Cargando…
How we perceive our own retina
Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression,...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5666110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 |
_version_ | 1783275243840733184 |
---|---|
author | Kirschfeld, Kuno |
author_facet | Kirschfeld, Kuno |
author_sort | Kirschfeld, Kuno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5666110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56661102017-11-09 How we perceive our own retina Kirschfeld, Kuno Proc Biol Sci Neuroscience and Cognition Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area. The Royal Society 2017-10-25 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5666110/ /pubmed/29070728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience and Cognition Kirschfeld, Kuno How we perceive our own retina |
title | How we perceive our own retina |
title_full | How we perceive our own retina |
title_fullStr | How we perceive our own retina |
title_full_unstemmed | How we perceive our own retina |
title_short | How we perceive our own retina |
title_sort | how we perceive our own retina |
topic | Neuroscience and Cognition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5666110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirschfeldkuno howweperceiveourownretina |