Cargando…

Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to explore the potential sources of variation and understand the meaning of safety climate for nursing practice in acute hospital settings in the UK. DESIGN: A sequential mixed methods design included a cross-sectional survey using the Safety Climate Questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarling, Maggie, Jones, Anne, Murrells, Trevor, McCutcheon, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016977
_version_ 1783275124538998784
author Tarling, Maggie
Jones, Anne
Murrells, Trevor
McCutcheon, Helen
author_facet Tarling, Maggie
Jones, Anne
Murrells, Trevor
McCutcheon, Helen
author_sort Tarling, Maggie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to explore the potential sources of variation and understand the meaning of safety climate for nursing practice in acute hospital settings in the UK. DESIGN: A sequential mixed methods design included a cross-sectional survey using the Safety Climate Questionnaire (SCQ) and thematic analysis of focus group discussions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the factor structure of the SCQ. Factor scores were compared between nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas. Results from the survey and the thematic analysis were then compared and synthesised. SETTING: A London University. PARTICIPANTS: 319 registered nurses working in acute hospital settings completed the SCQ and a further 23 nurses participated in focus groups. RESULTS: CFA indicated that there was a good model fit on some criteria (χ(2)=1683.699, df=824, p<0.001; χ(2)/df=2.04; root mean square error of approximation=0.058) but a less acceptable fit on comparative fit index which is 0.804. There was a statistically significant difference between clinical specialisms in management commitment (F (4,266)=4.66, p=0.001). Nurses working in operating theatres had lower scores compared with ward areas and they also reported negative perceptions about management in their focus group. There was significant variation in scores for communication across clinical specialism (F (4,266)=2.62, p=0.035) but none of the pairwise comparisons achieved statistical significance. Thematic analysis identified themes of human factors, clinical management and protecting patients. The system and the human side of caring was identified as a meta-theme. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the SCQ has some utility but requires further exploration. The findings indicate that safety in nursing practice is a complex interaction between safety systems and the social and interpersonal aspects of clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56652292017-11-15 Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study Tarling, Maggie Jones, Anne Murrells, Trevor McCutcheon, Helen BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to explore the potential sources of variation and understand the meaning of safety climate for nursing practice in acute hospital settings in the UK. DESIGN: A sequential mixed methods design included a cross-sectional survey using the Safety Climate Questionnaire (SCQ) and thematic analysis of focus group discussions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the factor structure of the SCQ. Factor scores were compared between nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas. Results from the survey and the thematic analysis were then compared and synthesised. SETTING: A London University. PARTICIPANTS: 319 registered nurses working in acute hospital settings completed the SCQ and a further 23 nurses participated in focus groups. RESULTS: CFA indicated that there was a good model fit on some criteria (χ(2)=1683.699, df=824, p<0.001; χ(2)/df=2.04; root mean square error of approximation=0.058) but a less acceptable fit on comparative fit index which is 0.804. There was a statistically significant difference between clinical specialisms in management commitment (F (4,266)=4.66, p=0.001). Nurses working in operating theatres had lower scores compared with ward areas and they also reported negative perceptions about management in their focus group. There was significant variation in scores for communication across clinical specialism (F (4,266)=2.62, p=0.035) but none of the pairwise comparisons achieved statistical significance. Thematic analysis identified themes of human factors, clinical management and protecting patients. The system and the human side of caring was identified as a meta-theme. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the SCQ has some utility but requires further exploration. The findings indicate that safety in nursing practice is a complex interaction between safety systems and the social and interpersonal aspects of clinical practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5665229/ /pubmed/29084793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016977 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Tarling, Maggie
Jones, Anne
Murrells, Trevor
McCutcheon, Helen
Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_short Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_sort comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the uk: a mixed methods study
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016977
work_keys_str_mv AT tarlingmaggie comparingsafetyclimatefornursesworkinginoperatingtheatrescriticalcareandwardareasintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT jonesanne comparingsafetyclimatefornursesworkinginoperatingtheatrescriticalcareandwardareasintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT murrellstrevor comparingsafetyclimatefornursesworkinginoperatingtheatrescriticalcareandwardareasintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT mccutcheonhelen comparingsafetyclimatefornursesworkinginoperatingtheatrescriticalcareandwardareasintheukamixedmethodsstudy