Cargando…

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement

INTRODUCTION: The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement was developed in response to inadequate reporting of observational studies. In recent years, several extensions to STROBE have been created to provide more nuanced field-specific guidance for au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sharp, Melissa K, Utrobičić, Ana, Gómez, Guadalupe, Cobo, Erik, Wager, Elizabeth, Hren, Darko
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019043

Ejemplares similares

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The STROBE Extensions: Considerations for Development
por: Sharp, Melissa K., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions for early phase dose-finding clinical trials: the DEFINE (DosE-FIndiNg Extensions) study protocol
por: Espinasse, Aude, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Gattrell, William T, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)
por: Imran, Mahrukh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
por: Kojima, Takako, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Data sharing through an NIH central database repository: a cross-sectional survey of BioLINCC users
por: Ross, Joseph S, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting quality of abstracts of trials published in top five pain journals: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Sriganesh, Kamath, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
por: Miranda, Jessica Steffany, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Scientific research output in orthopaedics from China and other top-ranking countries: a 10-year survey of the literature
por: Zou, Yuming, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Survey of quality and clarity of methods and results reporting in 1 year of intervention studies published in high-impact medical and psychiatric journals
por: Ravichandran, Caitlin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
por: Gill, Christopher J
Publicado: (2012)

Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional study
por: Earley, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
por: Stretton, Serina
Publicado: (2014)

How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
por: Kicinski, Michal
Publicado: (2014)

Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
por: Nagendran, Myura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study
por: van den Bogert, Cornelis A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
por: Lieb, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study
por: Slade, Susan C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_cq1ch1nc9bbhv40fmm59ruda5o