Cargando…

Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis

Brucella canis is a small intracellular Gram-negative bacterium whose primary host is the dog, but it also can cause mild human brucellosis. One of the main causes of an inefficient immune response against other species of Brucella is their interaction with dendritic cells (DCs), which affects antig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pujol, Myriam, Castillo, Francisca, Alvarez, Carla, Rojas, Camila, Borie, Consuelo, Ferreira, Arturo, Vernal, Rolando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0476-8
_version_ 1783275485692690432
author Pujol, Myriam
Castillo, Francisca
Alvarez, Carla
Rojas, Camila
Borie, Consuelo
Ferreira, Arturo
Vernal, Rolando
author_facet Pujol, Myriam
Castillo, Francisca
Alvarez, Carla
Rojas, Camila
Borie, Consuelo
Ferreira, Arturo
Vernal, Rolando
author_sort Pujol, Myriam
collection PubMed
description Brucella canis is a small intracellular Gram-negative bacterium whose primary host is the dog, but it also can cause mild human brucellosis. One of the main causes of an inefficient immune response against other species of Brucella is their interaction with dendritic cells (DCs), which affects antigen presentation and impairs the development of an effective Th1 immune response. This study analysed the cytokine pattern production, by RT-qPCR and ELISA, in human and canine DCs against whole B. canis or its purified LPS. Human and canine DCs produced different patterns of cytokines after stimulation with B. canis. In particular, while human DCs produced a Th1-pattern of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-12, and TNF-α), canine cells produced both Th1 and Th17-related cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, and IFN-γ). Thus, differences in susceptibility and pathogenicity between these two hosts could be explained, at least partly, by the distinct cytokine patterns observed in this study, where we propose that human DCs induce an effective Th1 immune response to control the infection, while canine DCs lead to a less effective immune response, with the activation of Th17-related response ineffective to control the B. canis infection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13567-017-0476-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5667440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56674402017-11-08 Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis Pujol, Myriam Castillo, Francisca Alvarez, Carla Rojas, Camila Borie, Consuelo Ferreira, Arturo Vernal, Rolando Vet Res Research Article Brucella canis is a small intracellular Gram-negative bacterium whose primary host is the dog, but it also can cause mild human brucellosis. One of the main causes of an inefficient immune response against other species of Brucella is their interaction with dendritic cells (DCs), which affects antigen presentation and impairs the development of an effective Th1 immune response. This study analysed the cytokine pattern production, by RT-qPCR and ELISA, in human and canine DCs against whole B. canis or its purified LPS. Human and canine DCs produced different patterns of cytokines after stimulation with B. canis. In particular, while human DCs produced a Th1-pattern of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-12, and TNF-α), canine cells produced both Th1 and Th17-related cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, IL-17, and IFN-γ). Thus, differences in susceptibility and pathogenicity between these two hosts could be explained, at least partly, by the distinct cytokine patterns observed in this study, where we propose that human DCs induce an effective Th1 immune response to control the infection, while canine DCs lead to a less effective immune response, with the activation of Th17-related response ineffective to control the B. canis infection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13567-017-0476-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5667440/ /pubmed/29096717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0476-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pujol, Myriam
Castillo, Francisca
Alvarez, Carla
Rojas, Camila
Borie, Consuelo
Ferreira, Arturo
Vernal, Rolando
Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title_full Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title_fullStr Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title_full_unstemmed Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title_short Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis
title_sort variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with brucella canis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0476-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pujolmyriam variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT castillofrancisca variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT alvarezcarla variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT rojascamila variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT borieconsuelo variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT ferreiraarturo variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis
AT vernalrolando variabilityintheresponseofcanineandhumandendriticcellsstimulatedwithbrucellacanis