Cargando…

Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether respondents to a survey of health and physical activity and potential determinants could be grouped according to the questions they missed, known as ‘item missing’. DESIGN: Observational study of longitudinal data. SETTING: Residents of Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Adrian G, McElwee, Paul, Nathan, Andrea, Burton, Nicola W, Turrell, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017284
_version_ 1783275137407123456
author Barnett, Adrian G
McElwee, Paul
Nathan, Andrea
Burton, Nicola W
Turrell, Gavin
author_facet Barnett, Adrian G
McElwee, Paul
Nathan, Andrea
Burton, Nicola W
Turrell, Gavin
author_sort Barnett, Adrian G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine whether respondents to a survey of health and physical activity and potential determinants could be grouped according to the questions they missed, known as ‘item missing’. DESIGN: Observational study of longitudinal data. SETTING: Residents of Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 6901 people aged 40–65 years in 2007. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a latent class model with a mixture of multinomial distributions and chose the number of classes using the Bayesian information criterion. We used logistic regression to examine if participants’ characteristics were associated with their modal latent class. We used logistic regression to examine whether the amount of item missing in a survey predicted wave missing in the following survey. RESULTS: Four per cent of participants missed almost one-fifth of the questions, and this group missed more questions in the middle of the survey. Eighty-three per cent of participants completed almost every question, but had a relatively high missing probability for a question on sleep time, a question which had an inconsistent presentation compared with the rest of the survey. Participants who completed almost every question were generally younger and more educated. Participants who completed more questions were less likely to miss the next longitudinal wave. CONCLUSIONS: Examining patterns in item missing data has improved our understanding of how missing data were generated and has informed future survey design to help reduce missing data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56653042017-11-15 Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study Barnett, Adrian G McElwee, Paul Nathan, Andrea Burton, Nicola W Turrell, Gavin BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To examine whether respondents to a survey of health and physical activity and potential determinants could be grouped according to the questions they missed, known as ‘item missing’. DESIGN: Observational study of longitudinal data. SETTING: Residents of Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 6901 people aged 40–65 years in 2007. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a latent class model with a mixture of multinomial distributions and chose the number of classes using the Bayesian information criterion. We used logistic regression to examine if participants’ characteristics were associated with their modal latent class. We used logistic regression to examine whether the amount of item missing in a survey predicted wave missing in the following survey. RESULTS: Four per cent of participants missed almost one-fifth of the questions, and this group missed more questions in the middle of the survey. Eighty-three per cent of participants completed almost every question, but had a relatively high missing probability for a question on sleep time, a question which had an inconsistent presentation compared with the rest of the survey. Participants who completed almost every question were generally younger and more educated. Participants who completed more questions were less likely to miss the next longitudinal wave. CONCLUSIONS: Examining patterns in item missing data has improved our understanding of how missing data were generated and has informed future survey design to help reduce missing data. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5665304/ /pubmed/29084795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017284 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Barnett, Adrian G
McElwee, Paul
Nathan, Andrea
Burton, Nicola W
Turrell, Gavin
Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title_full Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title_fullStr Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title_short Identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
title_sort identifying patterns of item missing survey data using latent groups: an observational study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29084795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017284
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettadriang identifyingpatternsofitemmissingsurveydatausinglatentgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT mcelweepaul identifyingpatternsofitemmissingsurveydatausinglatentgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT nathanandrea identifyingpatternsofitemmissingsurveydatausinglatentgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT burtonnicolaw identifyingpatternsofitemmissingsurveydatausinglatentgroupsanobservationalstudy
AT turrellgavin identifyingpatternsofitemmissingsurveydatausinglatentgroupsanobservationalstudy