Cargando…

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders and shows favourable clinical results. Recently, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has become a new trajectory for screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Several biomech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Zhenhua, Li, Xiaobin, Tang, Qian, Wang, Chenggui, Zheng, Wenhao, Zhang, Hui, Wu, Ai-Min, Tian, Naifeng, Wu, Yaosen, Ni, Wenfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017227
_version_ 1783275129753567232
author Feng, Zhenhua
Li, Xiaobin
Tang, Qian
Wang, Chenggui
Zheng, Wenhao
Zhang, Hui
Wu, Ai-Min
Tian, Naifeng
Wu, Yaosen
Ni, Wenfei
author_facet Feng, Zhenhua
Li, Xiaobin
Tang, Qian
Wang, Chenggui
Zheng, Wenhao
Zhang, Hui
Wu, Ai-Min
Tian, Naifeng
Wu, Yaosen
Ni, Wenfei
author_sort Feng, Zhenhua
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders and shows favourable clinical results. Recently, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has become a new trajectory for screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the CBT technique achieves screw purchase and strength greater than the traditional method. Currently, the available data on the clinical effectiveness of the two performed surgeries, TLIF with CBT screws (CBT-TLIF) and TLIF with traditional pedicle screws (PS-TLIF), are insufficient. This is the first randomised study to compare CBT-TLIF against traditional PS fixation and will provide recommendations for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A blinded randomised controlled trial (blinding for the patient and statistician, rather than for the clinician and researcher) will be conducted. A total of 254 participants with lumbar disc degenerative disease who are candidates for TLIF surgery will be randomly allocated to either the CBT-TLIF group or the PS-TLIF group at a ratio of 1:1. The primary clinical outcome measures are the incidence of adjacent cranial facet joint violation, fusion rate and the screw loosening rate. Secondary clinical outcome measures are Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of back pain, VAS of leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications. These parameters will be evaluated on day 3, and then at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (batch: 2017–03). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and an international spine-related meeting after completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03105167; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56652622017-11-15 Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial Feng, Zhenhua Li, Xiaobin Tang, Qian Wang, Chenggui Zheng, Wenhao Zhang, Hui Wu, Ai-Min Tian, Naifeng Wu, Yaosen Ni, Wenfei BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders and shows favourable clinical results. Recently, cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has become a new trajectory for screw insertion in the lumbar spine. Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the CBT technique achieves screw purchase and strength greater than the traditional method. Currently, the available data on the clinical effectiveness of the two performed surgeries, TLIF with CBT screws (CBT-TLIF) and TLIF with traditional pedicle screws (PS-TLIF), are insufficient. This is the first randomised study to compare CBT-TLIF against traditional PS fixation and will provide recommendations for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disorders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A blinded randomised controlled trial (blinding for the patient and statistician, rather than for the clinician and researcher) will be conducted. A total of 254 participants with lumbar disc degenerative disease who are candidates for TLIF surgery will be randomly allocated to either the CBT-TLIF group or the PS-TLIF group at a ratio of 1:1. The primary clinical outcome measures are the incidence of adjacent cranial facet joint violation, fusion rate and the screw loosening rate. Secondary clinical outcome measures are Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of back pain, VAS of leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications. These parameters will be evaluated on day 3, and then at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (batch: 2017–03). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and an international spine-related meeting after completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03105167; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5665262/ /pubmed/29061616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017227 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Feng, Zhenhua
Li, Xiaobin
Tang, Qian
Wang, Chenggui
Zheng, Wenhao
Zhang, Hui
Wu, Ai-Min
Tian, Naifeng
Wu, Yaosen
Ni, Wenfei
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title_full Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title_short Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
title_sort transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017227
work_keys_str_mv AT fengzhenhua transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lixiaobin transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tangqian transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangchenggui transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhengwenhao transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhanghui transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wuaimin transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tiannaifeng transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wuyaosen transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT niwenfei transforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithcorticalbonetrajectoryscrewsversustraditionalpediclescrewsfixationastudyprotocolofrandomisedcontrolledtrial