Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide assessment and intensive home treatment in a crisis, aiming to offer an alternative for people who would otherwise require a psychiatric inpatient admission. They are available in most areas in England. Despite some evidence for their clinical and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Sonia, Mason, Oliver, Osborn, David, Milton, Alyssa, Henderson, Claire, Marston, Louise, Ambler, Gareth, Hunter, Rachael, Pilling, Stephen, Morant, Nicola, Gray, Richard, Weaver, Tim, Nolan, Fiona, Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015665
_version_ 1783275138649686016
author Johnson, Sonia
Mason, Oliver
Osborn, David
Milton, Alyssa
Henderson, Claire
Marston, Louise
Ambler, Gareth
Hunter, Rachael
Pilling, Stephen
Morant, Nicola
Gray, Richard
Weaver, Tim
Nolan, Fiona
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
author_facet Johnson, Sonia
Mason, Oliver
Osborn, David
Milton, Alyssa
Henderson, Claire
Marston, Louise
Ambler, Gareth
Hunter, Rachael
Pilling, Stephen
Morant, Nicola
Gray, Richard
Weaver, Tim
Nolan, Fiona
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
author_sort Johnson, Sonia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide assessment and intensive home treatment in a crisis, aiming to offer an alternative for people who would otherwise require a psychiatric inpatient admission. They are available in most areas in England. Despite some evidence for their clinical and cost-effectiveness, recurrent concerns are expressed regarding discontinuity with other services and lack of focus on preventing future relapse and readmission to acute care. Currently evidence on how to prevent readmissions to acute care is limited. Self-management interventions, involving supporting service users in recognising and managing signs of their own illness and in actively planning their recovery, have some supporting evidence, but have not been tested as a means of preventing readmission to acute care in people leaving community crisis care. We thus proposed the current study to test the effectiveness of such an intervention. We selected peer support workers as the preferred staff to deliver such an intervention, as they are well-placed to model and encourage active and autonomous recovery from mental health problems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CORE (CRT Optimisation and Relapse Prevention) self-management trial compares the effectiveness of a peer-provided self-management intervention for people leaving CRT care, with treatment as usual supplemented by a booklet on self-management. The planned sample is 440 participants, including 40 participants in an internal pilot. The primary outcome measure is whether participants are readmitted to acute care over 1 year of follow-up following entry to the trial. Secondary outcomes include self-rated recovery at 4 and at 18 months following trial entry, measured using the Questionnaire on the Process of Recovery. Analysis will follow an intention to treatment principle. Random effects logistic regression modelling with adjustment for clustering by peer support worker will be used to test the primary hypothesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CORE self-management trial was approved by the London Camden and Islington Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 12/LO/0988). A Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee oversee the progress of the study. We will report on the results of the clinical trial, as well as on the characteristics of the participants and their associations with relapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 01027104;pre-results stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56653092017-11-15 Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol Johnson, Sonia Mason, Oliver Osborn, David Milton, Alyssa Henderson, Claire Marston, Louise Ambler, Gareth Hunter, Rachael Pilling, Stephen Morant, Nicola Gray, Richard Weaver, Tim Nolan, Fiona Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide assessment and intensive home treatment in a crisis, aiming to offer an alternative for people who would otherwise require a psychiatric inpatient admission. They are available in most areas in England. Despite some evidence for their clinical and cost-effectiveness, recurrent concerns are expressed regarding discontinuity with other services and lack of focus on preventing future relapse and readmission to acute care. Currently evidence on how to prevent readmissions to acute care is limited. Self-management interventions, involving supporting service users in recognising and managing signs of their own illness and in actively planning their recovery, have some supporting evidence, but have not been tested as a means of preventing readmission to acute care in people leaving community crisis care. We thus proposed the current study to test the effectiveness of such an intervention. We selected peer support workers as the preferred staff to deliver such an intervention, as they are well-placed to model and encourage active and autonomous recovery from mental health problems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CORE (CRT Optimisation and Relapse Prevention) self-management trial compares the effectiveness of a peer-provided self-management intervention for people leaving CRT care, with treatment as usual supplemented by a booklet on self-management. The planned sample is 440 participants, including 40 participants in an internal pilot. The primary outcome measure is whether participants are readmitted to acute care over 1 year of follow-up following entry to the trial. Secondary outcomes include self-rated recovery at 4 and at 18 months following trial entry, measured using the Questionnaire on the Process of Recovery. Analysis will follow an intention to treatment principle. Random effects logistic regression modelling with adjustment for clustering by peer support worker will be used to test the primary hypothesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CORE self-management trial was approved by the London Camden and Islington Research Ethics Committee (REC ref: 12/LO/0988). A Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee oversee the progress of the study. We will report on the results of the clinical trial, as well as on the characteristics of the participants and their associations with relapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 01027104;pre-results stage. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5665309/ /pubmed/29079602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015665 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Johnson, Sonia
Mason, Oliver
Osborn, David
Milton, Alyssa
Henderson, Claire
Marston, Louise
Ambler, Gareth
Hunter, Rachael
Pilling, Stephen
Morant, Nicola
Gray, Richard
Weaver, Tim
Nolan, Fiona
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title_full Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title_short Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
title_sort randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015665
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonsonia randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT masonoliver randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT osborndavid randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT miltonalyssa randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT hendersonclaire randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT marstonlouise randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT amblergareth randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT hunterrachael randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT pillingstephen randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT morantnicola randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT grayrichard randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT weavertim randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT nolanfiona randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol
AT lloydevansbrynmor randomisedcontrolledtrialoftheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeerdeliveredselfmanagementinterventiontopreventrelapseincrisisresolutionteamusersstudyprotocol