Cargando…
Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK
OBJECTIVE: To map out the current provision of interventional oncology (IO) services in the UK. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre study. SETTING: All National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England and Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland health boards. PARTICIPANTS: Interventional radiology (IR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016631 |
_version_ | 1783275138895052800 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Jim Atiiga, Peter Alcorn, Des J Kay, David Illing, Rowland Breen, David J Railton, Nicholas McCafferty, Ian J Haslam, Philip J Wah, Tze Min |
author_facet | Zhong, Jim Atiiga, Peter Alcorn, Des J Kay, David Illing, Rowland Breen, David J Railton, Nicholas McCafferty, Ian J Haslam, Philip J Wah, Tze Min |
author_sort | Zhong, Jim |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To map out the current provision of interventional oncology (IO) services in the UK. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre study. SETTING: All National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England and Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland health boards. PARTICIPANTS: Interventional radiology (IR) departments in all NHS trusts/health boards in the UK. RESULTS: A total of 179 NHS trusts/health boards were contacted. We received a 100% response rate. Only 19 (11%) institutions had an IO lead. 144 trusts (80%) provided IO services or had a formal pathway of referral in place for patients to a recipient trust. 21 trusts (12%) had plans to provide an IO service or formal referral pathway in the next 12 months only. 14 trusts (8%) did not have a pathway of referral and no plans to implement one. 70 trusts (39%) offered supportive and disease-modifying procedures. One trust had a formal referral pathway for supportive procedures. 73 trusts (41%) provided only supportive procedures (diagnostic or therapeutic). Of these, 43 (59%) had a referral pathway for disease-modifying IO procedures, either from a regional cancer network or through IR networks and 30 trusts (41%) did not have a referral pathway for disease-modifying procedures. CONCLUSION: The provision of IO services in the UK is promising; however, collaborative networks are necessary to ensure disease-modifying IO procedures are made accessible to all patients and to facilitate larger registry data for research with commissioning of new services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5665310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56653102017-11-15 Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK Zhong, Jim Atiiga, Peter Alcorn, Des J Kay, David Illing, Rowland Breen, David J Railton, Nicholas McCafferty, Ian J Haslam, Philip J Wah, Tze Min BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging OBJECTIVE: To map out the current provision of interventional oncology (IO) services in the UK. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre study. SETTING: All National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England and Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland health boards. PARTICIPANTS: Interventional radiology (IR) departments in all NHS trusts/health boards in the UK. RESULTS: A total of 179 NHS trusts/health boards were contacted. We received a 100% response rate. Only 19 (11%) institutions had an IO lead. 144 trusts (80%) provided IO services or had a formal pathway of referral in place for patients to a recipient trust. 21 trusts (12%) had plans to provide an IO service or formal referral pathway in the next 12 months only. 14 trusts (8%) did not have a pathway of referral and no plans to implement one. 70 trusts (39%) offered supportive and disease-modifying procedures. One trust had a formal referral pathway for supportive procedures. 73 trusts (41%) provided only supportive procedures (diagnostic or therapeutic). Of these, 43 (59%) had a referral pathway for disease-modifying IO procedures, either from a regional cancer network or through IR networks and 30 trusts (41%) did not have a referral pathway for disease-modifying procedures. CONCLUSION: The provision of IO services in the UK is promising; however, collaborative networks are necessary to ensure disease-modifying IO procedures are made accessible to all patients and to facilitate larger registry data for research with commissioning of new services. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5665310/ /pubmed/29061610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016631 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Zhong, Jim Atiiga, Peter Alcorn, Des J Kay, David Illing, Rowland Breen, David J Railton, Nicholas McCafferty, Ian J Haslam, Philip J Wah, Tze Min Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title | Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title_full | Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title_fullStr | Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title_short | Cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the UK |
title_sort | cross-sectional study of the provision of interventional oncology services in the uk |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29061610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongjim crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT atiigapeter crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT alcorndesj crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT kaydavid crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT illingrowland crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT breendavidj crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT railtonnicholas crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT mccaffertyianj crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT haslamphilipj crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk AT wahtzemin crosssectionalstudyoftheprovisionofinterventionaloncologyservicesintheuk |