Cargando…
Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z |
_version_ | 1783275229572759552 |
---|---|
author | Goodwill, Alicia M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Hendy, Ashlee M. Muthalib, Makii Johnson, Liam Albein-Urios, Natalia Teo, Wei-Peng |
author_facet | Goodwill, Alicia M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Hendy, Ashlee M. Muthalib, Makii Johnson, Liam Albein-Urios, Natalia Teo, Wei-Peng |
author_sort | Goodwill, Alicia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24 rTMS and 9 TES studies (n = 33) with a sham control group were included for analyses. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Risk of Bias showed high quality (7.5/10) and low bias with included studies respectively. Our results showed an overall positive effect in favour of rTMS (SMD = 0.394, CI [0.106–0.683], p = 0.007) and TES (SMD = 0.611, CI [0.188–1.035], p = 0.005) compared with sham stimulation on motor function, with no significant differences detected between rTMS and TES (Q [1] = 0.69, p = 0.406). Neither rTMS nor TES improved cognition. No effects for stimulation parameters on motor or cognitive function were observed. To enhance the clinical utility of non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), individual prescription of stimulation parameters based upon symptomology and resting excitability state should be a priority of future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5665996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56659962017-11-08 Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Goodwill, Alicia M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Hendy, Ashlee M. Muthalib, Makii Johnson, Liam Albein-Urios, Natalia Teo, Wei-Peng Sci Rep Article Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24 rTMS and 9 TES studies (n = 33) with a sham control group were included for analyses. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Risk of Bias showed high quality (7.5/10) and low bias with included studies respectively. Our results showed an overall positive effect in favour of rTMS (SMD = 0.394, CI [0.106–0.683], p = 0.007) and TES (SMD = 0.611, CI [0.188–1.035], p = 0.005) compared with sham stimulation on motor function, with no significant differences detected between rTMS and TES (Q [1] = 0.69, p = 0.406). Neither rTMS nor TES improved cognition. No effects for stimulation parameters on motor or cognitive function were observed. To enhance the clinical utility of non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), individual prescription of stimulation parameters based upon symptomology and resting excitability state should be a priority of future research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5665996/ /pubmed/29093455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Goodwill, Alicia M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Hendy, Ashlee M. Muthalib, Makii Johnson, Liam Albein-Urios, Natalia Teo, Wei-Peng Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodwillaliciam usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lumjarradag usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hendyashleem usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muthalibmakii usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johnsonliam usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT albeinuriosnatalia usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT teoweipeng usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |