Cargando…

Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwill, Alicia M., Lum, Jarrad A. G., Hendy, Ashlee M., Muthalib, Makii, Johnson, Liam, Albein-Urios, Natalia, Teo, Wei-Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z
_version_ 1783275229572759552
author Goodwill, Alicia M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Muthalib, Makii
Johnson, Liam
Albein-Urios, Natalia
Teo, Wei-Peng
author_facet Goodwill, Alicia M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Muthalib, Makii
Johnson, Liam
Albein-Urios, Natalia
Teo, Wei-Peng
author_sort Goodwill, Alicia M.
collection PubMed
description Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24 rTMS and 9 TES studies (n = 33) with a sham control group were included for analyses. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Risk of Bias showed high quality (7.5/10) and low bias with included studies respectively. Our results showed an overall positive effect in favour of rTMS (SMD = 0.394, CI [0.106–0.683], p = 0.007) and TES (SMD = 0.611, CI [0.188–1.035], p = 0.005) compared with sham stimulation on motor function, with no significant differences detected between rTMS and TES (Q [1] = 0.69, p = 0.406). Neither rTMS nor TES improved cognition. No effects for stimulation parameters on motor or cognitive function were observed. To enhance the clinical utility of non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), individual prescription of stimulation parameters based upon symptomology and resting excitability state should be a priority of future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5665996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56659962017-11-08 Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Goodwill, Alicia M. Lum, Jarrad A. G. Hendy, Ashlee M. Muthalib, Makii Johnson, Liam Albein-Urios, Natalia Teo, Wei-Peng Sci Rep Article Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24 rTMS and 9 TES studies (n = 33) with a sham control group were included for analyses. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Risk of Bias showed high quality (7.5/10) and low bias with included studies respectively. Our results showed an overall positive effect in favour of rTMS (SMD = 0.394, CI [0.106–0.683], p = 0.007) and TES (SMD = 0.611, CI [0.188–1.035], p = 0.005) compared with sham stimulation on motor function, with no significant differences detected between rTMS and TES (Q [1] = 0.69, p = 0.406). Neither rTMS nor TES improved cognition. No effects for stimulation parameters on motor or cognitive function were observed. To enhance the clinical utility of non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), individual prescription of stimulation parameters based upon symptomology and resting excitability state should be a priority of future research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5665996/ /pubmed/29093455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Goodwill, Alicia M.
Lum, Jarrad A. G.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Muthalib, Makii
Johnson, Liam
Albein-Urios, Natalia
Teo, Wei-Peng
Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5665996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwillaliciam usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lumjarradag usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hendyashleem usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muthalibmakii usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnsonliam usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT albeinuriosnatalia usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT teoweipeng usingnoninvasivetranscranialstimulationtoimprovemotorandcognitivefunctioninparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis