Cargando…

Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite

Among asbestos minerals, fibrous riebeckite (crocidolite) and tremolite share the amphibole structure but largely differ in terms of their iron content and oxidation state. In asbestos toxicology, iron-generated free radicals are largely held as one of the causes of asbestos malignant effect. With t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreozzi, Giovanni B., Pacella, Alessandro, Corazzari, Ingrid, Tomatis, Maura, Turci, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14480-z
_version_ 1783275224324636672
author Andreozzi, Giovanni B.
Pacella, Alessandro
Corazzari, Ingrid
Tomatis, Maura
Turci, Francesco
author_facet Andreozzi, Giovanni B.
Pacella, Alessandro
Corazzari, Ingrid
Tomatis, Maura
Turci, Francesco
author_sort Andreozzi, Giovanni B.
collection PubMed
description Among asbestos minerals, fibrous riebeckite (crocidolite) and tremolite share the amphibole structure but largely differ in terms of their iron content and oxidation state. In asbestos toxicology, iron-generated free radicals are largely held as one of the causes of asbestos malignant effect. With the aim of clarifying i) the relationship between Fe occurrence and asbestos surface reactivity, and ii) how free-radical generation is modulated by surface modifications of the minerals, UICC crocidolite and fibrous tremolite from Maryland were leached from 1 day to 1 month in an oxidative medium buffered at pH 7.4 to induce redox alterations and surface rearrangements that may occur in body fluids. Structural and chemical modifications and free radical generation were monitored by HR-TEM/EDS and spin trapping/EPR spectroscopy, respectively. Free radical yield resulted to be dependent on few specific Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) surface sites rather than total Fe content. The evolution of reactivity with time highlighted that low-coordinated Fe ions primarily contribute to the overall reactivity of the fibre. Current findings contribute to explain the causes of the severe asbestos-induced oxidative stress at molecular level also for iron-poor amphiboles, and demonstrate that asbestos have a sustained surface radical activity even when highly altered by oxidative leaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56659742017-11-08 Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite Andreozzi, Giovanni B. Pacella, Alessandro Corazzari, Ingrid Tomatis, Maura Turci, Francesco Sci Rep Article Among asbestos minerals, fibrous riebeckite (crocidolite) and tremolite share the amphibole structure but largely differ in terms of their iron content and oxidation state. In asbestos toxicology, iron-generated free radicals are largely held as one of the causes of asbestos malignant effect. With the aim of clarifying i) the relationship between Fe occurrence and asbestos surface reactivity, and ii) how free-radical generation is modulated by surface modifications of the minerals, UICC crocidolite and fibrous tremolite from Maryland were leached from 1 day to 1 month in an oxidative medium buffered at pH 7.4 to induce redox alterations and surface rearrangements that may occur in body fluids. Structural and chemical modifications and free radical generation were monitored by HR-TEM/EDS and spin trapping/EPR spectroscopy, respectively. Free radical yield resulted to be dependent on few specific Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) surface sites rather than total Fe content. The evolution of reactivity with time highlighted that low-coordinated Fe ions primarily contribute to the overall reactivity of the fibre. Current findings contribute to explain the causes of the severe asbestos-induced oxidative stress at molecular level also for iron-poor amphiboles, and demonstrate that asbestos have a sustained surface radical activity even when highly altered by oxidative leaching. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5665974/ /pubmed/29089634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14480-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Andreozzi, Giovanni B.
Pacella, Alessandro
Corazzari, Ingrid
Tomatis, Maura
Turci, Francesco
Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title_full Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title_fullStr Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title_full_unstemmed Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title_short Surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
title_sort surface reactivity of amphibole asbestos: a comparison between crocidolite and tremolite
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29089634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14480-z
work_keys_str_mv AT andreozzigiovannib surfacereactivityofamphiboleasbestosacomparisonbetweencrocidoliteandtremolite
AT pacellaalessandro surfacereactivityofamphiboleasbestosacomparisonbetweencrocidoliteandtremolite
AT corazzariingrid surfacereactivityofamphiboleasbestosacomparisonbetweencrocidoliteandtremolite
AT tomatismaura surfacereactivityofamphiboleasbestosacomparisonbetweencrocidoliteandtremolite
AT turcifrancesco surfacereactivityofamphiboleasbestosacomparisonbetweencrocidoliteandtremolite