Cargando…

“ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures

Background: People with non-epileptic seizures (NES) describe challenging relationships with health professionals, and explain negative interactions as common and expected. Despite these difficulties, little is known about how people with NES experience difficult healthcare encounters. Methods: Usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robson, Catherine, Lian, Olaug S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152594
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12133.2
_version_ 1783275100810772480
author Robson, Catherine
Lian, Olaug S.
author_facet Robson, Catherine
Lian, Olaug S.
author_sort Robson, Catherine
collection PubMed
description Background: People with non-epileptic seizures (NES) describe challenging relationships with health professionals, and explain negative interactions as common and expected. Despite these difficulties, little is known about how people with NES experience difficult healthcare encounters. Methods: Using a thematic discourse analysis approach, we analysed the free-text survey responses of 135 people with NES and asked: what kind of challenges do people living with this condition encounter when interacting with health professionals, and how do they experience the consequences of difficult interactions? We explore their experiences by interpreting the latent meaning of participants’ texts from a social-constructionist perspective on health and illness. Results: The overarching narrative depicts a fundamental breakdown in patient-provider relationships. According to our data, the negative experiences of study participants emerge from more than practitioners’ lack of awareness of NES and access to information about the condition - to the extent that it is available. In examining the challenges people with NES encounter when interacting with health professionals, their main experiences centre on blame and humiliation. When exploring their experiences, theories of stigma serve as a useful theoretical framework. Conclusions: Normative judgements arising from psychogenic understandings of NES are stigmatising and restrict professional displays of respectful (patient-centred) care. Those with the condition depict being negatively stereotyped, illegitimated and held morally culpable by health professionals. Perceived to lack medical, moral and credible status, participants describe practitioners who treat them with disrespect, and some recount conduct that defies all ethical and professional obligations and standards. These encounters can have wide-ranging adverse consequences for patients: emotionally, physically, and for their future healthcare. The quality of healthcare interactions for people with NES requires urgent improvements. In addition to increased awareness of the condition, practitioners need to be conscious of making and acting on adverse moral appraisals when interacting with this patient group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5664997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56649972017-11-17 “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures Robson, Catherine Lian, Olaug S. Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: People with non-epileptic seizures (NES) describe challenging relationships with health professionals, and explain negative interactions as common and expected. Despite these difficulties, little is known about how people with NES experience difficult healthcare encounters. Methods: Using a thematic discourse analysis approach, we analysed the free-text survey responses of 135 people with NES and asked: what kind of challenges do people living with this condition encounter when interacting with health professionals, and how do they experience the consequences of difficult interactions? We explore their experiences by interpreting the latent meaning of participants’ texts from a social-constructionist perspective on health and illness. Results: The overarching narrative depicts a fundamental breakdown in patient-provider relationships. According to our data, the negative experiences of study participants emerge from more than practitioners’ lack of awareness of NES and access to information about the condition - to the extent that it is available. In examining the challenges people with NES encounter when interacting with health professionals, their main experiences centre on blame and humiliation. When exploring their experiences, theories of stigma serve as a useful theoretical framework. Conclusions: Normative judgements arising from psychogenic understandings of NES are stigmatising and restrict professional displays of respectful (patient-centred) care. Those with the condition depict being negatively stereotyped, illegitimated and held morally culpable by health professionals. Perceived to lack medical, moral and credible status, participants describe practitioners who treat them with disrespect, and some recount conduct that defies all ethical and professional obligations and standards. These encounters can have wide-ranging adverse consequences for patients: emotionally, physically, and for their future healthcare. The quality of healthcare interactions for people with NES requires urgent improvements. In addition to increased awareness of the condition, practitioners need to be conscious of making and acting on adverse moral appraisals when interacting with this patient group. F1000 Research Limited 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5664997/ /pubmed/29152594 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12133.2 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Robson C and Lian OS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robson, Catherine
Lian, Olaug S.
“ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title_full “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title_fullStr “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title_full_unstemmed “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title_short “ Blaming, shaming, humiliation”: Stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
title_sort “ blaming, shaming, humiliation”: stigmatising medical interactions among people with non-epileptic seizures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5664997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152594
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12133.2
work_keys_str_mv AT robsoncatherine blamingshaminghumiliationstigmatisingmedicalinteractionsamongpeoplewithnonepilepticseizures
AT lianolaugs blamingshaminghumiliationstigmatisingmedicalinteractionsamongpeoplewithnonepilepticseizures