Cargando…

How we perceive our own retina

Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kirschfeld, Kuno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5666110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904
_version_ 1783275243840733184
author Kirschfeld, Kuno
author_facet Kirschfeld, Kuno
author_sort Kirschfeld, Kuno
collection PubMed
description Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5666110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56661102017-11-09 How we perceive our own retina Kirschfeld, Kuno Proc Biol Sci Neuroscience and Cognition Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area. The Royal Society 2017-10-25 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5666110/ /pubmed/29070728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience and Cognition
Kirschfeld, Kuno
How we perceive our own retina
title How we perceive our own retina
title_full How we perceive our own retina
title_fullStr How we perceive our own retina
title_full_unstemmed How we perceive our own retina
title_short How we perceive our own retina
title_sort how we perceive our own retina
topic Neuroscience and Cognition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5666110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29070728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904
work_keys_str_mv AT kirschfeldkuno howweperceiveourownretina