Cargando…
Persistent detection of alternatively spliced BCR‐ABL variant results in a failure to achieve deep molecular response
Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) may sequentially induce TKI‐resistant BCR‐ABL mutants in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Conventional PCR monitoring of BCR‐ABL is an important indicator to determine therapeutic intervention for preventing disease progression. However, PCR cannot sepa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5666036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28801986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13353 |
Sumario: | Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) may sequentially induce TKI‐resistant BCR‐ABL mutants in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Conventional PCR monitoring of BCR‐ABL is an important indicator to determine therapeutic intervention for preventing disease progression. However, PCR cannot separately quantify amounts of BCR‐ABL and its mutants, including alternatively spliced BCR‐ABL with an insertion of 35 intronic nucleotides (BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp)) between ABL exons 8 and 9, which introduces the premature termination and loss of kinase activity. To assess the clinical impact of BCR‐ABL mutants, we performed deep sequencing analysis of BCR‐ABL transcripts of 409 samples from 37 patients with suboptimal response to frontline imatinib who were switched to nilotinib. At baseline, TKI‐resistant mutations were documented in 3 patients, whereas BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) was detected in all patients. After switching to nilotinib, both BCR‐ABL and BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) became undetectable in 3 patients who attained complete molecular response (CMR), whereas in the remaining all 34 patients, BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) was persistently detected, and minimal residual disease (MRD) fluctuated at low but detectable levels. PCR monitoring underestimated molecular response in 5 patients whose BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) was persisted, although BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) does not definitively mark TKI resistance. Therefore, quantification of BCR‐ ABL(I) (ns35bp) is useful for evaluating “functional” MRD and determining the effectiveness of TKI with accuracy. |
---|