Cargando…

Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures

Prostate cancer is a leading male malignancy worldwide, while the prognosis prediction remains quite inaccurate. The study aimed to observe whether there was an association between the prognosis of prostate cancer and genetic mutation profile, and to build an accurate prognostic predictor based on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shengping, Xu, Yafei, Hui, Xinjie, Yang, Fei, Hu, Yueming, Shao, Jianlin, Liang, Hui, Wang, Yejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158798
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21261
_version_ 1783275108125638656
author Zhang, Shengping
Xu, Yafei
Hui, Xinjie
Yang, Fei
Hu, Yueming
Shao, Jianlin
Liang, Hui
Wang, Yejun
author_facet Zhang, Shengping
Xu, Yafei
Hui, Xinjie
Yang, Fei
Hu, Yueming
Shao, Jianlin
Liang, Hui
Wang, Yejun
author_sort Zhang, Shengping
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer is a leading male malignancy worldwide, while the prognosis prediction remains quite inaccurate. The study aimed to observe whether there was an association between the prognosis of prostate cancer and genetic mutation profile, and to build an accurate prognostic predictor based on the genetic signatures. The patients diagnosed of prostate cancer from The Cancer Genomic Atlas were used for prognostic stratification, while the somatic gene mutation profiles were compared between different prognostic groups. The genetic features were further used for training machine-learning models to predict prostate cancer prognosis. No significant gene with somatic mutation rate difference was found between prognostic groups of prostate cancer. Total 43 atypical genes were screened for building a support vector machine model to predict prostate cancer prognosis, with an average accuracy of 66% and 64% for 5-fold cross-validation or training-testing evaluation respectively. When combined with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) features, the model could be further improved, with the 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of ~71%, much better than NICE itself (62%). To our knowledge, for the first time, the research studied the relationship of genome-wide somatic mutations with prostate prognosis, and developed an effective prognostic prediction model with the atypical genetic signatures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56650422017-11-20 Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures Zhang, Shengping Xu, Yafei Hui, Xinjie Yang, Fei Hu, Yueming Shao, Jianlin Liang, Hui Wang, Yejun J Cancer Research Paper Prostate cancer is a leading male malignancy worldwide, while the prognosis prediction remains quite inaccurate. The study aimed to observe whether there was an association between the prognosis of prostate cancer and genetic mutation profile, and to build an accurate prognostic predictor based on the genetic signatures. The patients diagnosed of prostate cancer from The Cancer Genomic Atlas were used for prognostic stratification, while the somatic gene mutation profiles were compared between different prognostic groups. The genetic features were further used for training machine-learning models to predict prostate cancer prognosis. No significant gene with somatic mutation rate difference was found between prognostic groups of prostate cancer. Total 43 atypical genes were screened for building a support vector machine model to predict prostate cancer prognosis, with an average accuracy of 66% and 64% for 5-fold cross-validation or training-testing evaluation respectively. When combined with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) features, the model could be further improved, with the 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of ~71%, much better than NICE itself (62%). To our knowledge, for the first time, the research studied the relationship of genome-wide somatic mutations with prostate prognosis, and developed an effective prognostic prediction model with the atypical genetic signatures. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5665042/ /pubmed/29158798 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21261 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zhang, Shengping
Xu, Yafei
Hui, Xinjie
Yang, Fei
Hu, Yueming
Shao, Jianlin
Liang, Hui
Wang, Yejun
Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title_full Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title_fullStr Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title_full_unstemmed Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title_short Improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
title_sort improvement in prediction of prostate cancer prognosis with somatic mutational signatures
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158798
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.21261
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshengping improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT xuyafei improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT huixinjie improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT yangfei improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT huyueming improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT shaojianlin improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT lianghui improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures
AT wangyejun improvementinpredictionofprostatecancerprognosiswithsomaticmutationalsignatures