilitation involves a program designed to increase the likelihood of return to baseline-level erectile function, as opposed to treatment, which implies the therapeutic treatment of symptoms, a key component of post–radical prostatectomy management. Several pathological theories form the basis for rehabilitation, and a plethora of treatments are currently in widespread use. However, whilst there is some evidence supporting the concept of penile rehabilitation from animal studies, randomised controlled trials are contradictory in outcomes. Similarly, urological guidelines are conflicted in terms of recommendations. Furthermore, it is clear that in spite of the lack of evidence for the role of penile rehabilitation, many urologists continue to employ some form of rehabilitation in their patients after radical prostatectomy. This is a significant burden to health resources in public-funded health economies, and no effective cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken to support this practice. Thus, further research is warranted to provide both scientific and clinical evidence for this contemporary practice and the development of preventative strategies in treating erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5664996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | F1000Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56649962017-11-17 Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? Blecher, Gideon Almekaty, Khaled Kalejaiye, Odunayo Minhas, Suks F1000Res Review In men undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer, erectile function is one of the most important health-related quality-of-life outcomes influencing patient choice in treatment. Penile rehabilitation has emerged as a therapeutic measure to prevent erectile dysfunction and expedite return of erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Penile rehabilitation involves a program designed to increase the likelihood of return to baseline-level erectile function, as opposed to treatment, which implies the therapeutic treatment of symptoms, a key component of post–radical prostatectomy management. Several pathological theories form the basis for rehabilitation, and a plethora of treatments are currently in widespread use. However, whilst there is some evidence supporting the concept of penile rehabilitation from animal studies, randomised controlled trials are contradictory in outcomes. Similarly, urological guidelines are conflicted in terms of recommendations. Furthermore, it is clear that in spite of the lack of evidence for the role of penile rehabilitation, many urologists continue to employ some form of rehabilitation in their patients after radical prostatectomy. This is a significant burden to health resources in public-funded health economies, and no effective cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken to support this practice. Thus, further research is warranted to provide both scientific and clinical evidence for this contemporary practice and the development of preventative strategies in treating erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. F1000Research 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5664996/ /pubmed/29152231 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12066.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Blecher G et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Blecher, Gideon Almekaty, Khaled Kalejaiye, Odunayo Minhas, Suks Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title | Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title_full | Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title_fullStr | Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title_short | Does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
title_sort | does penile rehabilitation have a role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152231 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12066.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blechergideon doespenilerehabilitationhavearoleinthetreatmentoferectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomy AT almekatykhaled doespenilerehabilitationhavearoleinthetreatmentoferectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomy AT kalejaiyeodunayo doespenilerehabilitationhavearoleinthetreatmentoferectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomy AT minhassuks doespenilerehabilitationhavearoleinthetreatmentoferectiledysfunctionfollowingradicalprostatectomy |