Cargando…

The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry

Geometry correction is traditionally plagued by mis-fitting of correlated parameters, leading to local minima which prevent further improvements. Segmented detectors pose an enhanced risk of mis-fitting: even a minor confusion of detector distance and panel separation can prevent improvement in data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginn, Helen Mary, Stuart, David Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29091058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517013327
_version_ 1783275135011127296
author Ginn, Helen Mary
Stuart, David Ian
author_facet Ginn, Helen Mary
Stuart, David Ian
author_sort Ginn, Helen Mary
collection PubMed
description Geometry correction is traditionally plagued by mis-fitting of correlated parameters, leading to local minima which prevent further improvements. Segmented detectors pose an enhanced risk of mis-fitting: even a minor confusion of detector distance and panel separation can prevent improvement in data quality. The slip-and-slide algorithm breaks down effects of the correlated parameters and their associated target functions in a fundamental shift in the approach to the problem. Parameters are never refined against the components of the data to which they are insensitive, providing a dramatic boost in the exploitation of information from a very small number of diffraction patterns. This algorithm can be applied to exploit the adherence of the spot-finding results prior to indexing to a given lattice using unit-cell dimensions as a restraint. Alternatively, it can be applied to the predicted spot locations and the observed reflection positions after indexing from a smaller number of images. Thus, the indexing rate can be boosted by 5.8% using geometry refinement from only 125 indexed patterns or 500 unindexed patterns. In one example of cypovirus type 17 polyhedrin diffraction at the Linac Coherent Light Source, this geometry refinement reveals a detector tilt of 0.3° (resulting in a maximal Z-axis error of ∼0.5 mm from an average detector distance of ∼90 mm) whilst treating all panels independently. Re-indexing and integrating with updated detector geometry reduces systematic errors providing a boost in anomalous signal of sulfur atoms by 20%. Due to the refinement of decoupled parameters, this geometry method also reaches convergence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56652942017-11-09 The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry Ginn, Helen Mary Stuart, David Ian J Synchrotron Radiat Research Papers Geometry correction is traditionally plagued by mis-fitting of correlated parameters, leading to local minima which prevent further improvements. Segmented detectors pose an enhanced risk of mis-fitting: even a minor confusion of detector distance and panel separation can prevent improvement in data quality. The slip-and-slide algorithm breaks down effects of the correlated parameters and their associated target functions in a fundamental shift in the approach to the problem. Parameters are never refined against the components of the data to which they are insensitive, providing a dramatic boost in the exploitation of information from a very small number of diffraction patterns. This algorithm can be applied to exploit the adherence of the spot-finding results prior to indexing to a given lattice using unit-cell dimensions as a restraint. Alternatively, it can be applied to the predicted spot locations and the observed reflection positions after indexing from a smaller number of images. Thus, the indexing rate can be boosted by 5.8% using geometry refinement from only 125 indexed patterns or 500 unindexed patterns. In one example of cypovirus type 17 polyhedrin diffraction at the Linac Coherent Light Source, this geometry refinement reveals a detector tilt of 0.3° (resulting in a maximal Z-axis error of ∼0.5 mm from an average detector distance of ∼90 mm) whilst treating all panels independently. Re-indexing and integrating with updated detector geometry reduces systematic errors providing a boost in anomalous signal of sulfur atoms by 20%. Due to the refinement of decoupled parameters, this geometry method also reaches convergence. International Union of Crystallography 2017-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5665294/ /pubmed/29091058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517013327 Text en © Ginn and Stuart 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/
spellingShingle Research Papers
Ginn, Helen Mary
Stuart, David Ian
The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title_full The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title_fullStr The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title_full_unstemmed The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title_short The slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
title_sort slip-and-slide algorithm: a refinement protocol for detector geometry
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29091058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517013327
work_keys_str_mv AT ginnhelenmary theslipandslidealgorithmarefinementprotocolfordetectorgeometry
AT stuartdavidian theslipandslidealgorithmarefinementprotocolfordetectorgeometry
AT ginnhelenmary slipandslidealgorithmarefinementprotocolfordetectorgeometry
AT stuartdavidian slipandslidealgorithmarefinementprotocolfordetectorgeometry